Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 106

1.

Importance of cochlear health for implant function.

Pfingst BE, Zhou N, Colesa DJ, Watts MM, Strahl SB, Garadat SN, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Budenz CL, Raphael Y, Zwolan TA.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 28. Review.

2.

Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.

Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Nov 4. Review.

3.

Considering optogenetic stimulation for cochlear implants.

Jeschke M, Moser T.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:224-34. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 16. Review.

PMID:
25601298
4.

Development and evaluation of the Nurotron 26-electrode cochlear implant system.

Zeng FG, Rebscher SJ, Fu QJ, Chen H, Sun X, Yin L, Ping L, Feng H, Yang S, Gong S, Yang B, Kang HY, Gao N, Chi F.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:188-99. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Oct 2. Review.

5.

The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.

Clark GM.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 24. Review.

6.

The early days of the multi channel cochlear implant: efforts and achievement in France.

Chouard CH.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Dec 10. Review.

PMID:
25499127
7.

Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.

Laback B, Egger K, Majdak P.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:138-50. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Oct 19. Review.

PMID:
25456088
8.

Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation.

Kan A, Litovsky RY.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:127-37. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Sep 2. Review.

9.

Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing.

Pfingst BE, Bowling SA, Colesa DJ, Garadat SN, Raphael Y, Shibata SB, Strahl SB, Su GL, Zhou N.

Hear Res. 2011 Nov;281(1-2):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 May 14. Review.

10.

The contributions of William F. House to the field of implantable auditory devices.

Eisenberg LS.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:52-6. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 23. Review.

PMID:
25159272
11.

Auditory midbrain implant: research and development towards a second clinical trial.

Lim HH, Lenarz T.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:212-23. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 20. Review.

12.

Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

Svirsky MA, Talavage TM, Sinha S, Neuburger H, Azadpour M.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

13.

Getting a decent (but sparse) signal to the brain for users of cochlear implants.

Wilson BS.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:24-38. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Dec 9. Review.

14.

Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.

Schatzer R, Koroleva I, Griessner A, Levin S, Kusovkov V, Yanov Y, Zierhofer C.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 29.

PMID:
25457654
15.

PET-imaging of brain plasticity after cochlear implantation.

Strelnikov K, Marx M, Lagleyre S, Fraysse B, Deguine O, Barone P.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 16. Review.

PMID:
25448166
16.

Factors constraining the benefit to speech understanding of combining information from low-frequency hearing and a cochlear implant.

Dorman MF, Cook S, Spahr A, Zhang T, Loiselle L, Schramm D, Whittingham J, Gifford R.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 5.

17.

Current focussing in cochlear implants: an analysis of neural recruitment in a computational model.

Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.12.004. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

PMID:
25528491
18.

A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.

Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T.

Hear Res. 2017 Feb;344:50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

PMID:
27838372
19.

Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Shannon RV.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 17. Review.

20.

Early UCSF contributions to the development of multiple-channel cochlear implants.

Merzenich MM.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 3. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center