Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 93

1.

Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP.

Foster C, Wager E, Marchington J, Patel M, Banner S, Kennard NC, Panayi A, Stacey R; GPCAP Working Group.

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Jun 5;4:11. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0070-x. eCollection 2019.

2.

A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions.

Sharp MK, Tokalić R, Gómez G, Wager E, Altman DG, Hren D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;107:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

3.

Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals.

Rohwer A, Wager E, Young T, Garner P.

BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):e024777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024777.

4.

Research Integrity and Peer Review-past highlights and future directions.

Boughton SL, Kowalczuk MK, Meerpohl JJ, Wager E, Moylan EC.

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Mar 6;3:3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0047-1. eCollection 2018.

5.

Response to letter to the editor by Mc Sween-Cadieux et al. (2017).

Buljan I, Malički M, Wager E, Puljak L, Hren D, Kellie F, West H, Alfirević Ž, Marušić A.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;100:133-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Mar 5. No abstract available.

PMID:
29518477
6.

No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials.

Buljan I, Malički M, Wager E, Puljak L, Hren D, Kellie F, West H, Alfirević Ž, Marušić A.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

7.

Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers.

Rohwer A, Young T, Wager E, Garner P.

BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 22;7(11):e018467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018467.

8.

The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement.

Sharp MK, Utrobičić A, Gómez G, Cobo E, Wager E, Hren D.

BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e019043. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019043.

9.

Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement.

Moher D, Galipeau J, Alam S, Barbour V, Bartolomeos K, Baskin P, Bell-Syer S, Cobey KD, Chan L, Clark J, Deeks J, Flanagin A, Garner P, Glenny AM, Groves T, Gurusamy K, Habibzadeh F, Jewell-Thomas S, Kelsall D, Lapeña JF Jr, MacLehose H, Marusic A, McKenzie JE, Shah J, Shamseer L, Straus S, Tugwell P, Wager E, Winker M, Zhaori G.

BMC Med. 2017 Sep 11;15(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0927-0.

10.

Why we should worry less about predatory publishers and more about the quality of research and training at our academic institutions.

Wager E.

J Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):87-88. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 8. No abstract available.

11.

Opinions and potential solutions regarding dissemination bias from funding agencies of biomedical research in Europe.

Pardo-Hernandez H, Urrútia G, Meerpohl JJ, Marušić A, Wager E, Bonfill X; OPEN Project Consortium.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):72-79. doi: 10.1111/jep.12692. Epub 2017 Jan 16.

PMID:
28090730
12.

Do declarative titles affect readers' perceptions of research findings? A randomized trial.

Wager E, Altman DG, Simera I, Toma TP.

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Aug 4;1:11. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0018-3. eCollection 2016.

13.

A new forum for research on research integrity and peer review.

Harriman SL, Kowalczuk MK, Simera I, Wager E.

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 May 3;1:5. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0010-y. eCollection 2016.

14.

Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.

Marusic A, Wager E, Utrobicic A, Rothstein HR, Sambunjak D.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4:MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2. Review.

PMID:
27040721
15.

Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study.

Gattrell WT, Hopewell S, Young K, Farrow P, White R, Wager E, Winchester CC.

BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 21;6(2):e010329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010329.

16.

A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.

Galipeau J, Barbour V, Baskin P, Bell-Syer S, Cobey K, Cumpston M, Deeks J, Garner P, MacLehose H, Shamseer L, Straus S, Tugwell P, Wager E, Winker M, Moher D.

BMC Med. 2016 Feb 2;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0561-2. Review.

17.

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus.

Bassler D, Mueller KF, Briel M, Kleijnen J, Marusic A, Wager E, Antes G, von Elm E, Altman DG, Meerpohl JJ; OPEN Consortium.

BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 21;6(1):e010024. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010024. Review.

18.

Too much of a good thing? An observational study of prolific authors.

Wager E, Singhvi S, Kleinert S.

PeerJ. 2015 Aug 18;3:e1154. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1154. eCollection 2015.

19.

Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3.

Battisti WP, Wager E, Baltzer L, Bridges D, Cairns A, Carswell CI, Citrome L, Gurr JA, Mooney LA, Moore BJ, Peña T, Sanes-Miller CH, Veitch K, Woolley KL, Yarker YE; International Society for Medical Publication Professionals.

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):461-4. doi: 10.7326/M15-0288.

PMID:
26259067
20.

Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.

Resnik DB, Wager E, Kissling GE.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):136-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.006.

21.

Promoting Global Health: The World Association of Medical Editors Position on Editors' Responsibility.

Winker MA, Ferris LE; World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) Ethics and Policy Committee; WAME Board, Aggarwal R, Barbour V, Callaham M, Cress PE, Habibzadeh F, Jawad F, Kumar R, Laine C, Lang T, McGee G, Momen H, Rohrich RJ, Ruiz Mdel C, Sahni P, Wager E.

Int J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Jul;6(3):125-7. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2015.638. No abstract available.

22.

Are prolific authors too much of a good thing?

Wager E.

BMJ. 2015 Jul 1;351:h2782. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2782. No abstract available. Erratum in: BMJ. 2015;351:h4667.

PMID:
26136367
23.

Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting.

Meerpohl JJ, Schell LK, Bassler D, Gallus S, Kleijnen J, Kulig M, La Vecchia C, Marušić A, Ravaud P, Reis A, Schmucker C, Strech D, Urrútia G, Wager E, Antes G; OPEN project consortium.

BMJ Open. 2015 May 5;5(5):e006666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006666.

24.

How should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct?

Wager E.

Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):95-101.

PMID:
25711228
25.

Responsible research publication: international standards for editors.

Kleinert S, Wager E.

Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):35-41.

PMID:
25711220
26.

Responsible research publication: international standards for authors.

Wager E, Kleinert S.

Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):29-33.

PMID:
25711219
27.

Publication ethics: whose problem is it?

Wager E.

Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):23-7.

PMID:
25711218
28.

How should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct?

Wager E.

J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):146-50. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.829. eCollection 2014 Dec.

29.

Why should clinical trials be registered?

Wager E, Elia N.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Aug;31(8):397-400. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000084. No abstract available.

PMID:
24992600
30.

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey.

Wager E, Woolley K, Adshead V, Cairns A, Fullam J, Gonzalez J, Grant T, Tortell S.

BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 19;4(4):e004780. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004780.

31.

Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Elia N, Wager E, Tramèr MR.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085846. eCollection 2014.

32.

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.

Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, Michie S, Moher D, Wager E.

Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

PMID:
24411647
33.

Why do we need international standards on responsible research publication for authors and editors?

Wager E, Kleinert S.

J Glob Health. 2013 Dec;3(2):020301. doi: 10.7189/jogh.03.020301. Review. No abstract available.

34.

"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study.

Wager E, Williams P; Project Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings Consortium.

BMJ. 2013 Sep 6;347:f5248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5248.

35.

Commentary: Publication ethics and cochrane reviews.

Wager E.

Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):677-80. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt085. Epub 2013 Jun 11. No abstract available.

PMID:
23760498
36.

Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework.

Müller KF, Briel M, D'Amario A, Kleijnen J, Marusic A, Wager E, Antes G, von Elm E, Lang B, Motschall E, Gloy V, Schwarzer G, Altman D, Meerpohl JJ, Bassler D.

Syst Rev. 2013 May 21;2:34. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-34.

37.

The UK should lead the way on research integrity.

Wager E.

BMJ. 2013 Apr 22;346:f2348. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2348. No abstract available.

PMID:
23610377
38.
39.

Why has COPE developed guidelines for cooperation between journals and research institutions?

Wager E.

Med Arch. 2012;66(4):220-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
22919873
40.
41.

Why has the committee on publication ethics developed guidelines for cooperation between journals and research institutions?

Wager E.

Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Apr;6(2):102-3. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.97018. No abstract available.

42.

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): Objectives and achievements 1997-2012.

Wager E.

Presse Med. 2012 Sep;41(9 Pt 1):861-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.02.049. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

PMID:
22727914
43.

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Wager E, Kleinert S; Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Maturitas. 2012 Jun;72(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

PMID:
22541357
44.

Editorial code of conduct.

Wager E.

Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):e31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60190-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
22305229
45.

Research misconduct in the UK.

Godlee F, Wager E.

BMJ. 2012 Jan 4;344:d8357. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8357. No abstract available.

PMID:
22218103
46.

Why Has COPE Developed Guidelines for Cooperation Between Journals and Research Institutions?

Wager E.

Mater Sociomed. 2012;24(3):140-1. doi: 10.5455/msm.2012.24.140-141. No abstract available.

47.

Coping with scientific misconduct.

Wager E.

BMJ. 2011 Oct 20;343:d6586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6586. No abstract available.

PMID:
22016451
48.

Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: findings from a qualitative study.

Williams P, Wager E.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

PMID:
21761244
49.

Ethical issues in preparing and publishing systematic reviews.

Wager E, Wiffen PJ.

J Evid Based Med. 2011 May;4(2):130-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2011.01122.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
23672703
50.

Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.

Wager E, Williams P.

J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):567-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040964. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

PMID:
21486985

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center