Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 4

1.

Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Polly DW, Swofford J, Whang PG, Frank CJ, Glaser JA, Limoni RP, Cher DJ, Wine KD, Sembrano JN; INSITE Study Group.

Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Aug 23;10:28. doi: 10.14444/3028. eCollection 2016.

2.

Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study.

Duhon BS, Cher DJ, Wine KD, Kovalsky DA, Lockstadt H; SIFI Study Group.

Global Spine J. 2016 May;6(3):257-69. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562912. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

3.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.

Polly DW, Cher DJ, Wine KD, Whang PG, Frank CJ, Harvey CF, Lockstadt H, Glaser JA, Limoni RP, Sembrano JN; INSITE Study Group.

Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988.

4.

Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.

Duhon BS, Cher DJ, Wine KD, Lockstadt H, Kovalsky D, Soo CL.

Med Devices (Auckl). 2013 Dec 13;6:219-29. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S55197. eCollection 2013.

Supplemental Content

Support Center