Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 152

1.

Codon usage of highly expressed genes affects proteome-wide translation efficiency.

Frumkin I, Lajoie MJ, Gregg CJ, Hornung G, Church GM, Pilpel Y.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 22;115(21):E4940-E4949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719375115. Epub 2018 May 7.

2.

Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency.

Qian W, Yang JR, Pearson NM, Maclean C, Zhang J.

PLoS Genet. 2012;8(3):e1002603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002603. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

3.

Coevolution of codon usage and transfer RNA abundance.

Bulmer M.

Nature. 1987 Feb 19-25;325(6106):728-30.

PMID:
2434856
4.

Environmental perturbations lift the degeneracy of the genetic code to regulate protein levels in bacteria.

Subramaniam AR, Pan T, Cluzel P.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 5;110(6):2419-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211077110. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

5.

The Yin and Yang of codon usage.

Komar AA.

Hum Mol Genet. 2016 Oct 1;25(R2):R77-R85. Epub 2016 Jun 27. Review.

6.

Codon Bias Patterns of E. coli's Interacting Proteins.

Dilucca M, Cimini G, Semmoloni A, Deiana A, Giansanti A.

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 13;10(11):e0142127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142127. eCollection 2015.

7.

The Codon Usage of Lowly Expressed Genes Is Subject to Natural Selection.

Yannai A, Katz S, Hershberg R.

Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Apr 1;10(5):1237-1246. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy084.

8.

The Code of Silence: Widespread Associations Between Synonymous Codon Biases and Gene Function.

Supek F.

J Mol Evol. 2016 Jan;82(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00239-015-9714-8. Epub 2015 Nov 4. Review.

PMID:
26538122
9.

Codon usage bias from tRNA's point of view: redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization.

Rocha EP.

Genome Res. 2004 Nov;14(11):2279-86. Epub 2004 Oct 12. Erratum in: Genome Res. 2004 Dec;14(12):2510.

10.

Synonymous codon ordering: a subtle but prevalent strategy of bacteria to improve translational efficiency.

Shao ZQ, Zhang YM, Feng XY, Wang B, Chen JQ.

PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033547. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

11.

Effect of correlated tRNA abundances on translation errors and evolution of codon usage bias.

Shah P, Gilchrist MA.

PLoS Genet. 2010 Sep 16;6(9):e1001128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001128.

12.

Mutations to Less-Preferred Synonymous Codons in a Highly Expressed Gene of Escherichia coli: Fitness and Epistatic Interactions.

Hauber DJ, Grogan DW, DeBry RW.

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 4;11(1):e0146375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146375. eCollection 2016.

14.

On ribosome load, codon bias and protein abundance.

Klumpp S, Dong J, Hwa T.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048542. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

15.

Codon usage revisited: Lack of correlation between codon usage and the number of tRNA genes in enterobacteria.

Rojas J, Castillo G, Leiva LE, Elgamal S, Orellana O, Ibba M, Katz A.

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018 Aug 25;502(4):450-455. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.168. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

PMID:
29859934
16.

Effect of codon adaptation on codon-level and gene-level translation efficiency in vivo.

Nakahigashi K, Takai Y, Shiwa Y, Wada M, Honma M, Yoshikawa H, Tomita M, Kanai A, Mori H.

BMC Genomics. 2014 Dec 16;15:1115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1115.

17.
18.

Determinants of translation efficiency and accuracy.

Gingold H, Pilpel Y.

Mol Syst Biol. 2011 Apr 12;7:481. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.14. Review.

19.

Reassignment of a rare sense codon to a non-canonical amino acid in Escherichia coli.

Mukai T, Yamaguchi A, Ohtake K, Takahashi M, Hayashi A, Iraha F, Kira S, Yanagisawa T, Yokoyama S, Hoshi H, Kobayashi T, Sakamoto K.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Sep 18;43(16):8111-22. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv787. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

20.

The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella.

Brandis G, Hughes D.

PLoS Genet. 2016 Mar 10;12(3):e1005926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005926. eCollection 2016 Mar.

Supplemental Content

Support Center