Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 964

1.
2.
3.

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O'brien MJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Levin TR, Bond JH, Brooks D, Byers T, Hyman N, Kirk L, Thorson A, Simmang C, Johnson D, Rex DK.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 May-Jun;56(3):143-59; quiz 184-5.

4.

Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans.

Chung SJ, Kim YS, Yang SY, Song JH, Kim D, Park MJ, Kim SG, Song IS, Kim JS.

Gut. 2011 Nov;60(11):1537-43. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.232876. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

PMID:
21427200
5.

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O'Brien MJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Levin TR, Bond JH, Brooks D, Byers T, Hyman N, Kirk L, Thorson A, Simmang C, Johnson D, Rex DK; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.; American Cancer Society..

Gastroenterology. 2006 May;130(6):1872-85. Review.

PMID:
16697750
6.

Systematic literature review and pooled analyses of risk factors for finding adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy.

de Jonge V, Sint Nicolaas J, van Leerdam ME, Kuipers EJ, Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ.

Endoscopy. 2011 Jul;43(7):560-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256306. Epub 2011 Mar 24. Review.

PMID:
21437854
7.

Predictive value of morphologic characteristics in rectosigmoid adenomatous polyps for the probability of synchronous polyps or cancer in the proximal colon.

Erdem L, Akbayir N, Yildirim S, Köksal HM, Yenice N, Gültekin OS, Sakiz D, Peker O.

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec;16(4):207-11.

8.

Colonoscopic surveillance of patients with a family history of colon cancer and a history of normal colonoscopy: is a five-year interval between colonoscopies appropriate?

Schoenfeld PS, Fincher RK; Military Colorectal Cancer Screening Trials Group..

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Jul;1(4):310-4.

PMID:
15017673
9.

Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy.

Read TE, Read JD, Butterly LF.

N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 2;336(1):8-12.

10.

Predictors of the early development of advanced metachronous colon adenomas.

Triantafyllou K, Papatheodoridis GV, Paspatis GA, Vasilakaki TH, Elemenoglou I, Karamanolis DG.

Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Mar-Apr;44(14):533-8.

PMID:
9164533
11.

Clinical significance of small polyps found during screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Farraye FA, Wallace M.

Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002 Jan;12(1):41-51. Review.

PMID:
11916160
12.

Flat adenomas in the National Polyp Study: is there increased risk for high-grade dysplasia initially or during surveillance?

O'brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Bushey MT, Sternberg SS, Gottlieb LS, Bond JH, Waye JD, Schapiro M; National Polyp Study Workgroup..

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Oct;2(10):905-11.

PMID:
15476154
13.

Three randomized long-term surveillance trials in patients with sporadic colorectal adenomas.

Kronborg O, Jørgensen OD, Fenger C, Rasmussen M.

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;41(6):737-43.

PMID:
16716975
14.

[Advanced adenoma in 3700 colonoscopies].

Barreda Costa C, Vila Gutierrez S, Salazar Cabrera F, Barriga Calle E, Velarde Criado H, Barriga Briceño J.

Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2010 Apr-Jun;30(2):113-20. Spanish.

PMID:
20644602
15.

The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination.

Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Church T, Yokochi LA, Doria-Rose VP, Prorok P.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jan;7(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.07.014. Epub 2008 Jul 26.

PMID:
18829395
16.

Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ, Ho MN, Gottlieb L, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Bond J, Schapiro M, Stewart ET, et al.

N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 1;328(13):901-6.

17.

The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.

O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Diaz B, Dickersin GR, Ewing S, Geller S, Kasimian D, et al.

Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb;98(2):371-9.

PMID:
2403953
18.

Increased incidence of colorectal adenomas in follow-up evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed hyperplastic polyps.

Huang EH, Whelan RL, Gleason NR, Maeda JS, Terry MB, Lee SW, Neugut AI, Forde KA.

Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):646-8. Epub 2001 May 14.

PMID:
11591960
19.

Significance of a normal surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a history of adenomatous polyps.

Blumberg D, Opelka FG, Hicks TC, Timmcke AE, Beck DE.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Aug;43(8):1084-91; discussion 1091-2.

PMID:
10950006
20.

Retrospective analysis of missed advanced adenomas on surveillance colonoscopy.

Shehadeh I, Rebala S, Kumar R, Markert RJ, Barde C, Gopalswamy N.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 May;97(5):1143-7.

PMID:
12014718

Supplemental Content

Support Center