Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 144

1.

Is the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer affected by whether women attend a steady-state screening program?

de Munck L, Fracheboud J, de Bock GH, den Heeten GJ, Siesling S, Broeders MJM.

Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):842-850. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31388. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

2.

Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening.

Holland K, Sechopoulos I, Mann RM, den Heeten GJ, van Gils CH, Karssemeijer N.

Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 28;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0917-3.

3.

The importance of early detection of calcifications associated with breast cancer in screening.

Mordang JJ, Gubern-Mérida A, Bria A, Tortorella F, Mann RM, Broeders MJM, den Heeten GJ, Karssemeijer N.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan;167(2):451-458. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4527-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

4.

Toward image quality assessment in mammography using model observers: Detection of a calcification-like object.

Bouwman RW, Mackenzie A, van Engen RE, Broeders MJM, Young KC, Dance DR, den Heeten GJ, Veldkamp WJH.

Med Phys. 2017 Nov;44(11):5726-5739. doi: 10.1002/mp.12532. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

PMID:
28837225
5.

Technical Note: Validation of two methods to determine contact area between breast and compression paddle in mammography.

Branderhorst W, de Groot JE, van Lier MGJTB, Highnam RP, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA.

Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):4040-4044. doi: 10.1002/mp.12392. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

PMID:
28569996
6.

The effect of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities on breast cancer mortality: 20 years of follow-up.

Sankatsing VDV, van Ravesteyn NT, Heijnsdijk EAM, Looman CWN, van Luijt PA, Fracheboud J, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJM, de Koning HJ.

Int J Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;141(4):671-677. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30754.

7.

Growth rate of invasive ductal carcinomas from a screened 50-74-year-old population.

Otten JD, van Schoor G, Peer PG, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, Broeders MJ, Verbeek AL.

J Med Screen. 2018 Mar;25(1):40-46. doi: 10.1177/0969141316687791. Epub 2017 Jan 13.

PMID:
28084888
8.

Pressure-standardised mammography does not affect visibility, contrast and sharpness of stable lesions.

de Groot JE, Hopman IGM, van Lier MGJTB, Branderhorst W, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten GJ.

Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan;86:289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.030. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

PMID:
28027762
9.

Can the non-pre-whitening model observer, including aspects of the human visual system, predict human observer performance in mammography?

Bouwman RW, van Engen RE, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ, Dance DR, Young KC, Veldkamp WJ.

Phys Med. 2016 Dec;32(12):1559-1569. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.109. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

PMID:
27889130
10.

Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment.

Holland K, van Zelst J, den Heeten GJ, Imhof-Tas M, Mann RM, van Gils CH, Karssemeijer N.

Breast. 2016 Oct;29:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

PMID:
27420382
11.

The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.

van Luijt PA, Heijnsdijk EA, Fracheboud J, Overbeek LI, Broeders MJ, Wesseling J, den Heeten GJ, de Koning HJ.

Breast Cancer Res. 2016 May 10;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0705-5.

12.

SIMULATING LOCAL DENSE AREAS USING PMMA TO ASSESS AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.

Bouwman RW, Binst J, Dance DR, Young KC, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ, Veldkamp WJ, Bosmans H, van Engen RE.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Jun;169(1-4):143-50. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw032. Epub 2016 Mar 13.

PMID:
26977073
13.

Force balancing in mammographic compression.

Branderhorst W, de Groot JE, Neeter LM, van Lier MG, Neeleman C, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA.

Med Phys. 2016 Jan;43(1):518. doi: 10.1118/1.4939129.

PMID:
26745945
14.

Towards personalized screening: Cumulative risk of breast cancer screening outcomes in women with and without a first-degree relative with a history of breast cancer.

Ripping TM, Hubbard RA, Otten JD, den Heeten GJ, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ.

Int J Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;138(7):1619-25. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29912. Epub 2015 Nov 20.

15.

[The correct mammographic positioning in breast cancer screening].

Landsveld-Verhoeven C, den Heeten GJ, Timmers JM, Broeders MJ.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A9488. Dutch.

PMID:
26507067
16.

Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data.

Bouwman RW, van Engen RE, Young KC, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJ, Schopphoven S, Jeukens CR, Veldkamp WJ, Dance DR.

Phys Med Biol. 2015 Oct 21;60(20):7893-907. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/20/7893. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

PMID:
26407015
17.

Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.

van der Waal D, den Heeten GJ, Pijnappel RM, Schuur KH, Timmers JM, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ.

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 3;10(9):e0136667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136667. eCollection 2015.

18.

Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands.

van der Waal D, Emaus MJ, Bakker MF, den Heeten GJ, Karssemeijer N, Pijnappel RM, Veldhuis WB, Verbeek AL, van Gils CH, Broeders MJ.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3328-37. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3742-z. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

19.

Arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls by a third reader at screening mammography lowers recall rate but not the cancer detection rate and sensitivity at blinded and non-blinded double reading.

Klompenhouwer EG, Weber RJ, Voogd AC, den Heeten GJ, Strobbe LJ, Broeders MJ, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Duijm LE.

Breast. 2015 Oct;24(5):601-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.06.004.

PMID:
26117723
20.

Mammographic positioning quality of newly trained versus experienced radiographers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme.

van Landsveld-Verhoeven C, den Heeten GJ, Timmers J, Broeders MJ.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3322-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3738-8. Epub 2015 May 19.

PMID:
25987428
21.

Value of audits in breast cancer screening quality assurance programmes.

Geertse TD, Holland R, Timmers JM, Paap E, Pijnappel RM, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3338-47. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3744-x. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

PMID:
25903711
22.

Discrepant screening mammography assessments at blinded and non-blinded double reading: impact of arbitration by a third reader on screening outcome.

Klompenhouwer EG, Voogd AC, den Heeten GJ, Strobbe LJ, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Broeders MJ, Duijm LE.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Oct;25(10):2821-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3711-6. Epub 2015 Apr 18.

PMID:
25894007
23.

Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.

de Groot JE, Broeders MJ, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten GJ.

BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0185-2. Epub 2015 Mar 15.

24.

Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization.

Branderhorst W, de Groot JE, Highnam R, Chan A, Böhm-Vélez M, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA.

Eur J Radiol. 2015 Apr;84(4):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.012. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

PMID:
25596915
25.

Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.

Klompenhouwer EG, Voogd AC, den Heeten GJ, Strobbe LJ, de Haan AF, Wauters CA, Broeders MJ, Duijm LE.

Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):391-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

PMID:
25573788
26.

The potential use of ultra-low radiation dose images in digital mammography--a clinical proof-of-concept study in craniocaudal views.

Bluekens AM, Veldkamp WJ, Schuur KH, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ.

Br J Radiol. 2015 Mar;88(1047):20140626. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140626. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

27.

Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure- and force-standardization.

de Groot JE, Branderhorst W, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJM.

Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar;84(3):384-391. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

28.

Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose and technical image quality.

Broeders MJ, Ten Voorde M, Veldkamp WJ, van Engen RE, van Landsveld-Verhoeven C, 't Jong-Gunneman MN, de Win J, Greve KD, Paap E, den Heeten GJ.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):821-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3422-4. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

29.

Cost-effectiveness of non-invasive assessment in the Dutch breast cancer screening program versus usual care: a randomized controlled trial.

Timmers JM, Damen JA, Pijnappel RM, Verbeek AL, den Heeten GJ, Adang EM, Broeders MJ.

Can J Public Health. 2014 Jul 31;105(5):e342-7.

PMID:
25365268
30.

Breast cancer diagnosis and death in the Netherlands: a changing burden.

van der Waal D, Verbeek AL, den Heeten GJ, Ripping TM, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Broeders MJ.

Eur J Public Health. 2015 Apr;25(2):320-4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku088. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

PMID:
24972595
31.

Re-attendance at biennial screening mammography following a repeated false positive recall.

Klompenhouwer EG, Duijm LE, Voogd AC, den Heeten GJ, Strobbe LJ, Louwman MW, Coebergh JW, Venderink D, Broeders MJ.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jun;145(2):429-37. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2959-x. Epub 2014 Apr 19.

PMID:
24748569
32.

Breast cancer screening halves the risk of breast cancer death: a case-referent study.

Paap E, Verbeek AL, Botterweck AA, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Imhof-Tas M, de Koning HJ, Otto SJ, de Munck L, van der Steen A, Holland R, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJ.

Breast. 2014 Aug;23(4):439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Apr 6.

PMID:
24713277
33.

Mammographic compression after breast conserving therapy: controlling pressure instead of force.

de Groot JE, Broeders MJ, Branderhorst W, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA.

Med Phys. 2014 Feb;41(2):023501. doi: 10.1118/1.4862512.

PMID:
24506652
34.

Variations in screening outcome among pairs of screening radiologists at non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study.

Klompenhouwer EG, Duijm LE, Voogd AC, den Heeten GJ, Nederend J, Jansen FH, Broeders MJ.

Eur Radiol. 2014 May;24(5):1097-104. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3102-4. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

PMID:
24500086
35.

Immediate and delayed effects of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality and incidence in birth cohorts.

Ripping TM, Verbeek AL, van der Waal D, Otten JD, den Heeten GJ, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Broeders MJ.

Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 29;109(9):2467-71. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.627. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

36.

Experiences with a self-test for Dutch breast screening radiologists: lessons learnt.

Timmers JM, Verbeek AL, Pijnappel RM, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ.

Eur Radiol. 2014 Feb;24(2):294-304. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3018-4. Epub 2013 Sep 22.

PMID:
24057201
37.

A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.

de Groot JE, Broeders MJ, Branderhorst W, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA.

Med Phys. 2013 Aug;40(8):081901. doi: 10.1118/1.4812418.

PMID:
23927315
38.

Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.

van Luijt PA, Fracheboud J, Heijnsdijk EA, den Heeten GJ, de Koning HJ; National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening in Netherlands Study Group (NETB).

Eur J Cancer. 2013 Nov;49(16):3517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

39.

Likelihood of early detection of breast cancer in relation to false-positive risk in life-time mammographic screening: population-based cohort study.

Otten JD, Fracheboud J, den Heeten GJ, Otto SJ, Holland R, de Koning HJ, Broeders MJ, Verbeek AL.

Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24(10):2501-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt227. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

PMID:
23788759
40.

Phantoms for quality control procedures in digital breast tomosynthesis: dose assessment.

Bouwman RW, Diaz O, van Engen RE, Young KC, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJ, Veldkamp WJ, Dance DR.

Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jul 7;58(13):4423-38. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/4423. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

PMID:
23756494
41.

Pressure and breast thickness in mammography--what about physics?

Grimbergen CA, den Heeten GJ.

Br J Radiol. 2013 Jul;86(1027):20130208. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130208. Epub 2013 May 20. No abstract available.

42.

Digital mammography in breast cancer screening: a step forward?

Bluekens AM, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ.

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013 May;13(5):505-7. doi: 10.1586/era.13.43. No abstract available.

PMID:
23617341
43.

Breast cancer risk prediction model: a nomogram based on common mammographic screening findings.

Timmers JM, Verbeek AL, IntHout J, Pijnappel RM, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2413-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2836-8. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

PMID:
23591619
44.

[Effects of the population screening into breast cancer].

Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ, Otto SJ, Frachebou J, Otten JD, Holland R, den Heeten GJ, de Koning HJ.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(10):A5218. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
23464582
45.

Is DCIS breast cancer, and how do I treat it?

Bijker N, Donker M, Wesseling J, den Heeten GJ, Rutgers EJ.

Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(1):75-87. doi: 10.1007/s11864-012-0217-1. Review.

PMID:
23239193
46.

Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts.

Hupse R, Samulski M, Lobbes MB, Mann RM, Mus R, den Heeten GJ, Beijerinck D, Pijnappel RM, Boetes C, Karssemeijer N.

Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):123-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120218. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

PMID:
23091171
47.

Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.

Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ.

Radiology. 2012 Dec;265(3):707-14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111461. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

PMID:
23033499
48.

Effect of compression paddle tilt correction on volumetric breast density estimation.

Kallenberg MG, van Gils CH, Lokate M, den Heeten GJ, Karssemeijer N.

Phys Med Biol. 2012 Aug 21;57(16):5155-68. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/16/5155. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

PMID:
22842727
49.

Improving mammographic screening test sensitivity.

van Schoor G, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJ, Verbeek AL.

J Med Screen. 2012 Jun;19(2):105-6. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.011151. No abstract available.

PMID:
22753875
50.

Incidental head and neck findings on MRI in young healthy volunteers: prevalence and clinical implications.

Reneman L, de Win MM, Booij J, van den Brink W, den Heeten GJ, Freling N, Majoie CB.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Nov;33(10):1971-4. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3217. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center