Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Front Neurol. 2018 Jul 17;9:562. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00562. eCollection 2018.

Head-Movement-Emphasized Rehabilitation in Bilateral Vestibulopathy.

Author information

1
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar,Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
2
German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
3
Institute of Medical Technology, Brandenburgische Technische Universität, Cottbus, Germany.
4
Center for Sensorimotor Research, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
5
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Institute for Cognitive Systems, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
6
Department of Neurology,Schoen Clinic Bad Aibling, Bad Aibling, Germany.
7
Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

Objective: Although there is evidence that vestibular rehabilitation is useful for treating chronic bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH), the mechanisms for improvement, and the reasons why only some patients improve are still unclear. Clinical rehabilitation results and evidence fromeye-head control in vestibular deficiency suggest that headmovement is a crucial element of vestibular rehabilitation. In this study, we assess the effects of a specifically designed head-movement-based rehabilitation program on dynamic vision, and explore underlying mechanisms. Methods: Two adult patients (patients 1 and 2) with chronic BVH underwent two 4-week interventions: (1) head-movement-emphasized rehabilitation (HME) with exercises based on active head movements, and (2) eye-movement-only rehabilitation (EMO), a control intervention with sham exercises without head movement. In a double-blind crossover design, the patients were randomized to first undergo EMO (patient 1) and-after a 4-week washout-HME, and vice-versa (patient 2). Before each intervention and after a 4-week follow-up patients' dynamic vision, vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, as well as re-fixation saccade behavior during passive headmotion were assessed with the head impulse testing device-functional test (HITD-FT). Results: HME, not EMO, markedly improved perception with dynamic vision during passive head motion (HITD-FT score) increasing from 0 to 60% (patient 1) and 75% (patient 2). There was a combination of enhanced VOR, as well as improved saccadic compensation. Conclusion: Head movement seems to be an important element of rehabilitation for BVH. It improves dynamic vision with a combined VOR and compensatory saccade enhancement.

KEYWORDS:

HITD-FT; bilateral vestibular hypofunction; dynamic vision; re-fixation saccades; vestibular rehabilitation; vestibulo-ocular reflex

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center