Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

Debris extrusion and foraminal deformation produced by reciprocating instruments made of thermally treated NiTi wires.

Frota MMA, Bernardes RA, Vivan RR, Vivacqua-Gomes N, Duarte MAH, Vasconcelos BC.

J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 Jan 18;26:e20170215. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0215.

2.

Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.

Küçükyilmaz E, Savas S, Saygili G, Uysal B.

Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1-6. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

3.

Apical extrusion of debris from root canals using reciprocating files associated with two irrigation systems.

Xavier F, Nevares G, Romeiro MK, Gonçalves K, Gominho L, Albuquerque D.

Int Endod J. 2015 Jul;48(7):661-5. doi: 10.1111/iej.12362. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

PMID:
25088222
4.

Effect of coronal flaring on apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using single-file systems.

Topçuoğlu HS, Üstün Y, Akpek F, Aktı A, Topçuoğlu G.

Int Endod J. 2016 Sep;49(9):884-889. doi: 10.1111/iej.12520. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

PMID:
26283644
5.

Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.

Topçuoğlu HS, Aktı A, Tuncay Ö, Dinçer AN, Düzgün S, Topçuoğlu G.

J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):2066-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

PMID:
25443282
6.

The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems.

Borges ÁH, Pereira TM, Porto AN, de Araújo Estrela CR, Miranda Pedro FL, Aranha AM, Guedes OA.

J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):465-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 21.

PMID:
26614016
7.

Apical extrusion of debris using reciprocating files and rotary instrumentation systems.

Uzun I, Güler B, Özyürek T, Tunc T.

Niger J Clin Pract. 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):71-5. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.173715.

8.

Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.

Gergi R, Arbab-Chirani R, Osta N, Naaman A.

J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.039. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

PMID:
25069937
9.

Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals.

Topçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Akpek F, Topçuoğlu G, Aktı A.

Int Endod J. 2016 Jun;49(6):599-603. doi: 10.1111/iej.12484. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

PMID:
26084620
10.

Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems.

Silva EJ, Carapiá MF, Lopes RM, Belladonna FG, Senna PM, Souza EM, De-Deus G.

Int Endod J. 2016 Jul;49(7):700-5. doi: 10.1111/iej.12503. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

PMID:
26174577
11.

Efficacy of CM-Wire, M-Wire, and Nickel-Titanium Instruments for Removing Filling Material from Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.

Rodrigues CT, Duarte MA, de Almeida MM, de Andrade FB, Bernardineli N.

J Endod. 2016 Nov;42(11):1651-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 17.

PMID:
27651042
12.

Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.

Bürklein S, Schäfer E.

J Endod. 2012 Jun;38(6):850-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

PMID:
22595125
13.

Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.

Dincer AN, Er O, Canakci BC.

Int Endod J. 2015 Dec;48(12):1194-8. doi: 10.1111/iej.12425. Epub 2015 Jan 19.

PMID:
25557631
14.

Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments.

Topçuoğlu HS, Zan R, Akpek F, Topçuoğlu G, Ulusan Ö, Aktı A, Düzgün S, Ağırnaslıgil M.

Int Endod J. 2016 Dec;49(12):1183-1187. doi: 10.1111/iej.12572. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

PMID:
26547513
15.

Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.

Kuştarci A, Akpinar KE, Er K.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Feb;105(2):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.028.

PMID:
18230395
16.

Incidence of apical root cracks and apical dentinal detachments after canal preparation with hand and rotary files at different instrumentation lengths.

Liu R, Kaiwar A, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Hou B, Wu MK.

J Endod. 2013 Jan;39(1):129-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.019.

PMID:
23228272
17.

Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files.

Topçuoğlu G, Topçuoğlu HS, Akpek F.

Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;26(5):357-63. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12208. Epub 2015 Nov 5.

PMID:
26538300
18.
19.

Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems.

Kirchhoff AL, Fariniuk LF, Mello I.

J Endod. 2015 Feb;41(2):237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.023. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

PMID:
25447504
20.

Comparison of dentinal and apical crack formation caused by four different nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating systems in large and small canals.

Zhou X, Jiang S, Wang X, Wang S, Zhu X, Zhang C.

Dent Mater J. 2015;34(6):903-9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-197.

Supplemental Content

Support Center