Format

Send to

Choose Destination
North Clin Istanb. 2015 Sep 24;2(2):107-114. doi: 10.14744/nci.2015.69885. eCollection 2015.

Evaluation of the prescriptions written for upper respiratory tract infections.

Author information

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

We aimed to determine frequency of antibiotic use and retrospectively evaluate prescriptions written for the patients with diagnosis of acute pharyngitis, acute nasopharyngitis and acute tonsillitis by our hospital emergency department physicians in January 2014.

METHODS:

Records of the patients who were admitted to the education and research hospital between January 1st, 2014 to January 31st 2014 were analyzed in this study. Records of all the patients with the diagnosis of acute nasopharyngitis (J.00), acute pharyngitis (J.02) and acute tonsillitis (J.03) were analyzed, and patients with a second diagnosis or haven't any prescription were excluded from the study. Frequency of antibiotic and other symptomatic medications use were analyzed in prescriptions of 5261 patients.

RESULTS:

Antibiotics were prescribed for 63.5% of the patients included in the study, and the most preferred antibiotics were penicilin and beta-lactamase combination (38.8%) and cephalosporins (26.2%). Combined preparations were the most preferred medications in symptomatic treatment (65.9%). Dexketoprofen was the most preferred among nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (63%). In each prescription, average number of 3.26 drugs were prescribed.

CONCLUSION:

Excessive and improrer use of antibiotics in the treatment of respiratuary tract infection is a global problem. The use of excess agents in symptomatic medication leads to polypharmacy. Training of physicians and patients on principles of rational drug use will contribute to the solution of this problem.

KEYWORDS:

Antibiotic use; emergency medicine; symptomatic medications; upper respiratory tract infections

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center