Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 155

1.
2.

No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities.

Damsma A, Taatgen N, de Jong R, van Rijn H.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Sep 4. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01851-z. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31485992
3.

Eliciting contextual temporal calibration: The effect of bottom-up and top-down information in reproduction tasks.

Maaß SC, Schlichting N, van Rijn H.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Aug;199:102898. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102898. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

PMID:
31369983
4.

Timing deficiencies in amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: Disentangling clock and memory processes.

Maaß SC, Riemer M, Wolbers T, van Rijn H.

Behav Brain Res. 2019 Nov 5;373:112110. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112110. Epub 2019 Jul 21.

5.

Keeping Bystanders Active: Resuscitating Resuscitation Skills.

Maaß SC, Sense F, Gluck KA, van Rijn H.

Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;7:177. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00177. eCollection 2019.

6.

Core body temperature speeds up temporal processing and choice behavior under deadlines.

van Maanen L, van der Mijn R, van Beurden MHPH, Roijendijk LMM, Kingma BRM, Miletić S, van Rijn H.

Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 11;9(1):10053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46073-3.

7.

Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data.

van Rij J, Hendriks P, van Rijn H, Baayen RH, Wood SN.

Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519832483. doi: 10.1177/2331216519832483.

8.

Effects of elaborate feedback during practice tests: Costs and benefits of retrieval prompts.

van den Broek GSE, Segers E, van Rijn H, Takashima A, Verhoeven L.

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Apr 18. doi: 10.1037/xap0000212. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30998028
9.

1-s Productions: A Validation of an Efficient Measure of Clock Variability.

Maaß SC, van Rijn H.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Dec 21;12:519. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00519. eCollection 2018.

10.

The observed locus of semantic interference may not coincide with the functional locus of semantic interference: A commentary on Shitova et al.

van Maanen L, van Rijn H.

Cortex. 2019 Feb;111:327-332. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Nov 10. No abstract available.

PMID:
30497663
11.

The dynamic effect of context on interval timing in children and adults.

Hallez Q, Damsma A, Rhodes D, van Rijn H, Droit-Volet S.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

PMID:
30458315
12.

An Automated Method to Determine the Performance of Drosophila in Response to Temperature Changes in Space and Time.

Soto-Padilla A, Ruijsink R, Span M, van Rijn H, Billeter JC.

J Vis Exp. 2018 Oct 12;(140). doi: 10.3791/58350.

PMID:
30371661
13.

Towards Ecologically Valid Interval Timing.

van Rijn H.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Oct;22(10):850-852. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.008.

PMID:
30266145
14.

Robustness of individual differences in temporal interference effects.

Schlichting N, de Jong R, van Rijn H.

PLoS One. 2018 Aug 14;13(8):e0202345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202345. eCollection 2018.

15.

Performance-informed EEG analysis reveals mixed evidence for EEG signatures unique to the processing of time.

Schlichting N, de Jong R, van Rijn H.

Psychol Res. 2018 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1039-y. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
29926169
16.

Probabilistic motor sequence learning in a virtual reality serial reaction time task.

Sense F, van Rijn H.

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 12;13(6):e0198759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198759. eCollection 2018.

17.

Neural markers of memory consolidation do not predict temporal estimates of encoded items.

Damsma A, van der Mijn R, van Rijn H.

Neuropsychologia. 2018 Aug;117:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.039. Epub 2018 May 3.

18.

Thermosensory perception regulates speed of movement in response to temperature changes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Soto-Padilla A, Ruijsink R, Sibon OCM, van Rijn H, Billeter JC.

J Exp Biol. 2018 May 22;221(Pt 10). pii: jeb174151. doi: 10.1242/jeb.174151.

19.

Temporal Context Influences the Perceived Duration of Everyday Actions: Assessing the Ecological Validity of Lab-Based Timing Phenomena.

Schlichting N, Damsma A, Aksoy EE, Wächter M, Asfour T, van Rijn H.

J Cogn. 2018 Jan 9;2(1):1. doi: 10.5334/joc.4.

20.

What You See Is What You Remember: Visual Chunking by Temporal Integration Enhances Working Memory.

Akyürek EG, Kappelmann N, Volkert M, van Rijn H.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Dec;29(12):2025-2036. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01175. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

PMID:
28777057
21.

Driving and Multitasking: The Good, the Bad, and the Dangerous.

Nijboer M, Borst JP, van Rijn H, Taatgen NA.

Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 8;7:1718. eCollection 2016.

22.

Pupillary response indexes the metrical hierarchy of unattended rhythmic violations.

Damsma A, van Rijn H.

Brain Cogn. 2017 Feb;111:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

PMID:
27816784
23.

Contrasting single and multi-component working-memory systems in dual tasking.

Nijboer M, Borst J, van Rijn H, Taatgen N.

Cogn Psychol. 2016 May;86:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

PMID:
26859518
24.

An Individual's Rate of Forgetting is Stable Over Time but Differs Across Materials.

Sense F, Behrens F, Meijer RR, van Rijn H.

Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;8(1):305-21. doi: 10.1111/tops.12183. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

25.

Of monkeys and men: Impatience in perceptual decision-making.

Boehm U, Hawkins GE, Brown S, van Rijn H, Wagenmakers EJ.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Jun;23(3):738-49. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0958-5. Review.

26.

Validation of a simple response-time measure of listening effort.

Pals C, Sarampalis A, van Rijn H, Başkent D.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Sep;138(3):EL187-92. doi: 10.1121/1.4929614.

PMID:
26428811
27.

Single trial beta oscillations index time estimation.

Kononowicz TW, van Rijn H.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:381-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

28.

Neuroelectromagnetic signatures of the reproduction of supra-second durations.

Kononowicz TW, Sander T, van Rijn H.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:201-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

29.

Using data-driven model-brain mappings to constrain formal models of cognition.

Borst JP, Nijboer M, Taatgen NA, van Rijn H, Anderson JR.

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):e0119673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119673. eCollection 2015.

30.

The effect of horizontal eye movements on free recall: a preregistered adversarial collaboration.

Matzke D, Nieuwenhuis S, van Rijn H, Slagter HA, van der Molen MW, Wagenmakers EJ.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):e1-15. doi: 10.1037/xge0000038.

PMID:
25621378
31.

Oscillatory multiplexing of neural population codes for interval timing and working memory.

Gu BM, van Rijn H, Meck WH.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Jan;48:160-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 18. Review.

PMID:
25454354
32.

Dedicated clock/timing-circuit theories of time perception and timed performance.

van Rijn H, Gu BM, Meck WH.

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;829:75-99. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1782-2_5. Review.

PMID:
25358706
33.

Fronto-parietal network oscillations reveal relationship between working memory capacity and cognitive control.

Gulbinaite R, van Rijn H, Cohen MX.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 30;8:761. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00761. eCollection 2014.

34.

It's time to take the psychology of biological time into account: speed of driving affects a trip's subjective duration.

van Rijn H.

Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 16;5:1028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01028. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.

35.

How to assess the existence of competing strategies in cognitive tasks: a primer on the fixed-point property.

van Maanen L, de Jong R, van Rijn H.

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 29;9(8):e106113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106113. eCollection 2014.

36.

Single-task fMRI overlap predicts concurrent multitasking interference.

Nijboer M, Borst J, van Rijn H, Taatgen N.

Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:60-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.082. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

PMID:
24911376
37.

Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Gulbinaite R, Johnson A, de Jong R, Morey CC, van Rijn H.

Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.060. Epub 2014 May 27.

PMID:
24878830
38.

Two visual targets for the price of one? Pupil dilation shows reduced mental effort through temporal integration.

Wolff MJ, Scholz S, Akyürek EG, van Rijn H.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):251-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0667-5.

PMID:
24841237
39.

Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution.

Boehm U, van Maanen L, Forstmann B, van Rijn H.

Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 1;96:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.063. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

PMID:
24699015
40.

Decoupling interval timing and climbing neural activity: a dissociation between CNV and N1P2 amplitudes.

Kononowicz TW, van Rijn H.

J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 19;34(8):2931-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2523-13.2014.

41.

Decision making in concurrent multitasking: do people adapt to task interference?

Nijboer M, Taatgen NA, Brands A, Borst JP, van Rijn H.

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 11;8(11):e79583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079583. eCollection 2013.

42.

Word frequency and the attentional blink: the effects of target difficulty on retrieval and consolidation processes.

Wierda SM, Taatgen NA, van Rijn H, Martens S.

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 3;8(9):e73415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073415. eCollection 2013.

43.

Avoiding the problem state bottleneck by strategic use of the environment.

Borst JP, Buwalda TA, van Rijn H, Taatgen NA.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.016. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

PMID:
23973793
44.

How WM load influences linguistic processing in adults: a computational model of pronoun interpretation in discourse.

van Rij J, van Rijn H, Hendriks P.

Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):564-80. doi: 10.1111/tops.12029. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

45.

Pupil dilation co-varies with memory strength of individual traces in a delayed response paired-associate task.

van Rijn H, Dalenberg JR, Borst JP, Sprenger SA.

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051134. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

46.

What eye movements can tell about theory of mind in a strategic game.

Meijering B, van Rijn H, Taatgen NA, Verbrugge R.

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045961. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

47.

Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution.

Wierda SM, van Rijn H, Taatgen NA, Martens S.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8456-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201858109. Epub 2012 May 14.

48.

Contingent negative variation and its relation to time estimation: a theoretical evaluation.

van Rijn H, Kononowicz TW, Meck WH, Ng KK, Penney TB.

Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Dec 27;5:91. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00091. eCollection 2011.

49.

RACE/A: an architectural account of the interactions between learning, task control, and retrieval dynamics.

van Maanen L, van Rijn H, Taatgen N.

Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):62-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01213.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

50.

Slow potentials in time estimation: the role of temporal accumulation and habituation.

Kononowicz TW, van Rijn H.

Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Sep 13;5:48. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00048. eCollection 2011.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center