Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 395

1.

Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs: minimum three-year follow-up of one hundred fourteen cases.

Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, Kim YJ, Buchowski JM, Cheh G, Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1598-604. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318178872a.

PMID:
18552676
2.

Apical vertebral derotation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: myth or reality?

Di Silvestre M, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G, Maredi E, Vommaro F, Pastorelli F.

Eur Spine J. 2013 Feb;22(2):313-23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2372-2. Epub 2012 Aug 7.

3.

Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, Bridwell KH, Cho SK, Cheh G, Sides B.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 1;31(3):291-8.

PMID:
16449901
4.

Anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion for moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study.

Wang Y, Fei Q, Qiu G, Lee CI, Shen J, Zhang J, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Wang H, Yuan S.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 15;33(20):2166-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318185798d.

PMID:
18794757
5.

Comparative analysis of hook, hybrid, and pedicle screw instrumentation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Yilmaz G, Borkhuu B, Dhawale AA, Oto M, Littleton AG, Mason DE, Gabos PG, Shah SA.

J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(5):490-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318250c629.

PMID:
22706465
6.

Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary?

Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Schootman M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2061-7.

PMID:
16166896
7.

Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks. Results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jun 15;22(12):1369-79.

PMID:
9201841
9.

Posterior correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with pedicle screw instrumentation: results of 48 patients with minimal 10-year follow-up.

Min K, Sdzuy C, Farshad M.

Eur Spine J. 2013 Feb;22(2):345-54. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2533-3. Epub 2012 Oct 13.

10.

Monaxial versus multiaxial thoracic pedicle screws in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Polly DW Jr, Lenke LG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2113-20.

PMID:
16166904
11.

Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.

Di Silvestre M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F, Vommaro F, Martikos K, Parisini P.

Eur Spine J. 2008 Oct;17(10):1336-49. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0731-9. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

12.

All-pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a comparative radiographical study with a minimum 2-Year follow-up.

Crawford AH, Lykissas MG, Gao X, Eismann E, Anadio J.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1199-208. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ce597.

PMID:
23429683
13.

Comparison of surgical treatment in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle fixation surgery: a comparison of two practices.

Geck MJ, Rinella A, Hawthorne D, Macagno A, Koester L, Sides B, Bridwell K, Lenke L, Shufflebarger H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1942-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a3c777.

PMID:
19680102
14.

Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screws--which provides better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Cheng I, Kim Y, Gupta MC, Bridwell KH, Hurford RK, Lee SS, Theerajunyaporn T, Lenke LG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2104-12.

PMID:
16166903
15.

Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs.

Lowenstein JE, Matsumoto H, Vitale MG, Weidenbaum M, Gomez JA, Lee FY, Hyman JE, Roye DP Jr.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):448-52.

PMID:
17304136
16.

The posterior pedicle screw construct: 5-year results for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves.

Bennett JT, Hoashi JS, Ames RJ, Kimball JS, Pahys JM, Samdani AF.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Dec;19(6):658-63. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12816. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

PMID:
24074506
17.

Effectiveness of cross-linking posterior segmental instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2-year follow-up comparative study.

Dhawale AA, Shah SA, Yorgova P, Neiss G, Layer DJ Jr, Rogers KJ, Gabos PG, Holmes L Jr.

Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1485-92. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.022. Epub 2013 Jun 22.

PMID:
23800823
18.

Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up.

Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, Kim JH, Kim SS.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1602-9.

PMID:
16025028
19.

Restoration of thoracic kyphosis by posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparative radiographic analysis of two methods of reduction.

Clement JL, Chau E, Kimkpe C, Vallade MJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1579-87. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817886be.

PMID:
18552674
20.

Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Blanke K.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 15;29(18):2040-8. Review.

PMID:
15371706

Supplemental Content

Support Center