Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

Commensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster.

Sharon G, Segal D, Ringo JM, Hefetz A, Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):20051-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009906107. Epub 2010 Nov 1. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 19;110(12):4853.

2.

Symbiotic bacteria are responsible for diet-induced mating preference in Drosophila melanogaster, providing support for the hologenome concept of evolution.

Sharon G, Segal D, Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E.

Gut Microbes. 2011 May-Jun;2(3):190-2. Epub 2011 May 1.

PMID:
21804354
3.

Bacteria-induced sexual isolation in Drosophila.

Ringo J, Sharon G, Segal D.

Fly (Austin). 2011 Oct-Dec;5(4):310-5. doi: 10.4161/fly.5.4.15835. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

PMID:
21525789
4.

Variation in the male pheromones and mating success of wild caught Drosophila melanogaster.

Scott D, Shields A, Straker M, Dalrymple H, Dhillon PK, Harbinder S.

PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023645. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

5.

Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila montana: geographic variation, sexual dimorphism and potential roles as pheromones.

Jennings JH, Etges WJ, Schmitt T, Hoikkala A.

J Insect Physiol. 2014 Feb;61:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

PMID:
24373710
6.

Specialized cells tag sexual and species identity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Billeter JC, Atallah J, Krupp JJ, Millar JG, Levine JD.

Nature. 2009 Oct 15;461(7266):987-91. doi: 10.1038/nature08495.

PMID:
19829381
7.

Gut microbiomes and reproductive isolation in Drosophila.

Leftwich PT, Clarke NVE, Hutchings MI, Chapman T.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12767-12772. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708345114. Epub 2017 Nov 6. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 20;:.

8.

The impacts of Wolbachia and the microbiome on mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.

Arbuthnott D, Levin TC, Promislow DE.

J Evol Biol. 2016 Feb;29(2):461-8. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12788. Epub 2015 Nov 28.

9.

Frequent replenishment sustains the beneficial microbiome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Blum JE, Fischer CN, Miles J, Handelsman J.

MBio. 2013 Nov 5;4(6):e00860-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00860-13.

10.

'Does my Diet Affect my Perfume?' Identification and Quantification of Cuticular Compounds in Five Drosophila melanogaster Strains Maintained over 300 Generations on Different Diets.

Pavković-Lučić S, Todosijević M, Savić T, Vajs V, Trajković J, Anđelković B, Lučić L, Krstić G, Makarov S, Tomić V, Miličić D, Vujisić L.

Chem Biodivers. 2016 Feb;13(2):224-32. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201500064.

PMID:
26880435
11.

Natural variation in the strength and direction of male mating preferences for female pheromones in Drosophila melanogaster.

Pischedda A, Shahandeh MP, Cochrane WG, Cochrane VA, Turner TL.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e87509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087509. eCollection 2014.

12.

Variation in male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.

Edward DA, Chapman T.

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056299. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

13.

Mate recognition: should fly stay or should fly go?

Mehren JE.

Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 3;17(7):R240-2.

14.

Gr33a modulates Drosophila male courtship preference.

Hu Y, Han Y, Shao Y, Wang X, Ma Y, Ling E, Xue L.

Sci Rep. 2015 Jan 14;5:7777. doi: 10.1038/srep07777.

15.

Gut Microbiota Modifies Olfactory-Guided Microbial Preferences and Foraging Decisions in Drosophila.

Wong AC, Wang QP, Morimoto J, Senior AM, Lihoreau M, Neely GG, Simpson SJ, Ponton F.

Curr Biol. 2017 Aug 7;27(15):2397-2404.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

17.

Effect of antibiotic treatment and gamma-irradiation on cuticular hydrocarbon profiles and mate choice in tsetse flies (Glossina m. morsitans).

Engl T, Michalkova V, Weiss BL, Uzel GD, Takac P, Miller WJ, Abd-Alla AMM, Aksoy S, Kaltenpoth M.

BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18(Suppl 1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1292-7.

18.

Evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons of Hawaiian Drosophilidae.

Alves H, Rouault JD, Kondoh Y, Nakano Y, Yamamoto D, Kim YK, Jallon JM.

Behav Genet. 2010 Sep;40(5):694-705. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9364-y. Epub 2010 May 18.

PMID:
20480222
19.

Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.

Gosden TP, Reddiex AJ, Chenoweth SF.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 22;115(21):5498-5503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720368115. Epub 2018 May 7.

20.

Female Choice or Male Sex Drive? The Advantages of Male Body Size during Mating in Drosophila Melanogaster.

Jagadeeshan S, Shah U, Chakrabarti D, Singh RS.

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144672. eCollection 2015.

Supplemental Content

Support Center