Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

Bias in peer review.

Eaton K, Anthony H.

J R Soc Med. 2000 Jun;93(6):338. No abstract available.

2.

Is peer review in crisis?

Mulligan A.

Oral Oncol. 2005 Feb;41(2):135-41. No abstract available.

PMID:
15695114
3.

Reviewers, authors, and editors: balance of power.

Bressler NM.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Apr;117(4):524-6. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
10206584
4.

Complementary and alternative medicine.

Manassiev N.

Br J Gen Pract. 2008 May;58(550):362; author reply 362-3. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X280227. No abstract available.

5.
6.

Suppression, bias, and selection in science: the case of cancer research.

Hess DJ.

Account Res. 1999;6(4):245-57. No abstract available.

PMID:
11657839
7.

Registration of trials and protocols.

Staessen JA, Bianchi G.

Lancet. 2003 Sep 27;362(9389):1009-10. No abstract available.

PMID:
14522528
8.

A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias.

Smulders YM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):946-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

PMID:
23845183
9.

Medical journal peer review: process and bias.

Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Boswell MV, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):E1-E14. Review.

10.
11.

Reducing publication bias in biomedical research: reviewing and registering protocol with a suitable journal.

Rezaeian M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:248-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 13. No abstract available.

PMID:
26051243
12.

An examination of sources of peer-review bias.

Blackburn JL, Hakel MD.

Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):378-82.

PMID:
16683923
13.

Peer review. Peerless review.

Carpenter RH.

J R Soc Med. 2006 Aug;99(8):384-5. No abstract available.

14.

The need to act a little more 'scientific': biomedical researchers investigating complementary and alternative medicine.

Polich G, Dole C, Kaptchuk TJ.

Sociol Health Illn. 2010 Jan;32(1):106-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01185.x. Epub 2009 Nov 4.

15.

Peer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.

Felthous AR, Wettstein RM.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(3):305-14.

PMID:
25187283
16.

Minimizing the three stages of publication bias.

Chalmers TC, Frank CS, Reitman D.

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1392-5.

PMID:
2406473
17.

Publication bias in complementary/alternative medicine.

Ernst E.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1093-4. Epub 2007 Sep 14. No abstract available.

PMID:
17938049
18.

"Outing" peer review: medical editors scrutinize the value of secrecy.

Vanchieri C.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Nov 5;89(21):1568-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
9362150
19.

Accounting for uncertainty about investigator bias: disclosure is informative.

Greenland S.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Aug;63(8):593-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.084913. No abstract available.

PMID:
19596837
20.

The ethics of peer review: What to know before saying "yes".

Siedlecki SL.

Nursing. 2015 Dec;45(12):51-4. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000473395.43930.46. No abstract available.

PMID:
26580113

Supplemental Content

Support Center