Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 170

1.

Animal procrastination: Pigeons choose to defer experiencing an aversive gap or a peck requirement.

Zentall TR, Peng D, House D, Halloran M.

Learn Behav. 2019 Dec 16. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00397-2. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31845110
2.

Midsession reversal learning by pigeons: Effect on accuracy of increasing the number of stimuli associated with one of the alternatives.

Zentall TR, Peng DN, House DC, Yadav R.

Learn Behav. 2019 Dec;47(4):326-333. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00390-9.

PMID:
31420842
3.

Less information results in better midsession reversal accuracy by pigeons.

Zentall TR, Andrews DM, Case JP, Peng DN.

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Oct;45(4):422-430. doi: 10.1037/xan0000215. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

PMID:
31157526
4.

Transitive inference in pigeons may result from differential tendencies to reject the test stimuli acquired during training.

Zentall TR, Peng D, Miles L.

Anim Cogn. 2019 Sep;22(5):619-624. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01257-2. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

PMID:
30927140
5.

Differences in rats and pigeons suboptimal choice may depend on where those stimuli are in their behavior system.

Zentall TR, Smith AP, Beckmann J.

Behav Processes. 2019 Feb;159:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Dec 6. Review.

PMID:
30529687
6.

Contrast between what is expected and what occurs increases pigeon's suboptimal choice.

Zentall TR, Andrews DM, Case JP.

Anim Cogn. 2019 Jan;22(1):81-87. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1223-x. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

PMID:
30430348
7.

To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?

Andrews DM, Zentall TR.

Learn Behav. 2019 Sep;47(3):217-226. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0365-7.

PMID:
30421124
8.

Object permanence in the pigeon (Columba livia): Insertion of a delay prior to choice facilitates visible- and invisible-displacement accuracy.

Zentall TR, Raley OL.

J Comp Psychol. 2019 Feb;133(1):132-139. doi: 10.1037/com0000134. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

PMID:
30382709
9.

Rats can replay episodic memories of past odors.

Zentall TR.

Learn Behav. 2019 Mar;47(1):5-6. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0340-3.

PMID:
30105646
10.

Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Does the predictive value of the conditioned reinforcer alone determine choice?

Case JP, Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

PMID:
30077654
11.

Midsession reversal task with pigeons: Parallel processing of alternatives explains choices.

Smith AP, Zentall TR, Kacelnik A.

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(3):272-279. doi: 10.1037/xan0000180.

PMID:
29985044
12.

Sameness May Be a Natural Concept That Does Not Require Learning.

Zentall TR, Andrews DM, Case JP.

Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;29(7):1185-1189. doi: 10.1177/0956797618758669. Epub 2018 May 11.

PMID:
29750594
13.

The role of 'jackpot' stimuli in maladaptive decision-making: dissociable effects of D1/D2 receptor agonists and antagonists.

Smith AP, Hofford RS, Zentall TR, Beckmann JS.

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 May;235(5):1427-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4851-6. Epub 2018 Feb 18.

PMID:
29455291
14.

Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?

Zentall TR, Case JP, Andrews DM.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1952-1957. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1409-2.

PMID:
29188447
15.

Prior commitment: Its effect on suboptimal choice in a gambling-like task.

Zentall TR, Andrews DM, Case JP.

Behav Processes. 2017 Dec;145:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

PMID:
28939341
16.

Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: 'jackpot' signals promote maladaptive risky choice.

Smith AP, Beckmann JS, Zentall TR.

Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 26;7(1):6625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06641-x.

17.

Pigeons, unlike humans, do not prefer near hits in a slot-machine-like task.

Fortes I, Case JP, Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2017 May;138:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

PMID:
28216121
18.

Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.

Chow JJ, Smith AP, Wilson AG, Zentall TR, Beckmann JS.

Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;320:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

19.

Rats' acquisition of the ephemeral reward task.

Zentall TR, Case JP, Berry JR.

Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):419-425. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1065-3. Epub 2016 Dec 17.

PMID:
27988824
20.

Mechanisms of midsession reversal accuracy: Memory for preceding events and timing.

Smith AP, Beckmann JS, Zentall TR.

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jan;43(1):62-71. doi: 10.1037/xan0000124. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

PMID:
27786507
21.

Early commitment facilitates optimal choice by pigeons.

Zentall TR, Case JP, Berry JR.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):957-963. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1173-8.

PMID:
27743217
22.

I can time with a little help from my friends: effect of social enrichment on timing processes in Pigeons (Columba livia).

Laude JR, Daniels CW, Wade JC, Zentall TR.

Anim Cogn. 2016 Nov;19(6):1205-1213. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

PMID:
27632157
23.

Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.

Smith AP, Bailey AR, Chow JJ, Beckmann JS, Zentall TR.

PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159336. eCollection 2016.

24.

Pigeon's (Columba livia) paradoxical preference for the suboptimal alternative in a complex foraging task.

Zentall TR, Case JP, Luong J.

J Comp Psychol. 2016 May;130(2):138-44. doi: 10.1037/com0000026. Epub 2016 Apr 11.

PMID:
27064201
25.

Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.

Smith AP, Zentall TR.

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(2):212-20. doi: 10.1037/xan0000092. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

PMID:
26881902
26.

The relative value of two options for pigeons depends on their context.

Pinto C, Fortes I, Wilson AG, Zentall TR.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jan;105(1):176-83. doi: 10.1002/jeab.187.

PMID:
26781055
27.

Resolving the paradox of suboptimal choice.

Zentall TR.

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/xan0000085. Epub 2015 Dec 7. Review.

PMID:
26640967
28.

Reciprocal altruism in rats: Why does it occur?

Zentall TR.

Learn Behav. 2016 Mar;44(1):7-8. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0201-2.

PMID:
26486934
29.

Who are the real bird brains? Qualitative differences in behavioral flexibility between dogs (Canis familiaris) and pigeons (Columba livia).

Laude JR, Pattison KF, Rayburn-Reeves RM, Michler DM, Zentall TR.

Anim Cogn. 2016 Jan;19(1):163-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0923-8. Epub 2015 Sep 12.

PMID:
26364290
30.

Rats' midsession reversal performance: the nature of the response.

Smith AP, Pattison KF, Zentall TR.

Learn Behav. 2016 Mar;44(1):49-58. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0189-7.

PMID:
26202589
31.

Do pigeons prefer alternatives that include near-hit outcomes?

Stagner JP, Case JP, Sticklen MF, Duncan AK, Zentall TR.

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(3):247-54. doi: 10.1037/xan0000069.

PMID:
26167775
32.

Delayed matching-to-sample: A tool to assess memory and other cognitive processes in pigeons.

Zentall TR, Smith AP.

Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:26-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

PMID:
26165174
33.

The Monty Hall dilemma with pigeons: No, you choose for me.

Zentall TR, Case JP, Collins TL.

Learn Behav. 2015 Sep;43(3):209-16. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0172-3.

PMID:
25772336
34.

Further investigation of the Monty Hall Dilemma in pigeons and rats.

Stagner JP, Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2015 Mar;112:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

PMID:
25452075
35.

Self-regulatory depletion in dogs: insulin release is not necessary for the replenishment of persistence.

Miller HC, Pattison KF, Laude JR, Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2015 Jan;110:22-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.030. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

PMID:
25264236
36.

When animals misbehave: analogs of human biases and suboptimal choice.

Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2015 Mar;112:3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

PMID:
25192737
37.

Suboptimal choice by pigeons may result from the diminishing effect of nonreinforcement.

Laude JR, Stagner JP, Zentall TR.

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):12-21. doi: 10.1037/xan0000010.

38.

Risk should be objectively defined: comment on Pelé and Sueur.

Zentall TR, Smith AP.

Anim Cogn. 2014 Nov;17(6):1433-6. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0757-9. Epub 2014 Jun 1.

PMID:
24880641
39.

The evolution of self-control.

MacLean EL, Hare B, Nunn CL, Addessi E, Amici F, Anderson RC, Aureli F, Baker JM, Bania AE, Barnard AM, Boogert NJ, Brannon EM, Bray EE, Bray J, Brent LJ, Burkart JM, Call J, Cantlon JF, Cheke LG, Clayton NS, Delgado MM, DiVincenti LJ, Fujita K, Herrmann E, Hiramatsu C, Jacobs LF, Jordan KE, Laude JR, Leimgruber KL, Messer EJ, Moura AC, Ostojić L, Picard A, Platt ML, Plotnik JM, Range F, Reader SM, Reddy RB, Sandel AA, Santos LR, Schumann K, Seed AM, Sewall KB, Shaw RC, Slocombe KE, Su Y, Takimoto A, Tan J, Tao R, van Schaik CP, Virányi Z, Visalberghi E, Wade JC, Watanabe A, Widness J, Young JK, Zentall TR, Zhao Y.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):E2140-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323533111. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

40.

Reprint of "Suboptimal choice by pigeons: an analog of human gambling behavior".

Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2014 May;104:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 30.

PMID:
24690388
41.

Less means more for pigeons but not always.

Zentall TR, Laude JR, Case JP, Daniels CW.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1623-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0626-1.

PMID:
24687735
42.

Suboptimal choice by dogs: when less is better than more.

Pattison KF, Zentall TR.

Anim Cogn. 2014 Jul;17(4):1019-22. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0735-2. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

PMID:
24638874
43.

Transitive inference by pigeons: does the geometric presentation of the stimuli make a difference?

Daniels CW, Laude JR, Zentall TR.

Anim Cogn. 2014 Jul;17(4):973-81. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0729-0. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

PMID:
24481675
44.

ASSOCIATIVE CONCEPT LEARNING IN ANIMALS: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES.

Urcuioli PJ, Wasserman EA, Zentall TR.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):165-170. doi: 10.1002/jeab.62. Epub 2013 Dec 13. No abstract available.

45.

Six-term transitive inference with pigeons: successive-pair training followed by mixed-pair training.

Daniels CW, Laude JR, Zentall TR.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):26-37. doi: 10.1002/jeab.65. Epub 2013 Dec 7.

46.

Suboptimal choice by pigeons: an analog of human gambling behavior.

Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 27. Review.

47.

Associative concept learning in animals.

Zentall TR, Wasserman EA, Urcuioli PJ.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):130-51. doi: 10.1002/jeab.55. Epub 2013 Oct 29. Review.

48.

Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.

Laude JR, Stagner JP, Rayburn-Reeves R, Zentall TR.

Learn Behav. 2014 Mar;42(1):40-6. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0122-x.

49.

Animals represent the past and the future.

Zentall TR.

Evol Psychol. 2013;11(3):573-90.

PMID:
24027784
50.

Impulsivity affects suboptimal gambling-like choice by pigeons.

Laude JR, Beckmann JS, Daniels CW, Zentall TR.

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):2-11. doi: 10.1037/xan0000001.

PMID:
23815385

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center