Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 180

1.

The art and science of chart review.

Allison JJ, Wall TC, Spettell CM, Calhoun J, Fargason CA Jr, Kobylinski RW, Farmer R, Kiefe C.

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Mar;26(3):115-36.

PMID:
10709146
2.

Methodology to improve data quality from chart review in the managed care setting.

Cassidy LD, Marsh GM, Holleran MK, Ruhl LS.

Am J Manag Care. 2002 Sep;8(9):787-93.

3.

[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].

Renou S, Hergueta T, Flament M, Mouren-Simeoni MC, Lecrubier Y.

Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. Review. French.

PMID:
15107714
4.

The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. Review.

5.

How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.

Luck J, Peabody JW, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M, Glassman P.

Am J Med. 2000 Jun 1;108(8):642-9.

PMID:
10856412
6.

Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.

Benedetto AR.

Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.

PMID:
12800564
8.

Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL.

J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jan;210(1):6-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031. Epub 2009 Nov 22.

PMID:
20123325
9.

Training, quality assurance, and assessment of medical record abstraction in a multisite study.

Reisch LM, Fosse JS, Beverly K, Yu O, Barlow WE, Harris EL, Rolnick S, Barton MB, Geiger AM, Herrinton LJ, Greene SM, Fletcher SW, Elmore JG.

Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Mar 15;157(6):546-51.

PMID:
12631545
10.

Evaluation of the agency for healthcare research and quality pediatric quality indicators.

Scanlon MC, Harris JM 2nd, Levy F, Sedman A.

Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1723-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3247. Epub 2008 May 12.

PMID:
18474532
11.

Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?

Gilbert EH, Lowenstein SR, Koziol-McLain J, Barta DC, Steiner J.

Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;27(3):305-8.

PMID:
8599488
12.

[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].

Biggeri A, Bellini P, Terracini B; Italian MISA Group..

Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71. Italian.

PMID:
11515188
13.
14.

Clinical quality measurement. Comparing chart review and automated methodologies.

Dresser MV, Feingold L, Rosenkranz SL, Coltin KL.

Med Care. 1997 Jun;35(6):539-52.

PMID:
9191700
15.

Review criteria for stroke rehabilitation outcomes.

Forbes SA, Duncan PW, Zimmerman MK.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Oct;78(10):1112-6.

PMID:
9339162
16.
17.

Quality-of-care review of optometric records: inter-rater reliability.

Soroka M, Feldman L, Crump T.

J Healthc Qual. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):29-33.

PMID:
15468653
18.

Development of a clinical chart audit programme.

Zissiadis Y, Harper E, Harper C.

Australas Radiol. 2006 Aug;50(4):349-54.

PMID:
16884422
19.

Centralized medical monitoring in phase III clinical trials: the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) experience.

Soran A, Nesbitt L, Mamounas EP, Lembersky B, Bryant J, Anderson S, Brown A, Passarello M.

Clin Trials. 2006;3(5):478-85.

PMID:
17060221
20.

Ensuring high accuracy of data abstracted from patient charts: the use of a standardized medical record as a training tool.

Pan L, Fergusson D, Schweitzer I, Hebert PC.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;58(9):918-23.

PMID:
16085195

Supplemental Content

Support Center