Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 65

2.

Coliform bacteria and nitrogen fixation in pulp and paper mill effluent treatment systems.

Gauthier F, Neufeld JD, Driscoll BT, Archibald FS.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Dec;66(12):5155-60.

3.

Molecular characterization of microbial communities in Canadian pulp and paper activated sludge and quantification of a novel Thiothrix eikelboomii-like bulking filament.

Dumonceaux TJ, Hill JE, Pelletier CP, Paice MG, Van Kessel AG, Hemmingsen SM.

Can J Microbiol. 2006 May;52(5):494-500.

PMID:
16699576
4.

Molecular analysis of bacterial isolates and total community DNA from kraft pulp mill effluent treatment systems.

Fortin N, Fulthorpe RR, Allen DG, Greer CW.

Can J Microbiol. 1998 Jun;44(6):537-46.

PMID:
9734304
5.

A comparison among different methods for evaluating the biomass activity in activated sludge systems: preliminary results.

Andreottola G, Baldassarre L, Collivignarelli C, Pedrazzani R, Principi P, Sorlini C, Ziglio G.

Water Sci Technol. 2002;46(1-2):413-7.

PMID:
12216659
6.
7.

The effects of stubble retention and nitrogen application on soil microbial community structure and functional gene abundance under irrigated maize.

Wakelin SA, Colloff MJ, Harvey PR, Marschner P, Gregg AL, Rogers SL.

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Mar;59(3):661-70. Epub 2006 Nov 21.

8.

Selective enrichment of a methanol-utilizing consortium using pulp and paper mill waste streams.

Mockos GR, Smith WA, Loge FJ, Thompson DN.

Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008 Mar;148(1-3):211-26. doi: 10.1007/s12010-007-8028-8. Epub 2007 Sep 25.

PMID:
18418753
9.

A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: characteristics of the study streams, sample sites, mills, and mill effluents.

Hall TJ, Ragsdale RL, Arthurs WJ, Ikoma J, Borton DL, Cook DL.

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Apr;5(2):199-218. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-054.1.

PMID:
19063588
10.

Characterization and quantification of class 1 integrons and associated gene cassettes in sewage treatment plants.

Zhang XX, Zhang T, Zhang M, Fang HH, Cheng SP.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Apr;82(6):1169-77. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-1886-y. Epub 2009 Feb 18.

PMID:
19224208
11.

Mapping field-scale spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifier community.

Philippot L, Cuhel J, Saby NP, Chèneby D, Chronáková A, Bru D, Arrouays D, Martin-Laurent F, Simek M.

Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jun;11(6):1518-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01879.x. Epub 2009 Mar 2.

PMID:
19260937
12.

Functional and compositional comparison of two activated sludge communities remediating coking effluent.

Manefield M, Griffiths RI, Leigh MB, Fisher R, Whiteley AS.

Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;7(5):715-22.

PMID:
15819853
13.

Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches.

Rompré A, Servais P, Baudart J, de-Roubin MR, Laurent P.

J Microbiol Methods. 2002 Mar;49(1):31-54. Review.

PMID:
11777581
14.

Elevated precursor 16S rRNA levels suggest the presence of growth inhibitors in wastewater.

Stroot PG, Oerther DB.

Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(11):241-50.

PMID:
12906296
17.

Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.

Bal AS, Dhagat NN.

Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Review.

PMID:
12397675
18.

A practical method for quantification of phosphorus- and glycogen-accumulating organism populations in activated sludge systems.

López-Vázquez CM, Hooijmans CM, Brdjanovic D, Gijzen HJ, van Loosdrecht MC.

Water Environ Res. 2007 Dec;79(13):2487-98.

PMID:
18198694
19.
20.

Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation on the activated sludge biomass in a kraft mill biotreatment system.

Bhathena J, Driscoll BT, Charles TC, Archibald FS.

Water Environ Res. 2006 Nov;78(12):2303-10.

PMID:
17243229

Supplemental Content

Support Center