Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 141

1.

Reliability of the non-contact corneal aesthesiometer and its comparison with the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.

Murphy PJ, Lawrenson JG, Patel S, Marshall J.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998 Nov;18(6):532-9.

PMID:
10070549
2.

Assessing the sensory function of the ocular surface: implications of use of a non-contact air jet aesthesiometer versus the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.

Golebiowski B, Papas E, Stapleton F.

Exp Eye Res. 2011 May;92(5):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

PMID:
21376718
3.

A new non-contact corneal aesthesiometer (NCCA).

Murphy PJ, Patel S, Marshall J.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Mar;16(2):101-7.

PMID:
8762770
4.

Noninvasive assessment of corneal sensitivity in young and elderly diabetic and nondiabetic subjects.

Murphy PJ, Patel S, Kong N, Ryder RE, Marshall J.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jun;45(6):1737-42.

PMID:
15161834
5.

The minimum stimulus energy required to produce a cooling sensation in the human cornea.

Murphy PJ, Patel S, Morgan PB, Marshall J.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001 Sep;21(5):407-10.

PMID:
11563429
6.

Effect of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy on corneal sensitivity: a longitudinal study.

Murphy PJ, O'Brart DP, Stephenson CG, Oliver KM, Patel S, Marshall J.

J Refract Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;19(1):34-9.

PMID:
12553603
7.

Corneal surface temperature change as the mode of stimulation of the non-contact corneal aesthesiometer.

Murphy PJ, Morgan PB, Patel S, Marshall J.

Cornea. 1999 May;18(3):333-42.

PMID:
10336038
8.

The effect of long-term, daily contact lens wear on corneal sensitivity.

Murphy PJ, Patel S, Marshall J.

Cornea. 2001 Apr;20(3):264-9.

PMID:
11322414
9.

Understanding the stimulus of an air-jet aesthesiometer: computerised modelling and subjective interpretation.

Golebiowski B, Lim M, Papas E, Stapleton F.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Mar;33(2):104-13. doi: 10.1111/opo.12025.

PMID:
23406490
10.
11.

Factors affecting corneal and conjunctival sensitivity measurement.

Golebiowski B, Papas EB, Stapleton F.

Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Apr;85(4):241-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181694f96.

PMID:
18382334
12.

Comparative clinical assessment of corneal sensation with a new aesthesiometer.

Beuerman RW, McCulley JP.

Am J Ophthalmol. 1978 Dec;86(6):812-5.

PMID:
736079
13.

Effect of 30% sodium sulfacetamide on corneal sensitivity.

Chang FW, Reinhart S, Fraser NM.

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984 May;61(5):318-20.

PMID:
6731581
14.

Corneal epitheliopathy of dry eye induces hyperesthesia to mechanical air jet stimulation.

De Paiva CS, Pflugfelder SC.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;137(1):109-15.

PMID:
14700652
15.
16.

Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer-determined corneal sensitivity in neonatal foals and adult horses.

Brooks DE, Clark CK, Lester GD.

Vet Ophthalmol. 2000;3(2-3):133-137.

PMID:
11397295
17.

Eccentric variation of corneal sensitivity to pneumatic stimulation at different temperatures and with CO2.

Situ P, Simpson TL, Fonn D.

Exp Eye Res. 2007 Sep;85(3):400-5. Epub 2007 Jun 19.

PMID:
17662716
18.

Ocular surface sensitivity repeatability with Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer.

Chao C, Stapleton F, Badarudin E, Golebiowski B.

Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Feb;92(2):183-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000472.

PMID:
25546826
19.

Corneal sensitivity and some properties of the tear film after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Patel S, Pérez-Santonja JJ, Alió JL, Murphy PJ.

J Refract Surg. 2001 Jan-Feb;17(1):17-24.

PMID:
11201773
20.

Nociceptive sensation and sensitivity evoked from human cornea and conjunctiva stimulated by CO2.

Feng Y, Simpson TL.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Feb;44(2):529-32.

PMID:
12556379

Supplemental Content

Support Center