Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 106

1.

Is anterior decompression and fusion superior to laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xu P, Zhuang JS, Huang YS, Chen JT, Zhong ZM.

J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Mar 19:1-15. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1579987. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30888255
2.

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.

Qin R, Chen X, Zhou P, Li M, Hao J, Zhang F.

Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1375-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5451-6. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

PMID:
29335903
3.

Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis.

Chen TP, Qian LG, Jiao JB, Li QG, Sun B, Chen K, Wang YF, Liang ZX, Chen YM, Meng J.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(1):e13382. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013382.

4.

Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Kim B, Yoon DH, Shin HC, Kim KN, Yi S, Shin DA, Ha Y.

Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.028. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

PMID:
25637468
5.

Surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty.

Xu P, Zhuang JS, Huang YS, Tu C, Chen JT, Zhong ZM.

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019837907. doi: 10.1177/2309499019837907.

PMID:
30894095
6.
7.

Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty.

Sakai K, Okawa A, Takahashi M, Arai Y, Kawabata S, Enomoto M, Kato T, Hirai T, Shinomiya K.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):367-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821f4a51.

PMID:
21540774
8.

Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu X, Min S, Zhang H, Zhou Z, Wang H, Jin A.

Eur Spine J. 2014 Feb;23(2):362-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3043-7. Epub 2013 Oct 5. Review.

9.

Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study.

Yoshii T, Sakai K, Hirai T, Yamada T, Inose H, Kato T, Enomoto M, Tomizawa S, Kawabata S, Arai Y, Okawa A.

Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1351-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.532. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

PMID:
27498333
10.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior decompression with fusion and posterior laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Yoshii T, Egawa S, Hirai T, Kaito T, Mori K, Koda M, Chikuda H, Hasegawa T, Imagama S, Yoshida M, Iwasaki M, Okawa A, Kawaguchi Y.

J Orthop Sci. 2019 Mar 21. pii: S0949-2658(19)30073-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.004. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30905611
11.

Prediction of Outcome Following Surgical Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy Based on Features of Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review.

Nakashima H, Tetreault L, Kato S, Kryshtalskyj MT, Nagoshi N, Nouri A, Singh A, Fehlings MG.

JBJS Rev. 2017 Feb 28;5(2). pii: 01874474-201702000-00003. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00023. Review.

PMID:
28248739
12.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H, Aiba A, Kadota R, Inada T, Kamiya K, Ota M, Maki S, Takahashi K, Yamazaki M, Mannoji C, Furuya T.

Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2294-301. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4555-8. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

PMID:
27072553
13.

The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.

Maruo K, Moriyama T, Tachibana T, Inoue S, Arizumi F, Daimon T, Yoshiya S.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):938-43. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE131197. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

PMID:
25279653
14.

Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 2: Advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty.

Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):654-60.

PMID:
17413470
15.

Anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy.

Liu X, Wang H, Zhou Z, Jin A.

Orthopedics. 2014 Feb;37(2):e117-22. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140124-12. Review.

PMID:
24679196
16.

Surgical results and complications of anterior decompression and fusion as a revision surgery after initial posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Odate S, Shikata J, Soeda T, Yamamura S, Kawaguchi S.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):466-473. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16430. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

PMID:
28128699
17.

Comparison of anterior corpectomy and fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.

Chen Z, Liu B, Dong J, Feng F, Chen R, Xie P, Zhang L, Rong L.

Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jun;40(6):E8. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS15596.

PMID:
27246491
18.
19.

A Comparative Study of Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients With Large Anterior Compression of the Spinal Cord.

Hirai T, Yoshii T, Arai Y, Sakai K, Torigoe I, Maehara H, Tomori M, Taniyama T, Sato H, Okawa A.

Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):E1137-E1142. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000500.

PMID:
28099187
20.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in decompression and fusion versus decompression only in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.

Mehdi SK, Alentado VJ, Lee BS, Mroz TE, Benzel EC, Steinmetz MP.

Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jun;40(6):E9. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS1630.

PMID:
27246492

Supplemental Content

Support Center