Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 521

1.
2.

Usefulness of systematic review search strategies in finding child health systematic reviews in MEDLINE.

Boluyt N, Tjosvold L, Lefebvre C, Klassen TP, Offringa M.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Feb;162(2):111-6. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.40.

PMID:
18250233
3.

Consistency and accuracy of indexing systematic review articles and meta-analyses in medline.

Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB.

Health Info Libr J. 2009 Sep;26(3):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00823.x. Review.

5.

The pitfalls of a systematic MEDLINE review in palliative medicine: symptom assessment instruments.

O'Leary N, Tiernan E, Walsh D, Lucey N, Kirkova J, Davis MP.

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007 Jun-Jul;24(3):181-4.

PMID:
17601840
6.

Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.

Leeflang MM, Scholten RJ, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):234-40. Review.

7.

Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE.

Zhang L, Ajiferuke I, Sampson M.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 May 9;6:23.

8.

Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.

Royle PL, Bain L, Waugh NR.

Diabet Med. 2005 Oct;22(10):1386-93.

PMID:
16176201
9.

Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency.

Sampson M, McGowan J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1057-63. Epub 2006 Jun 23.

PMID:
16980145
10.

Identifying studies for systematic reviews. An example from medical imaging.

Berry E, Kelly S, Hutton J, Harris KM, Smith MA.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Spring;16(2):668-72.

PMID:
10932431
11.

Beyond Medline: reducing bias through extended systematic review search.

Savoie I, Helmer D, Green CJ, Kazanjian A.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Winter;19(1):168-78.

PMID:
12701949
12.

Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews.

Sampson M, Shojania KG, McGowan J, Daniel R, Rader T, Iansavichene AE, Ji J, Ansari MT, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):755-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.003. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

PMID:
18586179
13.

Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews.

Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C.

BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286-91. Review.

14.

Reanalysis of systematic reviews: the case of invasive strategies for acute coronary syndromes.

Kuukasjärvi P, Nordhausen K, Malmivaara A.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Fall;22(4):484-96.

PMID:
16984682
15.

Update of the FDG PET search strategy.

Mijnhout GS, Riphagen II, Hoekstra OS.

Nucl Med Commun. 2004 Dec;25(12):1187-9.

PMID:
15640777
16.
17.

A method for defining a journal subset for a clinical discipline using the bibliographies of systematic reviews.

Wilczynski NL, Garg AX, Haynes B; Nephrology Hedges Team.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):721-4.

PMID:
17911811
19.

Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.

Sampson M, Shojania KG, Garritty C, Horsley T, Ocampo M, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.004.

PMID:
18471656
20.

Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?

Lui S, Smith EJ, Terplan M.

Acupunct Med. 2010 Sep;28(3):149-53. doi: 10.1136/aim.2010.002444. Epub 2010 Jun 28.

PMID:
20615852

Supplemental Content

Support Center