Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 781

1.

Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population.

McMullen MD, Kresovich S, Villeda HS, Bradbury P, Li H, Sun Q, Flint-Garcia S, Thornsberry J, Acharya C, Bottoms C, Brown P, Browne C, Eller M, Guill K, Harjes C, Kroon D, Lepak N, Mitchell SE, Peterson B, Pressoir G, Romero S, Oropeza Rosas M, Salvo S, Yates H, Hanson M, Jones E, Smith S, Glaubitz JC, Goodman M, Ware D, Holland JB, Buckler ES.

Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):737-40. doi: 10.1126/science.1174320.

2.

The genetic architecture of maize flowering time.

Buckler ES, Holland JB, Bradbury PJ, Acharya CB, Brown PJ, Browne C, Ersoz E, Flint-Garcia S, Garcia A, Glaubitz JC, Goodman MM, Harjes C, Guill K, Kroon DE, Larsson S, Lepak NK, Li H, Mitchell SE, Pressoir G, Peiffer JA, Rosas MO, Rocheford TR, Romay MC, Romero S, Salvo S, Sanchez Villeda H, da Silva HS, Sun Q, Tian F, Upadyayula N, Ware D, Yates H, Yu J, Zhang Z, Kresovich S, McMullen MD.

Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):714-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1174276.

3.

A first-generation haplotype map of maize.

Gore MA, Chia JM, Elshire RJ, Sun Q, Ersoz ES, Hurwitz BL, Peiffer JA, McMullen MD, Grills GS, Ross-Ibarra J, Ware DH, Buckler ES.

Science. 2009 Nov 20;326(5956):1115-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1177837.

4.

Genetics. A-maize-ing diversity.

Mackay TF.

Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):688-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1178420. No abstract available.

PMID:
19661410
5.

The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome.

Wright SI, Bi IV, Schroeder SG, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS.

Science. 2005 May 27;308(5726):1310-4. Erratum in: Science. 2005 Oct 7;310(5745):54.

6.

Paternal dominance of trans-eQTL influences gene expression patterns in maize hybrids.

Swanson-Wagner RA, DeCook R, Jia Y, Bancroft T, Ji T, Zhao X, Nettleton D, Schnable PS.

Science. 2009 Nov 20;326(5956):1118-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1178294.

7.

Identification of functional genetic variations underlying drought tolerance in maize using SNP markers.

Hao Z, Li X, Xie C, Weng J, Li M, Zhang D, Liang X, Liu L, Liu S, Zhang S.

J Integr Plant Biol. 2011 Aug;53(8):641-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01051.x. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

PMID:
21564545
8.

Natural variation in maize architecture is mediated by allelic differences at the PINOID co-ortholog barren inflorescence2.

Pressoir G, Brown PJ, Zhu W, Upadyayula N, Rocheford T, Buckler ES, Kresovich S.

Plant J. 2009 May;58(4):618-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03802.x. Epub 2009 Jan 19.

9.

Flowering time in maize: linkage and epistasis at a major effect locus.

Durand E, Bouchet S, Bertin P, Ressayre A, Jamin P, Charcosset A, Dillmann C, Tenaillon MI.

Genetics. 2012 Apr;190(4):1547-62. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.136903. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

10.

Mapping of quantitative trait locus associated with maize tolerance to high seed drying temperature.

Salgado KC, Von Pinho EV, Guimarães CT, Von Pinho RG, Ferreira CA, Andrade V.

Genet Mol Res. 2008;7(4):1319-26.

11.

[Genetic analysis of segregation distortion of molecular markers in maize F2 population].

Yan JB, Tang H, Huang YQ, Zheng YL, Li JS.

Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2003 Oct;30(10):913-8. Chinese.

PMID:
14669507
12.

[QTL mapping of five agronomic traits in maize].

Tang H, Yan JB, Huang YQ, Zheng YL, Li JS.

Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2005 Feb;32(2):203-9. Chinese.

PMID:
15759869
13.

Genome-wide meta-analysis of maize heterosis reveals the potential role of additive gene expression at pericentromeric loci.

Thiemann A, Fu J, Seifert F, Grant-Downton RT, Schrag TA, Pospisil H, Frisch M, Melchinger AE, Scholten S.

BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Apr 2;14:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-88.

14.

Exploring the genetic characteristics of two recombinant inbred line populations via high-density SNP markers in maize.

Pan Q, Ali F, Yang X, Li J, Yan J.

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052777. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

15.

Genetic architecture of rind penetrometer resistance in two maize recombinant inbred line populations.

Li K, Yan J, Li J, Yang X.

BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Jun 3;14:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-152.

16.

QTL mapping for plant architecture traits in upland cotton using RILs and SSR markers.

Wang BH, Wu YT, Huang NT, Zhu XF, Guo WZ, Zhang TZ.

Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2006 Feb;33(2):161-70.

PMID:
16529300
17.

Linkage disequilibrium with linkage analysis of multiline crosses reveals different multiallelic QTL for hybrid performance in the flint and dent heterotic groups of maize.

Giraud H, Lehermeier C, Bauer E, Falque M, Segura V, Bauland C, Camisan C, Campo L, Meyer N, Ranc N, Schipprack W, Flament P, Melchinger AE, Menz M, Moreno-González J, Ouzunova M, Charcosset A, Schön CC, Moreau L.

Genetics. 2014 Dec;198(4):1717-34. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.169367. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

18.

High segregation distortion in maize B73 x teosinte crosses.

Wang G, He QQ, Xu ZK, Song RT.

Genet Mol Res. 2012 Mar 19;11(1):693-706. doi: 10.4238/2012.March.19.3.

19.

[Maize domestication and breeding based on genomic variation].

Yamasaki M.

Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso. 2007 Dec;52(15):1942-6. Review. Japanese. No abstract available.

PMID:
18064883
20.

Diversity of chromosomal karyotypes in maize and its relatives.

Albert PS, Gao Z, Danilova TV, Birchler JA.

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2010 Jul;129(1-3):6-16. doi: 10.1159/000314342. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

PMID:
20551613

Supplemental Content

Support Center