Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem.

Manning WG.

J Health Econ. 1998 Jun;17(3):283-95. No abstract available.

PMID:
10180919
2.
3.

Health care expenditure and GDP: panel data unit root test results.

Hansen P, King A.

J Health Econ. 1998 Jun;17(3):377-81. No abstract available.

PMID:
10180924
4.

Overview of the special supplement issue.

McClellan MB, Newhouse JP.

Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 2):1061-9. No abstract available.

5.

Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?

Manning WG, Mullahy J.

J Health Econ. 2001 Jul;20(4):461-94.

PMID:
11469231
6.

Standard errors for the retransformation problem with heteroscedasticity.

Ai C, Norton EC.

J Health Econ. 2000 Sep;19(5):697-718.

PMID:
11184800
7.

Quality improvement studies: the need is there but so are the challenges.

Krumholz HM, Herrin J.

Am J Med. 2000 Oct 15;109(6):501-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
11042244
8.

Definition, interpretation and calculation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Löthgren M, Zethraeus N.

Health Econ. 2000 Oct;9(7):623-30.

PMID:
11103928
9.

Seven reasons why you should not categorize continuous data.

Dinero TE.

J Health Soc Policy. 1996;8(1):63-72.

PMID:
10162905
10.

EFPF (economic frontier production function): DEA (data envelopment analysis) preview.

Rosenberg D.

J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1991 Summer;14(1):77-83. No abstract available.

PMID:
10115640
11.

Validity and reliability issues in published public health and social policy research.

Lewis DM, Cuevas NM.

J Health Soc Policy. 1996;8(1):23-38. Review.

PMID:
10162902
12.

Stationarity of health expenditures and GDP: evidence from panel unit root tests with heterogeneous structural breaks.

Jewell T, Lee J, Tieslau M, Strazicich MC.

J Health Econ. 2003 Mar;22(2):313-23. Erratum in: J Health Econ. 2008 Jul;27(4):1141-2.

PMID:
12606148
13.

Reading qualitative research from a methodological point of view.

Cuevas NM, Dinero TE, Feit MD.

J Health Soc Policy. 1996;8(1):73-90. No abstract available.

PMID:
10162906
14.

Rigor at the expense of relevance equals rigidity: where to next in the study of medical care utilization?

Rohrer JE.

Health Serv Res. 2000 Feb;34(6):1307-10; discussion 1311-4. No abstract available.

15.

On stationarity and cointegration of international health expenditure and GDP.

Gerdtham UG, Löthgren M.

J Health Econ. 2000 Jul;19(4):461-75.

PMID:
11010235
16.

Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change.

Luce BR, Kramer JM, Goodman SN, Connor JT, Tunis S, Whicher D, Schwartz JS.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):206-9. Epub 2009 Jun 30. No abstract available.

PMID:
19567619
17.

Basics of research (Part 14). Survey research methodology: designing the survey instrument.

Totten VY, Panacek EA, Price D.

Air Med J. 1999 Jan-Mar;18(1):26-34. No abstract available.

PMID:
10345782
19.

Designing quality health services research: why comparative effectiveness studies are needed and why pharmacists should be involved.

Carter BL.

Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Aug;30(8):751-7. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.8.751. No abstract available.

PMID:
20653349
20.

Ways of knowing: reflections of a health economist.

Muller CF.

Med Care. 1993 Oct;31(10):956-67. No abstract available.

PMID:
8412395

Supplemental Content

Support Center