Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 111

1.

A new amorphous hydrocolloid for the treatment of pressure sores: a randomised controlled study.

Matzen S, Peschardt A, Alsbjørn B.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999 Mar;33(1):13-5.

PMID:
10207960
2.

Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.

Alm A, Hornmark AM, Fall PA, Linder L, Bergstrand B, Ehrnebo M, Madsen SM, Setterberg G.

Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1989;149:1-10.

PMID:
2694713
3.

Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.

Darkovich SL, Brown-Etris M, Spencer M.

Ostomy Wound Manage. 1990 Jul-Aug;29:47-60.

PMID:
2202317
4.

A comparison of two amorphous hydrogels in the debridement of pressure sores.

Bale S, Banks V, Haglestein S, Harding KG.

J Wound Care. 1998 Feb;7(2):65-8.

PMID:
9543975
5.
6.

Granuflex dressings in treatment of full thickness pressure sores.

Dobrzanski S, Kelly CM, Gray JI, Gregg AJ, Cosgrove CA.

Prof Nurse. 1990 Aug;5(11):594-9.

PMID:
2204069
7.

A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds.

Thomas S, Banks V, Bale S, Fear-Price M, Hagelstein S, Harding KG, Orpin J, Thomas N.

J Wound Care. 1997 Sep;6(8):383-6.

PMID:
9341430
8.

Economic evaluation of collagenase-containing ointment and hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers.

Müller E, van Leen MW, Bergemann R.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(12):1209-16.

PMID:
11772156
9.

A systematic review of the use of hydrocolloids in the treatment of pressure ulcers.

Heyneman A, Beele H, Vanderwee K, Defloor T.

J Clin Nurs. 2008 May;17(9):1164-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02218.x. Review.

PMID:
18416792
10.

Acemannan hydrogel dressing versus saline dressing for pressure ulcers. A randomized, controlled trial.

Thomas DR, Goode PS, LaMaster K, Tennyson T.

Adv Wound Care. 1998 Oct;11(6):273-6.

PMID:
10326343
11.

Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.

Chang KW, Alsagoff S, Ong KT, Sim PH.

Med J Malaysia. 1998 Dec;53(4):428-31.

12.

Improved pressure sore healing with hydrocolloid dressings.

Gorse GJ, Messner RL.

Arch Dermatol. 1987 Jun;123(6):766-71.

PMID:
3555355
13.
14.

Debridement for venous leg ulcers.

Gethin G, Cowman S, Kolbach DN.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;(9):CD008599. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008599.pub2. Review.

PMID:
26368002
15.

Healing pressure ulcers with collagen or hydrocolloid: a randomized, controlled trial.

Graumlich JF, Blough LS, McLaughlin RG, Milbrandt JC, Calderon CL, Agha SA, Scheibel LW.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Feb;51(2):147-54.

PMID:
12558709
16.

3M Tegasorb Thin: a hydrocolloid dressing for chronic wounds.

Williams C.

Br J Nurs. 2000 Jun 8-21;9(11):720-3.

PMID:
11235265
17.

Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Xakellis GC, Chrischilles EA.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 May;73(5):463-9.

PMID:
1580775
18.

Evaluation of a silver-releasing hydroalginate dressing in chronic wounds with signs of local infection.

Meaume S, Vallet D, Morere MN, Téot L.

J Wound Care. 2005 Oct;14(9):411-9. Erratum in: J Wound Care. 2005 Nov;14(10):479.

PMID:
16240620
19.

A randomized comparison of poly-hema and hydrocolloid dressings for treatment of pressure sores.

Brod M, McHenry E, Plasse TF, Fedorczyk D, Trout JR.

Arch Dermatol. 1990 Jul;126(7):969-70. No abstract available.

PMID:
2193631
20.

Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers.

Edwards J, Stapley S.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD003556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003556.pub2. Review.

PMID:
20091547

Supplemental Content

Support Center