Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 60

1.

Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.

Beaton DE.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3192-9. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
11124736
2.

The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures.

Hudak PL, Wright JG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3167-77. Review.

PMID:
11124733
3.

Prognosis or "curabo effect?": physician prediction and patient outcome of surgery for low back pain and sciatica.

Graz B, Wietlisbach V, Porchet F, Vader JP.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1448-52; discussion 1453.

PMID:
15959377
4.

Correlation of low back pain with functional status, general health perception, social participation, subjective happiness, and patient satisfaction.

Takeyachi Y, Konno S, Otani K, Yamauchi K, Takahashi I, Suzukamo Y, Kikuchi S.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 1;28(13):1461-6; discussion 1467.

PMID:
12838106
5.

Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.

Zanoli G.

Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005 Jun;76(318):5-47. Review.

PMID:
16175972
6.

Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain.

Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):E492-501.

PMID:
15507789
7.

Can a patient educational book change behavior and reduce pain in chronic low back pain patients?

Udermann BE, Spratt KF, Donelson RG, Mayer J, Graves JE, Tillotson J.

Spine J. 2004 Jul-Aug;4(4):425-35.

PMID:
15246305
8.

Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery?

Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 1;34(15):1590-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819fcd52.

PMID:
19521272
9.

Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders.

Zanoli G, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Nov 1;26(21):2375-80.

PMID:
11679824
10.
11.

Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain.

Pengel LH, Refshauge KM, Maher CG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15;29(8):879-83.

PMID:
15082988
12.

Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain.

van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, van Tulder MW, de Vet HC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 1;31(5):578-82.

PMID:
16508555
14.
15.

The effect of exercise on adrenocortical responsiveness of patients with chronic low back pain, controlled for psychological strain.

Chatzitheodorou D, Mavromoustakos S, Milioti S.

Clin Rehabil. 2008 Apr;22(4):319-28. doi: 10.1177/0269215507079858.

PMID:
18390975
16.

Patient expectations of treatment for back pain: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Verbeek J, Sengers MJ, Riemens L, Haafkens J.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2309-18. Review.

PMID:
15480147
17.

Biomechanics of back pain.

Adams MA.

Acupunct Med. 2004 Dec;22(4):178-88. Review.

18.

Clinically important outcomes in low back pain.

Ostelo RW, de Vet HC.

Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;19(4):593-607. Review.

PMID:
15949778
19.

Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4.

PMID:
15928561
20.

Corticospinal excitability in patients with chronic low back pain.

Strutton PH, Theodorou S, Catley M, McGregor AH, Davey NJ.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Oct;18(5):420-4.

PMID:
16189454

Supplemental Content

Support Center