Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 295

1.

Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits.

Vallabhajosula B, van Gorp WG.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2001;29(2):207-15.

PMID:
11471788
2.

Daubert, cognitive malingering, and test accuracy.

Mossman D.

Law Hum Behav. 2003 Jun;27(3):229-49.

PMID:
12794962
3.

Use of the TOMM in a criminal court forensic assessment setting.

Delain SL, Stafford KP, Ben-Porath YS.

Assessment. 2003 Dec;10(4):370-81.

PMID:
14682483
4.

Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.

Zlotnick J, Lin JR.

Forensic Sci Rev. 2001 Jul;13(2):87-99. Review.

PMID:
26256304
5.

Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.

Frederick RI, Bowden SC.

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):105-22. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b1210.

PMID:
19333066
6.
7.

Should human figure drawings be admitted into court?

Lally SJ.

J Pers Assess. 2001 Feb;76(1):135-49. Review.

PMID:
11206294
8.

Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.

Masten J, Strzelczyk JJ.

Health Phys. 2001 Dec;81(6):678-82.

PMID:
11725886
9.

Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.

Merwin SE, Moeller DW, Kennedy WE Jr, Moeller MP.

Health Phys. 2001 Dec;81(6):670-7.

PMID:
11725885
10.
11.

Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.

Davies J.

Med Law. 2005 Jun;24(2):243-57.

PMID:
16082863
12.
13.

A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence.

Marlowe DB.

Behav Sci Law. 1995 Spring;13(2):207-28.

PMID:
10150377
14.

Admissibility of neuropsychological testimony after Daubert and Kumho.

Stern BH.

NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16(2):93-101.

PMID:
11568467
15.

Standardizing the psychological autopsy: addressing the Daubert standard.

Snider JE, Hane S, Berman AL.

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2006 Oct;36(5):511-8.

PMID:
17087630
16.

Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.

Grivas CR, Komar DA.

J Forensic Sci. 2008 Jul;53(4):771-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00771.x.

PMID:
18489550
17.

Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering in persons reporting exposure to environmental and industrial toxins: Results of a known-groups analysis.

Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Black FW, Heinly MT, Love JM, Swift DA, Ciota M.

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Aug;21(5):439-48. Epub 2006 Jul 25.

18.

Quantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.

Thatcher RW, Biver CJ, North DM.

Clin Electroencephalogr. 2003 Apr;34(2):39-53.

PMID:
12784902
19.

What has a decade of Daubert wrought?

Berger MA.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S59-65.

PMID:
16030340
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk