Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 138

1.

Comparison of the frequency doubling technology screening algorithm and the Humphrey 24-2 SITA-FAST in a large eye screening.

Allen CS, Sponsel WE, Trigo Y, Dirks MS, Flynn WJ.

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;30(1):8-14.

PMID:
11885802
2.

Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.

Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y; Tajimi Study Group.

Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):27-32. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

PMID:
17070580
3.
4.

Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.

Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 21;52(10):7325-31. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7795.

PMID:
21810975
5.

Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry.

Tatemichi M, Nakano T, Tanaka K, Hayashi T, Nawa T, Miyamoto T, Hiro H, Iwasaki A, Sugita M; Glaucoma Screening Project (GSP) Study Group.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;134(4):529-37. Erratum in: Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Sep;136(3):592.

PMID:
12383809
6.

Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.

Kocabeyoglu S, Uzun S, Mocan MC, Bozkurt B, Irkec M, Orhan M.

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;61(10):576-9. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.119322.

7.

Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.

Kogure S, Toda Y, Crabb D, Kashiwagi K, Fitzke FW, Tsukahara S.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 May;87(5):604-8.

8.

Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.

North RV, Jones AL, Hunter E, Morgan JE, Wild JM.

Eye (Lond). 2006 Jun;20(6):681-7. Epub 2005 Jun 24.

PMID:
15999135
9.

Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?

Fong KC, Byles DB, Constable PH.

Eye (Lond). 2003 Apr;17(3):330-3.

PMID:
12724694
10.
11.

Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.

Newkirk MR, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Oct;47(10):4632-7.

PMID:
17003461
12.

Glaucoma diagnostics.

Geimer SA.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;91 Thesis 1:1-32. doi: 10.1111/aos.12072.

13.

Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.

Yamada N, Chen PP, Mills RP, Leen MM, Lieberman MF, Stamper RL, Stanford DC.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;117(11):1479-84.

PMID:
10565516
14.

Evaluation of Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry as a Means of Screening for Glaucoma and Other Eye Diseases Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Boland MV, Gupta P, Ko F, Zhao D, Guallar E, Friedman DS.

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(1):57-62. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4459.

PMID:
26562502
15.

Frequency doubling technology for earlier detection of functional damage in standard automated perimetry-normal hemifield in glaucoma with low-to-normal pressure.

Nakagawa S, Murata H, Saito H, Nakahara H, Mataki N, Tomidokoro A, Iwase A, Araie M.

J Glaucoma. 2012 Jan;21(1):22-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318202777e.

PMID:
21543995
16.

Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry.

Kook MS, Yang SJ, Kim S, Chung J, Kim ST, Tchah H.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;138(1):85-90.

PMID:
15234286
17.

Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss.

Prema R, George R, Hemamalini A, Sathyamangalam Ve R, Baskaran M, Vijaya L.

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):207-11. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.49395.

18.

Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.

Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2433-9.

PMID:
15980232
19.
20.

Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24-2 and 30-2 SITA Perimetry.

Han S, Baek SH, Kim US.

Semin Ophthalmol. 2017;32(5):647-650. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2016.1157611. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

PMID:
27404791

Supplemental Content

Support Center