Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 72

1.

Does prevalence matter to physicians in estimating post-test probability of disease? A randomized trial.

Agoritsas T, Courvoisier DS, Combescure C, Deom M, Perneger TV.

J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):373-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1540-5. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

2.

A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: the effect on physicians' post-test probability estimates.

Puhan MA, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, ter Riet G.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 2;143(3):184-9.

PMID:
16061916
3.
4.
5.

The influence of types of decision support on physicians' decision making.

Sox CM, Doctor JN, Koepsell TD, Christakis DA.

Arch Dis Child. 2009 Mar;94(3):185-90. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.141903. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

PMID:
19131417
6.

Emergency physician practices and requirements regarding the medical screening examination of psychiatric patients.

Broderick KB, Lerner EB, McCourt JD, Fraser E, Salerno K.

Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Jan;9(1):88-92.

7.

A Randomised Assessment of Trainee Doctors' Understanding and Interpretation of Diagnostic Test Results.

Parker VL, Ritchie JE, Drake TM, Hookham J, Balasubramanian SP.

World J Surg. 2016 Jan;40(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3214-2.

PMID:
26306891
8.

[The diagnostic exercise test in coronary disease. Proposal for a more rigorous and efficacious interpretation].

Roquebrune JP, Morand P.

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1986 Feb;79(2):173-82. French.

PMID:
3085619
9.

Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice.

Paulo S, Mendes S, Vizinho R, Carneiro AV.

Rev Port Cardiol. 2004 Sep;23(9):1187-98. English, Portuguese.

PMID:
15587576
10.

Comparison of approaches to estimate confidence intervals of post-test probabilities of diagnostic test results in a nested case-control study.

van Zaane B, Vergouwe Y, Donders AR, Moons KG.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Oct 31;12:166. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-166.

11.

Quantitative evaluation of the diagnostic thinking process in medical students.

Noguchi Y, Matsui K, Imura H, Kiyota M, Fukui T.

J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Nov;17(11):839-44.

12.

Pretest expectations strongly influence interpretation of abnormal laboratory results and further management.

Houben PH, van der Weijden T, Winkens B, Winkens RA, Grol RP.

BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Feb 16;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-13.

13.

Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.

Stamey JD, Seaman JW, Young DM.

J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(1):93-108.

PMID:
17219757
14.

Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.

Steurer J, Fischer JE, Bachmann LM, Koller M, ter Riet G.

BMJ. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):824-6. Erratum in: BMJ 2002 Jun 8;324(7350):1391.

15.

Visualizing the impact of prevalence on a diagnostic test.

Rehling M.

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2010 Oct;70(6):458-61. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2010.501382.

PMID:
20645678
16.

Post-test probability according to prevalence.

Galen BT.

J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct;26(10):1090; author reply 1091. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1787-5. No abstract available.

17.

Methodology of diagnostic tests in hepatology.

Christensen E.

Ann Hepatol. 2009 Jul-Sep;8(3):177-83. Review.

PMID:
19841495
18.

Do online information retrieval systems help experienced clinicians answer clinical questions?

Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, Gosling AS.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):315-21. Epub 2005 Jan 31.

19.

GPs' and physicians' interpretation of risks, benefits and diagnostic test results.

Heller RF, Sandars JE, Patterson L, McElduff P.

Fam Pract. 2004 Apr;21(2):155-9.

PMID:
15020384
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center