Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 23

1.

Do target detection and target localization always go together? Extracting information from briefly presented displays.

Carrigan AJ, Wardle SG, Rich AN.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jun 19. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01782-9. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31218599
2.

Amygdala lesions eliminate viewing preferences for faces in rhesus monkeys.

Taubert J, Flessert M, Wardle SG, Basile BM, Murphy AP, Murray EA, Ungerleider LG.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 31;115(31):8043-8048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807245115. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

3.

Finding cancer in mammograms: if you know it's there, do you know where?

Carrigan AJ, Wardle SG, Rich AN.

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018;3(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0096-5. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

4.

Asymmetric Compression of Representational Space for Object Animacy Categorization under Degraded Viewing Conditions.

Grootswagers T, Ritchie JB, Wardle SG, Heathcote A, Carlson TA.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Dec;29(12):1995-2010. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01177. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

PMID:
28820673
5.

Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey.

Taubert J, Wardle SG, Flessert M, Leopold DA, Ungerleider LG.

Curr Biol. 2017 Aug 21;27(16):2505-2509.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.075. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

6.

Decoding the time-course of object recognition in the human brain: From visual features to categorical decisions.

Contini EW, Wardle SG, Carlson TA.

Neuropsychologia. 2017 Oct;105:165-176. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Feb 17. Review.

PMID:
28215698
7.

Edge-Related Activity Is Not Necessary to Explain Orientation Decoding in Human Visual Cortex.

Wardle SG, Ritchie JB, Seymour K, Carlson TA.

J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;37(5):1187-1196. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2690-16.2016. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

8.

Decoding Dynamic Brain Patterns from Evoked Responses: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis Applied to Time Series Neuroimaging Data.

Grootswagers T, Wardle SG, Carlson TA.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Apr;29(4):677-697. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01068. Epub 2016 Oct 25. Review.

PMID:
27779910
9.

Gradients of relative disparity underlie the perceived slant of stereoscopic surfaces.

Wardle SG, Gillam BJ.

J Vis. 2016;16(5):16. doi: 10.1167/16.5.16.

PMID:
26998800
10.

Perceptual similarity of visual patterns predicts dynamic neural activation patterns measured with MEG.

Wardle SG, Kriegeskorte N, Grootswagers T, Khaligh-Razavi SM, Carlson TA.

Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

PMID:
26899210
11.

Zen Mountains: An Illusion of Perceptual Transparency.

Wardle SG, Carlson TA.

Iperception. 2015 Apr;6(2):108-110. doi: 10.1068/i0723sas. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

12.

Sensible decoding.

Carlson TA, Wardle SG.

Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 15;110:217-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

PMID:
25680521
13.

Can object category-selectivity in the ventral visual pathway be explained by sensitivity to low-level image properties?

Wardle SG, Ritchie JB.

J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 5;34(45):14817-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3566-14.2014. No abstract available.

14.

Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.

Wardle SG, Palmisano S, Gillam BJ.

Vision Res. 2014 Jul;100:113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 5.

15.

Orientation contrast and entropy contrast in the genesis of subjective contours along thin lines.

Gillam BJ, Wardle SG, Vecellio E.

Perception. 2014;43(1):7-22.

PMID:
24689128
16.

A mid-level explanation for the venetian blind effect.

Gillam BJ, Wardle SG.

Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 3;4:908. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00908. eCollection 2013. No abstract available.

17.

Color constrains depth in da Vinci stereopsis for camouflage but not occlusion.

Wardle SG, Gillam BJ.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Dec;39(6):1525-40. doi: 10.1037/a0032315. Epub 2013 Apr 8.

PMID:
23565743
18.

Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.

Wardle SG, Gillam BJ.

J Vis. 2013 Feb 8;13(2):16. doi: 10.1167/13.2.16.

PMID:
23397041
19.

Evidence for speed sensitivity to motion in depth from binocular cues.

Wardle SG, Alais D.

J Vis. 2013 Jan 10;13(1). pii: 17. doi: 10.1167/13.1.17.

PMID:
23308025
20.

Stereoacuity in the periphery is limited by internal noise.

Wardle SG, Bex PJ, Cass J, Alais D.

J Vis. 2012 Jun 8;12(6):12. doi: 10.1167/12.6.12.

21.

Breaking camouflage: binocular disparity reduces contrast masking in natural images.

Wardle SG, Cass J, Brooks KR, Alais D.

J Vis. 2010 Dec 31;10(14). pii: 38. doi: 10.1167/10.14.38.

PMID:
21196512
22.

Do reaction times in the Perruchet effect reflect variations in the strength of an associative link?

Mitchell CJ, Wardle SG, Lovibond PF, Weidemann G, Chang BP.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):567-72. doi: 10.1037/a0018433.

PMID:
20192552
23.

Flavor evaluative conditioning and contingency awareness.

Wardle SG, Mitchell CJ, Lovibond PF.

Learn Behav. 2007 Nov;35(4):233-41.

PMID:
18047221

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center