Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 148

1.

Procedure-related miscarriages and Down syndrome-affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferences.

Kuppermann M, Nease RF, Learman LA, Gates E, Blumberg B, Washington AE.

Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;96(4):511-6.

PMID:
11004350
2.

How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes?

Kuppermann M, Nease Jr RF, Gates E, Learman LA, Blumberg B, Gildengorin V, Washington AE.

Prenat Diagn. 2004 Jun;24(6):424-9.

PMID:
15229840
3.

Perceived risk of prenatal diagnostic procedure-related miscarriage and Down syndrome among pregnant women.

Caughey AB, Washington AE, Kuppermann M.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;198(3):333.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.045. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

PMID:
18177830
4.

The utility assessment of Chinese pregnant women towards the birth of a baby with Down syndrome compared to a procedure-related miscarriage.

Chan YM, Leung TN, Leung TY, Fung TY, Chan LW, Lau TK.

Prenat Diagn. 2006 Sep;26(9):819-24.

PMID:
16832829
5.

Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff?

Grobman WA, Dooley SL, Welshman EE, Pergament E, Calhoun EA.

Prenat Diagn. 2002 Dec;22(13):1195-200.

PMID:
12478632
6.

Beyond race or ethnicity and socioeconomic status: predictors of prenatal testing for Down syndrome.

Kuppermann M, Learman LA, Gates E, Gregorich SE, Nease RF Jr, Lewis J, Washington AE.

Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;107(5):1087-97. Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):453.

PMID:
16648415
7.

Women's preferences in screening for Down syndrome.

Deverill M, Robson S.

Prenat Diagn. 2006 Sep;26(9):837-41.

PMID:
16845681
8.

Miscarriage after invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures: how much risk our pregnant women are willing to take?

Chan YM, Sahota DS, Chan OK, Leung TY, Lau TK.

Prenat Diagn. 2009 Sep;29(9):870-4. doi: 10.1002/pd.2305.

PMID:
19499531
9.

Do women prefer to have screening tests for Down syndrome that have the lowest screen-positive rate or the highest detection rate?

Mulvey S, Zachariah R, McIlwaine K, Wallace EM.

Prenat Diagn. 2003 Oct;23(10):828-32.

PMID:
14558028
10.

Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter most.

Kuppermann M, Feeny D, Gates E, Posner SF, Blumberg B, Washington AE.

Prenat Diagn. 1999 Aug;19(8):711-6.

PMID:
10451513
11.

Computerized prenatal genetic testing decision-assisting tool: a randomized controlled trial.

Kuppermann M, Norton ME, Gates E, Gregorich SE, Learman LA, Nakagawa S, Feldstein VA, Lewis J, Washington AE, Nease RF Jr.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;113(1):53-63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818e7ec4.

PMID:
19104360
12.

Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomes: preferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge?

Kuppermann M, Gates E, Washington AE.

Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;87(5 Pt 1):675-82.

PMID:
8677066
13.

Women's preferences for reporting of Down syndrome screening results.

Mulvey S, Pham T, Tyzack K, Wallace EM.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Nov;42(5):504-7.

PMID:
12495095
14.

Women's and health professionals' preferences for prenatal testing for Down syndrome in Australia.

Lewis SM, Cullinane FM, Carlin JB, Halliday JL.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Jun;46(3):205-11.

PMID:
16704474
15.

Prenatal diagnosis for the detection of Down syndrome: why are so few eligible women tested?

Lippman-Hand A, Piper M.

Prenat Diagn. 1981 Oct;1(4):249-57.

PMID:
6213956
16.

Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's Syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis study.

Bishop AJ, Marteau TM, Armstrong D, Chitty LS, Longworth L, Buxton MJ, Berlin C.

BJOG. 2004 Aug;111(8):775-9.

17.
18.

Costs and effects of prenatal screening methods for Down syndrome and neural tube defects.

Hoogendoorn M, Evers SM, Schielen PC, van Genugten ML, de Wit GA, Ament AJ.

Community Genet. 2008;11(6):359-67. doi: 10.1159/000133308. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

PMID:
18690004
19.

An outcomes analysis of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomy 21 in women younger than 35 years.

Biggio JR Jr, Morris TC, Owen J, Stringer JS.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;190(3):721-9.

PMID:
15042005
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center