Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.

Ukoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JA, Burney PG.

Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92. Review. No abstract available.

2.

Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment.

Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, de Koning K.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(23):iii-157. Review. No abstract available.

3.

Telemedicine evaluation.

Bashshur R, Shannon G, Sapci H.

Telemed J E Health. 2005 Jun;11(3):296-316.

4.

Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions.

Briggs AH, Gray AM.

BMJ. 1999 Sep 4;319(7210):635-8. No abstract available.

5.

The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research.

Grigsby J, Brega AG, Devore PA.

Telemed J E Health. 2005 Jun;11(3):317-28. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
16035929
6.

How to understand the assessment of psychiatric technology.

Westrin CG.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Fall;12(4):547-53. No abstract available.

PMID:
9136466
7.

Research findings and strategies for assessing telemedicine costs.

Reardon T.

Telemed J E Health. 2005 Jun;11(3):348-69. Review.

8.

Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies.

Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Campbell M, Ramsay C.

Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):47-52.

9.

Some evaluation needs.

Mosteller F.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:12-7. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
8192289
10.
11.

Technology assessment and public health.

Power EJ, Tunis SR, Wagner JL.

Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:561-79. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
8054099
12.

More appropriate evaluation methods for community-level health interventions. Introduction to the special issue.

McKinlay JB.

Eval Rev. 1996 Jun;20(3):237-43. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
10182203
13.

Intraclass correlation coefficient and outcome prevalence are associated in clustered binary data.

Gulliford MC, Adams G, Ukoumunne OC, Latinovic R, Chinn S, Campbell MJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):246-51.

PMID:
15718113
14.

Care to compare?

Aston G.

Hosp Health Netw. 2008 Dec;82(12):38-41, 1.

PMID:
19209502
15.

'How can I know what I think till I see what I say?' Evaluating health care structure.

Stoelwinder JU.

Aust Health Rev. 1992;15(3):248-58. No abstract available.

PMID:
10121777
16.

Telemedicine system evaluation, transaction models, and multicentered research.

Perednia DA.

J AHIMA. 1996 Jan;67(1):60-3; quiz 64-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
10154050
17.

Clinical outcomes associated with telemedicine/telehealth.

Heinzelmann PJ, Williams CM, Lugn NE, Kvedar JC.

Telemed J E Health. 2005 Jun;11(3):329-47. Review.

PMID:
16035930
18.

Improving care and constraining costs: evaluating New York City's cluster care demonstration.

Hornbrook MC.

Health Serv Res. 1996 Oct;31(4):509-13. No abstract available.

19.

The Health Technology Assessment-disease management instrument reliably measured methodologic quality of health technology assessments of disease management.

Steuten LM, Vrijhoef HJ, van Merode GG, Severens JL, Spreeuwenberg C.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Sep;57(9):881-8.

PMID:
15504631
20.

[How can the impact of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in the Austrian healthcare system be assessed? Design of a conceptual framework].

Schumacher I, Zechmeister I.

Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Apr;74(4):257-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270503. Epub 2011 Jan 25. German.

PMID:
21267815

Supplemental Content

Support Center