Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Methacholine challenge: test-shortening procedures.

Cockcroft DW, Marciniuk DD, Hurst TS, Cotton DJ, Laframboise KF, McNab BD, Skomro RP.

Chest. 2001 Dec;120(6):1857-60.

PMID:
11742913
2.

Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods.

Cockcroft DW, Davis BE, Todd DC, Smycniuk AJ.

Chest. 2005 Mar;127(3):839-44.

PMID:
15764765
3.

Development of a methacholine challenge method to minimize methacholine waste.

Cockcroft DW, Davis BE, Smycniuk AJ.

Chest. 2003 Oct;124(4):1522-5.

PMID:
14555588
4.

Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma.

El-Gammal AI, Killian KJ, Scime TX, Beaudin S, Schlatman A, Cockcroft DW, Gauvreau GM.

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Jul;12(7):1039-43. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201412-571BC.

PMID:
25871542
5.

Methacholine challenge testing: comparison of the two American Thoracic Society-recommended methods.

Wubbel C, Asmus MJ, Stevens G, Chesrown SE, Hendeles L.

Chest. 2004 Feb;125(2):453-8.

PMID:
14769724
6.

Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults.

Siersted HC, Walker CM, O'Shaughnessy AD, Willan AR, Wiecek EM, Sears MR.

Eur Respir J. 2000 Jan;15(1):181-4.

7.
8.

Routine pulse oximetry during methacholine challenges is unnecessary for safety.

Cockcroft DW, Hurst TS, Marciniuk DD, Cotton DJ, Laframboise KF, Nagpal AK, Skomro RP.

Chest. 2000 Nov;118(5):1378-81.

PMID:
11083689
10.

Deep inspiration avoidance and methacholine response in normal subjects and patients with asthma.

Simard B, Turcotte H, Cockcroft DW, Davis BE, Boulay ME, Boulet LP.

Chest. 2005 Jan;127(1):135-42.

PMID:
15653974
11.

Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.

Dell SD, Bola SS, Foty RG, Marshall LC, Nelligan KA, Coates AL.

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Mar;12(3):357-63. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-433OC.

PMID:
25575246
12.

Methacholine challenge--comparison of an ATS protocol to a new rapid single concentration technique.

Schulze J, Rosewich M, Riemer C, Dressler M, Rose MA, Zielen S.

Respir Med. 2009 Dec;103(12):1898-903. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.06.007. Epub 2009 Jul 10.

13.

Differences in the response to methacholine between the tidal breathing and dosimeter methods: influence of the dose of bronchoconstrictor agent delivered to the mouth.

Prieto L, Lopez V, Llusar R, Rojas R, Marin J.

Chest. 2008 Oct;134(4):699-703. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0093. Epub 2008 Jul 14.

PMID:
18625670
15.
16.

Comparison of the protective effect amongst anticholinergic drugs on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma.

Sposato B, Barzan R, Calabrese A, Franco C.

J Asthma. 2008 Jun;45(5):397-401. doi: 10.1080/02770900801971818. Erratum in: J Asthma. 2009 Feb;46(1):104. Bruno, Sposato [corrected to Sposato, Bruno]; Roberta, Barzan [corrected to Barzan, Roberta]; Antonio, Calabrese [corrected to Calabrese, Antonio]; Clemente, Franco [corrected to Franco, Clemente].

PMID:
18569233
18.

The protective effect of salbutamol inhaled using different devices on methacholine bronchoconstriction.

Giannini D, Di Franco A, Bacci E, Dente FL, Taccola M, Vagaggini B, Paggiaro P.

Chest. 2000 May;117(5):1319-23.

PMID:
10807817
19.

Methacholine challenge testing in Reserve Officer Training Corps cadets.

Roth BJ, Hammers LM, Dillard TA.

Chest. 2001 Mar;119(3):701-7.

PMID:
11243945

Supplemental Content

Support Center