Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

The differences in the esophageal motility between liquid and solid bolus swallows: A multicenter high-resolution manometry study in Chinese asymptomatic volunteers.

Xiang X, Wang A, Tu L, Xie X, Ke M, Yang Y, Jiang B, Lin L, Dai N, Zhang S, Tao L, Xu H, Liang X, Fang X, Xia Z, Wang X, Wu J, Wang M, Zhang H, Fang Y, Shen C, Wang J, Peng L, Li W, Wang Z, Wang K, Liu N, Hou X.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Feb 28:e13574. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13574. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30821105
2.

The motility of esophageal sphincters during liquid and solid bolus swallows: a multicenter normative value study of high-resolution manometry in China.

Xiang XL, Wang A, Tu L, Ke MY, Yang YS, Jiang B, Lin L, Dai N, Zhang SS, Tao L, Xu H, Liang XM, Fang XC, Xia ZW, Wang X, Wu JN, Wang MF, Zhang HJ, Fang YF, Shen C, Wang J, Peng LH, Li WY, Wang ZF, Wang K, Liu N, Hou XH.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Jan;29(1). doi: 10.1111/nmo.12914. Epub 2016 Sep 25.

PMID:
27665746
3.

Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid-state high-resolution manometry.

Xiang X, Tu L, Zhang X, Xie X, Hou X.

Dis Esophagus. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(7):661-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12029. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

PMID:
23384164
4.

Esophageal Motility in the Supine and Upright Positions for Liquid and Solid Swallows Through High-resolution Manometry.

Zhang X, Xiang X, Tu L, Xie X, Hou X.

J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Oct;19(4):467-72. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.4.467. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

5.

Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers.

Tutuian R, Vela MF, Balaji NS, Wise JL, Murray JA, Peters JH, Shay SS, Castell DO.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 May;1(3):174-82.

PMID:
15017488
6.

Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings.

Bernhard A, Pohl D, Fried M, Castell DO, Tutuian R.

Dig Dis Sci. 2008 May;53(5):1198-205. Epub 2007 Oct 12.

7.

Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population.

Shi Y, Xiao Y, Peng S, Lin J, Xiong L, Chen M.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;28(10):1611-5. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12285.

PMID:
23730912
8.

Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry in healthy volunteers.

Chen CL, Yi CH, Chou AS, Liu TT.

Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jan;26(1):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01329.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

PMID:
22394249
9.

Assessment of esophageal function using provocative tests during high resolution manometry: A single-center experience.

Wong MW, Lei WY, Hung JS, Liu TT, Yi CH, Chen CL.

J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Jan;118(1 Pt 2):244-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 May 9.

10.

Pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders.

Hollenstein M, Thwaites P, Bütikofer S, Heinrich H, Sauter M, Ulmer I, Pohl D, Ang D, Eberli D, Schwizer W, Fried M, Distler O, Fox M, Misselwitz B.

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep;2(9):644-653. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30151-6. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

PMID:
28684261
11.

In ineffective esophageal motility, failed swallows are more functionally relevant than weak swallows.

Jain A, Baker JR, Chen JW.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jun;30(6):e13297. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13297. Epub 2018 Apr 14.

PMID:
29368366
12.

An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.

Blonski W, Hila A, Vela MF, Castell DO.

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;42(7):776-81. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31806daf77.

PMID:
18360293
13.

Relationship between esophageal contraction patterns and clearance of swallowed liquid and solid boluses in healthy controls and patients with dysphagia.

Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, Siersema PD, Smout AJ.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Aug;24(8):e364-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01949.x. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

PMID:
22672410
14.

Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using concurrent videofluoroscopy and manometry.

Pouderoux P, Shi G, Tatum RP, Kahrilas PJ.

Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jun;94(6):1457-63.

PMID:
10364007
15.
16.

Evaluation of esophageal high-resolution manometry in awake and sedated dogs.

Kempf J, Heinrich H, Reusch CE, Kook PH.

Am J Vet Res. 2013 Jun;74(6):895-900. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.74.6.895.

PMID:
23718658
17.

High-resolution manometric evaluation of the effects of cisapride on the esophagus during administration of solid and liquid boluses in awake healthy dogs.

Ullal TV, Kass PH, Conklin JL, Belafsky PC, Marks SL.

Am J Vet Res. 2016 Aug;77(8):818-27. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.8.818.

PMID:
27463544
18.

Anxiety can significantly explain bolus perception in the context of hypotensive esophageal motility: Results of a large multicenter study in asymptomatic individuals.

Cisternas D, Scheerens C, Omari T, Monrroy H, Hani A, Leguizamo A, Bilder C, Ditaranto A, Ruiz de León A, Pérez de la Serna J, Valdovinos MA, Coello R, Abrahao L, Remes-Troche J, Meixueiro A, Zavala MA, Marin I, Serra J.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Sep;29(9). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13088. Epub 2017 May 7.

PMID:
28480513
19.

Normal esophageal high-resolution manometry and impedance values in the supine and sitting positions in the population of Northern China.

Gao F, Gao Y, Hobson AR, Huang WN, Shang ZM.

Dis Esophagus. 2016 Apr;29(3):267-72. doi: 10.1111/dote.12320. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

PMID:
25516299
20.

Lack of correlation between HRM metrics and symptoms during the manometric protocol.

Xiao Y, Kahrilas PJ, Nicodème F, Lin Z, Roman S, Pandolfino JE.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;109(4):521-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.13. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

Supplemental Content

Support Center