Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 856

1.

Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Drost FH, van Leenders GJ, Bokhorst LP, Bangma CH, Schoots IG.

BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):511-519. doi: 10.1111/bju.13836. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

2.

Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.

Pessoa RR, Viana PC, Mattedi RL, Guglielmetti GB, Cordeiro MD, Coelho RF, Nahas WC, Srougi M.

BJU Int. 2017 Apr;119(4):535-542. doi: 10.1111/bju.13624. Epub 2016 Sep 3.

3.

Reduction of MRI-targeted biopsies in men with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance by stratifying to PI-RADS and PSA-density, with different thresholds for significant disease.

Schoots IG, Osses DF, Drost FH, Verbeek JFM, Remmers S, van Leenders GJLH, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ.

Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):132-144. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.29.

4.

Characteristics of Prostate Cancer Found at Fifth Screening in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam: Can We Selectively Detect High-grade Prostate Cancer with Upfront Multivariable Risk Stratification and Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Alberts AR, Schoots IG, Bokhorst LP, Drost FH, van Leenders GJ, Krestin GP, Dwarkasing RS, Barentsz JO, Schröder FH, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ.

Eur Urol. 2017 Jun 21. pii: S0302-2838(17)30514-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.019. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
28647216
6.

Can multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict upgrading of transrectal ultrasound biopsy results at more definitive histology?

Abd-Alazeez M, Ahmed HU, Arya M, Allen C, Dikaios N, Freeman A, Emberton M, Kirkham A.

Urol Oncol. 2014 Aug;32(6):741-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

PMID:
24981993
7.

Early experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies under visual transrectal ultrasound guidance in patients suspicious for prostate cancer undergoing repeated biopsy.

Boesen L, Noergaard N, Chabanova E, Logager V, Balslev I, Mikines K, Thomsen HS.

Scand J Urol. 2015 Feb;49(1):25-34. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.925497. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

PMID:
24922550
8.

Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.

Hansen NL, Kesch C, Barrett T, Koo B, Radtke JP, Bonekamp D, Schlemmer HP, Warren AY, Wieczorek K, Hohenfellner M, Kastner C, Hadaschik B.

BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):631-638. doi: 10.1111/bju.13711. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

9.

Factors predicting prostate cancer upgrading on magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in an active surveillance population.

Lai WS, Gordetsky JB, Thomas JV, Nix JW, Rais-Bahrami S.

Cancer. 2017 Jun 1;123(11):1941-1948. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30548. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

10.

Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.

Alberts AR, Schoots IG, Bokhorst LP, van Leenders GJ, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ.

Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

PMID:
26651990
11.

Utility of early transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for risk stratification in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Voss J, Pal R, Ahmed S, Hannah M, Jaulim A, Walton T.

BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):863-870. doi: 10.1111/bju.14100. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

PMID:
29239082
12.

Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Choi YH, Kang MY, Sung HH, Jeon HG, Chang Jeong B, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e19-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

PMID:
30415878
13.

Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer.

Hansen NL, Barrett T, Kesch C, Pepdjonovic L, Bonekamp D, O'Sullivan R, Distler F, Warren A, Samel C, Hadaschik B, Grummet J, Kastner C.

BJU Int. 2018 Jul;122(1):40-49. doi: 10.1111/bju.14049. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

PMID:
29024425
14.

Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.

Radtke JP, Kuru TH, Bonekamp D, Freitag MT, Wolf MB, Alt CD, Hatiboglu G, Boxler S, Pahernik S, Roth W, Roethke MC, Schlemmer HP, Hohenfellner M, Hadaschik BA.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Sep;19(3):283-91. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.16. Epub 2016 May 17.

PMID:
27184812
15.

Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

Nassiri N, Margolis DJ, Natarajan S, Sharma DS, Huang J, Dorey FJ, Marks LS.

J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):632-639. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.070. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

16.

Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Bangma CH, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MG.

Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):438-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.037. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Review.

PMID:
25480312
17.

Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.

Radtke JP, Wiesenfarth M, Kesch C, Freitag MT, Alt CD, Celik K, Distler F, Roth W, Wieczorek K, Stock C, Duensing S, Roethke MC, Teber D, Schlemmer HP, Hohenfellner M, Bonekamp D, Hadaschik BA.

Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):888-896. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.039. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

PMID:
28400169
18.

Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.

Faiella E, Santucci D, Greco F, Frauenfelder G, Giacobbe V, Muto G, Zobel BB, Grasso RF.

Radiol Med. 2018 Feb;123(2):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0814-y. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

PMID:
29019021
19.

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies may improve diagnosis in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer.

Winther MD, Balslev I, Boesen L, Logager V, Noergaard N, Thestrup KD, Thomsen HS.

Dan Med J. 2017 May;64(5). pii: A5355.

PMID:
28552089
20.

Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.

Keefe DT, Schieda N, El Hallani S, Breau RH, Morash C, Robertson SJ, Mai KT, Belanger EC, Flood TA.

Virchows Arch. 2015 Oct;467(4):437-42. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1809-5. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

PMID:
26229020

Supplemental Content

Support Center