Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 32

1.

Deep Learning to Distinguish Recalled but Benign Mammography Images in Breast Cancer Screening.

Aboutalib SS, Mohamed AA, Berg WA, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Wu S.

Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 11. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1115. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30309858
2.

Relationships Between Human-Extracted MRI Tumor Phenotypes of Breast Cancer and Clinical Prognostic Indicators Including Receptor Status and Molecular Subtype.

Net JM, Whitman GJ, Morris E, Brandt KR, Burnside ES, Giger ML, Ganott M, Sutton EJ, Zuley ML, Rao A.

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Aug 23. pii: S0363-0188(18)30157-9. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.08.003. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30270031
3.

Linkage of the ACR National Mammography Database to the Network of State Cancer Registries: Proof of Concept Evaluation by the ACR National Mammography Database Committee.

Zuley ML, Nishikawa RM, Lee CS, Burnside E, Rosenberg R, Sickles EA, Berg W, Leung J, Harvey J, Sengupta D, Gur D.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Aug 9. pii: S1546-1440(18)30768-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.06.027. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30100161
4.

Grouped Amorphous Calcifications at Mammography: Frequently Atypical but Rarely Associated with Aggressive Malignancy.

Oligane HC, Berg WA, Bandos AI, Chen SS, Sohrabi S, Anello M, Zuley ML.

Radiology. 2018 Sep;288(3):671-679. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172406. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

PMID:
29916773
5.

DCE-MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement Quantified from an Early versus Delayed Post-contrast Sequence: Association with Breast Cancer Presence.

Wu S, Zuley ML, Berg WA, Kurland BF, Jankowitz RC, Sumkin JH, Gur D.

Sci Rep. 2017 May 18;7(1):2115. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02341-8.

6.

Lack of agreement between radiologists: implications for image-based model observers.

Lee J, Nishikawa RM, Reiser I, Zuley ML, Boone JM.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Apr;4(2):025502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.025502. Epub 2017 May 3.

7.

Association of Patient Age With Outcomes of Current-Era, Large-Scale Screening Mammography: Analysis of Data From the National Mammography Database.

Lee CS, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Sickles EA, Burnside ES, Zuley ML.

JAMA Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;3(8):1134-1136. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0482. No abstract available.

8.

Persistent Breast Pain Among Women With Histories of Breast-conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer Compared With Women Without Histories of Breast Surgery or Cancer.

Edmond SN, Shelby RA, Keefe FJ, Fisher HM, Schmidt JE, Soo MS, Skinner CS, Ahrendt GM, Manculich J, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Bovbjerg DH.

Clin J Pain. 2017 Jan;33(1):51-56.

9.

Breast MRI contrast enhancement kinetics of normal parenchyma correlate with presence of breast cancer.

Wu S, Berg WA, Zuley ML, Kurland BF, Jankowitz RC, Nishikawa R, Gur D, Sumkin JH.

Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Jul 22;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0734-0.

10.

Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.

Sumkin JH, Ganott MA, Chough DM, Catullo VJ, Zuley ML, Shinde DD, Hakim CM, Bandos AI, Gur D.

Acad Radiol. 2015 Dec;22(12):1477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

11.

Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes.

Sharek D, Zuley ML, Zhang JY, Soran A, Ahrendt GM, Ganott MA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):872-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12743.

PMID:
25794081
12.

Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy versus Fine Needle Aspiration for Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Ganott MA, Zuley ML, Abrams GS, Lu AH, Kelly AE, Sumkin JH, Chivukula M, Carter G, Austin RM, Bandos AI.

ISRN Oncol. 2014 Feb 4;2014:703160. doi: 10.1155/2014/703160. eCollection 2014.

13.

Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.

Zuley ML, Guo B, Catullo VJ, Chough DM, Kelly AE, Lu AH, Rathfon GY, Lee Spangler M, Sumkin JH, Wallace LP, Bandos AI.

Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):664-71. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131530. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

14.

Frequency of carcinoma at secondary imaging-guided percutaneous breast biopsy performed after a high-risk pathologic result at primary biopsy.

Majewski SA, Zuley ML, Pinnamaneni N, Ganott MA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Aug;201(2):439-47. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7693.

PMID:
23883227
15.

Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.

Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Kelly AE, Catullo VJ, Rathfon GY, Lu AH, Gur D.

Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):89-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120552. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

16.

Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment.

Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Wang X, Klym AH, Gur D.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 May 12.

17.

Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA.

Gallas BD, Chan HP, D'Orsi CJ, Dodd LE, Giger ML, Gur D, Krupinski EA, Metz CE, Myers KJ, Obuchowski NA, Sahiner B, Toledano AY, Zuley ML.

Acad Radiol. 2012 Apr;19(4):463-77. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

18.

Risk of malignancy when microscopic radial scars and microscopic papillomas are found at percutaneous biopsy.

Lee KA, Zuley ML, Chivukula M, Choksi ND, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Feb;198(2):W141-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7712.

PMID:
22268203
19.

Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study.

Gur D, Zuley ML, Anello MI, Rathfon GY, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Wallace L, Lu A, Bandos AI.

Acad Radiol. 2012 Feb;19(2):166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

20.

Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm.

Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Chough DM, Hakim CM.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar;196(3):737-41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4760.

PMID:
21343521
21.

Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment.

Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Lederman D, Wang X, Gur D.

Br J Radiol. 2012 Jun;85(1014):e153-61. doi: 10.1259/bjr/51461617. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

22.

Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.

Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Abrams G, Ganott MA, Hakim C, Perrin R, Chough DM, Shah R, Gur D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):320-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4656. Erratum in: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar;196(3):743.

PMID:
21257882
23.

A preliminary evaluation of multi-probe resonance-frequency electrical impedance based measurements of the breast.

Zheng B, Lederman D, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gruss MZ, Lovy LS, Gur D.

Acad Radiol. 2011 Feb;18(2):220-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.09.017. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

24.

The basics and implementation of digital mammography.

Zuley ML.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;48(5):893-901. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.003. Review.

PMID:
20868892
25.

Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review.

Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gur D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):W172-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3244. Review.

PMID:
20651178
26.

Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?

Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Zuley ML, Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH.

Acad Radiol. 2010 May;17(5):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.012. Epub 2010 Mar 16.

27.

Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations.

Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Abrams GS, Cohen C, Hakim CM, Sumkin JH, Drescher J, Rockette HE, Gur D.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Apr;17(4):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

PMID:
20036584
28.

Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.

Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Perrin RL, Rathfon GY, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Bandos AI.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):586-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2031.

PMID:
19620460
29.

Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: a preliminary study.

Zheng B, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Catullo VJ, Abrams GS, Rathfon GY, Chough DM, Gruss MZ, Gur D.

Med Phys. 2008 Jul;35(7):3041-8.

30.

Full-field digital mammography on LCD versus CRT monitors.

Zuley ML, Willison KM, Bonaccio E, Miller DP, Leong DL, Seifert PJ, Somerville P, Destounis S.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):1492-8.

PMID:
17114542
31.

Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.

Destounis SV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley ML, Willison KM.

Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):578-84. Epub 2004 Jun 30.

PMID:
15229350
32.

Observer sensitivity to small differences: a multipoint rank-order experiment.

Good WF, Sumkin JH, Dash N, Johns CM, Zuley ML, Rockette HE, Gur D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Aug;173(2):275-8.

PMID:
10430118

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center