Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 371

1.

Liberty, identity, and human cloning.

Robertson JA.

Tex Law Rev. 1998 May;76(6):1371-456. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
11660439
2.

The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.

Kass LR.

New Repub. 1997 Jun 2;216(22):17-26. No abstract available.

PMID:
11654974
3.

Human embryos and genetic testing: a private policy model.

Bonnicksen AL.

Politics Life Sci. 1992 Feb;11(1):53-62. No abstract available.

PMID:
11659581
4.
5.

Should there be governmental guidelines in bioethics? The French approach.

Labrusse-Riou C.

Boston College Int Comp Law Rev. 1989 Winter;12(1):89-101. No abstract available.

PMID:
11659185
6.

Asexual reproduction and genetic engineering: a constitutional assessment of the technology of cloning.

Pizzulli F.

South Calif Law Rev. 1974 Feb;47(2):476-584. No abstract available.

PMID:
11660870
7.

The ethics of human cloning.

Glannon W.

Public Aff Q. 1998 Jul;12(3):287-305. No abstract available.

PMID:
11657112
8.

Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.

American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee.

Fertil Steril. 1990 Jun;53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. No abstract available.

PMID:
11659223
9.

President asks experts for advice on the new reality of cloning.

Purdum TS.

N Y Times Web. 1997 Feb 25:A15. No abstract available.

PMID:
11647139
10.

Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.

Robertson JA.

Boston Univ Law Rev. 1996 Jun;76(3):421-82. No abstract available.

PMID:
11660289
11.

Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning.

Kolata G.

N Y Times Web. 1997 Jun 8:22. No abstract available.

PMID:
11647217
12.

Report on human cloning through embryo splitting: an amber light.

National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction (NABER).

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Sep;4(3):251-82. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
11645281
13.

Don't rush to judgment on "Dolly": human cloning and its individual procreative liberty implications.

Moore DL.

UMKC Law Rev. 1997 Winter;66(2):425-49. No abstract available.

PMID:
16273689
14.

Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.

American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee.

Fertil Steril. 1986 Sep;46(3) Suppl. 1):1S-94S. No abstract available.

PMID:
11658710
15.

Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.

Weiss R.

Washington Post. 1999 May 23:A1, A16. No abstract available.

PMID:
11648116
16.
17.

The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far?

Cannon J, Haas M.

Harvard J Legis. 1998 Summer;35(2):637-45. No abstract available.

PMID:
11660809
18.

Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality.

Shultz MM.

Wis L Rev. 1990;1990(2):297-398. No abstract available.

PMID:
11652059
19.

The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy.

Martin PA, Lagod ML.

High Technol Law J. 1990 Fall;5(2):257-310. No abstract available.

PMID:
11659412
20.

Medical research involving children: some legal and ethical issues.

Langer DH.

Bayl Law Rev. 1984 Winter;36(1):1-39. No abstract available.

PMID:
11658558

Supplemental Content

Support Center