Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 105

1.

The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence public health guidance on behaviour change: a brief introduction.

Abraham C, Kelly MP, West R, Michie S.

Psychol Health Med. 2009 Jan;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/13548500802537903.

PMID:
19085307
2.

A conceptual framework for public health: NICE's emerging approach.

Kelly MP, Stewart E, Morgan A, Killoran A, Fischer A, Threlfall A, Bonnefoy J.

Public Health. 2009 Jan;123(1):e14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.10.031. Epub 2008 Dec 18.

3.

Designing and implementing behaviour change interventions to improve population health.

Michie S.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Oct;13 Suppl 3:64-9. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008014.

PMID:
18806194
4.

Adaptive e-learning to improve dietary behaviour: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Harris J, Felix L, Miners A, Murray E, Michie S, Ferguson E, Free C, Lock K, Landon J, Edwards P.

Health Technol Assess. 2011 Oct;15(37):1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta15370. Review.

5.

Public and patient involvement at the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

Barham L.

Patient. 2011;4(1):1-10. doi: 10.2165/11586090-000000000-00000. Review.

PMID:
21766889
6.

Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England.

Kelly M, Morgan A, Ellis S, Younger T, Huntley J, Swann C.

Soc Sci Med. 2010 Sep;71(6):1056-62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.032. Epub 2010 Jul 14. Review.

PMID:
20678836
7.

Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.

Christie D, Thompson R, Sawtell M, Allen E, Cairns J, Smith F, Jamieson E, Hargreaves K, Ingold A, Brooks L, Wiggins M, Oliver S, Jones R, Elbourne D, Santos A, Wong IC, O'Neill S, Strange V, Hindmarsh P, Annan F, Viner R.

Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.

8.

Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development.

Claxton K, Palmer S, Longworth L, Bojke L, Griffin S, McKenna C, Soares M, Spackman E, Youn J.

Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(46):1-323. doi: 10.3310/hta16460.

9.

Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

10.

Pipelineā„¢ embolization device for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: a NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Withers K, Carolan-Rees G, Dale M.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Feb;11(1):5-13. doi: 10.1007/s40258-012-0005-x. Review.

11.

The process of developing evidence-based guidance in medicine and public health: a qualitative study of views from the inside.

Atkins L, Smith JA, Kelly MP, Michie S.

Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 4;8:101. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-101.

13.

Methods for the Development of NICE Public Health Guidance [Internet].

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2012 Sep 26.

14.

NICE public health guidance: what's new?

Killoran A, White P, Owen L, Fischer A, Millward L.

J Public Health (Oxf). 2009 Mar;31(1):184-6. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdn117. Epub 2009 Jan 18. No abstract available.

PMID:
19153093
15.

The clinical effectiveness of individual behaviour change interventions to reduce risky sexual behaviour after a negative human immunodeficiency virus test in men who have sex with men: systematic and realist reviews and intervention development.

Flowers P, Wu O, Lorimer K, Ahmed B, Hesselgreaves H, MacDonald J, Cayless S, Hutchinson S, Elliott L, Sullivan A, Clutterbuck D, Rayment M, McDaid L.

Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(5):1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta21050.

16.

The use of exploratory analyses within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence single technology appraisal process: an evaluation and qualitative analysis.

Kaltenthaler E, Carroll C, Hill-McManus D, Scope A, Holmes M, Rice S, Rose M, Tappenden P, Woolacott N.

Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(26):1-48. doi: 10.3310/hta20260.

17.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
18.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
19.

The contribution of advisory committees and public involvement to large studies: case study.

Slade M, Bird V, Chandler R, Fox J, Larsen J, Tew J, Leamy M.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 2;10:323. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-323.

20.

What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.

Czoski-Murray C, Lloyd Jones M, McCabe C, Claxton K, Oluboyede Y, Roberts J, Nicholl JP, Rees A, Reilly CS, Young D, Fleming T.

Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center