Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

Cardiac cycle efficiency and dicrotic pressure variations: new parameters for fluid therapy: An observational study.

Messina A, Romano SM, Bonicolini E, Colombo D, Cammarota G, Chiostri M, Della Corte F, Navalesi P, Payen D, Romagnoli S.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Nov;34(11):755-763. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000661.

PMID:
28722695
2.

Dynamic arterial elastance as a predictor of arterial pressure response to fluid administration: a validation study.

García MI, Romero MG, Cano AG, Aya HD, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Cecconi M.

Crit Care. 2014 Nov 19;18(6):626. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0626-6.

3.

Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness†.

Mallat J, Meddour M, Durville E, Lemyze M, Pepy F, Temime J, Vangrunderbeeck N, Tronchon L, Thevenin D, Tavernier B.

Br J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;115(3):449-56. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev222. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

4.

Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach.

Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, Conte B, Mahjoub Y, Desebbe O, Pottecher J, Lakhal K, Benzekri-Lefevre D, Molinari N, Boulain T, Lefrant JY, Muller L; AzuRea Group.

Crit Care. 2014 Nov 4;18(6):587. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0587-9.

5.

Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.

Yonis H, Bitker L, Aublanc M, Perinel Ragey S, Riad Z, Lissonde F, Louf-Durier A, Debord S, Gobert F, Tapponnier R, Guérin C, Richard JC.

Crit Care. 2017 Dec 5;21(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1881-0.

6.

Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.

Geerts BF, Maas J, de Wilde RB, Aarts LP, Jansen JR.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Nov;28(11):802-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a67d2.

PMID:
21799416
7.

Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.

Trepte CJ, Eichhorn V, Haas SA, Stahl K, Schmid F, Nitzschke R, Goetz AE, Reuter DA.

Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):736-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet204. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

8.

Pulse pressure variation as a guide for volume expansion in dogs undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Fantoni DT, Ida KK, Gimenes AM, Mantovani MM, Castro JR, Patrício GCF, Ambrósio AM, Otsuki DA.

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017 Jul;44(4):710-718. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.11.011. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

PMID:
28734854
9.

The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ, Candela D, Zoric L, de La Coussaye JE, Jaber S, Lefrant JY.

Intensive Care Med. 2010 Mar;36(3):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1686-y. Epub 2009 Oct 22.

PMID:
19847400
10.

Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during experimental intra-abdominal hypertension.

Díaz F, Erranz B, Donoso A, Salomon T, Cruces P.

BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Sep 22;15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0105-x.

11.

A mini-fluid challenge of 150mL predicts fluid responsiveness using ModelflowR pulse contour cardiac output directly after cardiac surgery.

Smorenberg A, Cherpanath TGV, Geerts BF, de Wilde RBP, Jansen JRC, Maas JJ, Groeneveld ABJ.

J Clin Anesth. 2018 May;46:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.12.022. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

PMID:
29367093
12.

Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.

Biais M, Calderon J, Pernot M, Barandon L, Couffinhal T, Ouattara A, Sztark F.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1101-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.03.030. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

PMID:
24060469
13.

Hemodynamic Effect of Different Doses of Fluids for a Fluid Challenge: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Study.

Aya HD, Rhodes A, Chis Ster I, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, Cecconi M.

Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):e161-e168. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002067.

PMID:
27655325
14.

Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index.

Fischer MO, Pelissier A, Bohadana D, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1087-93. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

PMID:
23992654
15.

Assessment of the effect of rapid crystalloid infusion on stroke volume variation and pleth variability index after a preoperative fast.

Wajima Z, Shiga T, Imanaga K, Inoue T.

J Clin Monit Comput. 2010 Oct;24(5):385-9. doi: 10.1007/s10877-010-9259-8. Epub 2010 Aug 31.

PMID:
20803356
16.

Pulse pressure variation and prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes.

Oliveira-Costa CD, Friedman G, Vieira SR, Fialkow L.

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Jul;67(7):773-8.

17.

Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method.

Biais M, Cottenceau V, Stecken L, Jean M, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Sztark F.

Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1186-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc632.

PMID:
22425817
18.
19.

Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.

Stens J, Oeben J, Van Dusseldorp AA, Boer C.

J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Oct;30(5):587-94. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9759-7. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

20.

Mini-fluid Challenge of 100 ml of Crystalloid Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in the Operating Room.

Biais M, de Courson H, Lanchon R, Pereira B, Bardonneau G, Griton M, Sesay M, Nouette-Gaulain K.

Anesthesiology. 2017 Sep;127(3):450-456. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001753.

PMID:
28640019

Supplemental Content

Support Center