Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 31

1.

Cross-cultural consistency and relativity in the enjoyment of thinking versus doing.

Buttrick N, Choi H, Wilson TD, Oishi S, Boker SM, Gilbert DT, Alper S, Aveyard M, Cheong W, Čolić MV, Dalgar I, Doğulu C, Karabati S, Kim E, Knežević G, Komiya A, Laclé CO, Ambrosio Lage C, Lazarević LB, Lazarević D, Lins S, Blanco Molina M, Neto F, Orlić A, Petrović B, Arroyo Sibaja M, Torres Fernández D, Vanpaemel W, Voorspoels W, Wilks DC.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jul 23. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000198. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30035566
2.

Biased pain reports through vicarious information: A computational approach to investigate the role of uncertainty.

Zaman J, Vanpaemel W, Aelbrecht C, Tuerlinckx F, Vlaeyen JWS.

Cognition. 2017 Dec;169:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

PMID:
28825990
3.

Sensitivity to the prototype in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: An example of Bayesian cognitive psychometrics.

Voorspoels W, Rutten I, Bartlema A, Tuerlinckx F, Vanpaemel W.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):271-285. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1245-4.

PMID:
28290128
4.

Determining informative priors for cognitive models.

Lee MD, Vanpaemel W.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):114-127. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1238-3.

PMID:
28194721
5.

Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis.

Steegen S, Tuerlinckx F, Gelman A, Vanpaemel W.

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;11(5):702-712.

PMID:
27694465
6.

Using parameter space partitioning to evaluate a model's qualitative fit.

Steegen S, Tuerlinckx F, Vanpaemel W.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):617-631. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1123-5.

PMID:
27562764
7.

Analyzing subcomponents of affective dysregulation in borderline personality disorder in comparison to other clinical groups using multiple e-diary datasets.

Santangelo PS, Limberger MF, Stiglmayr C, Houben M, Coosemans J, Verleysen G, Kuppens P, Tuerlinckx F, Vanpaemel W, Ebner-Priemer UW.

Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2016 Jul 6;3:5. doi: 10.1186/s40479-016-0039-z. eCollection 2016.

8.

Understanding individual differences in representational abstraction: The role of working memory capacity.

Stukken L, Van Rensbergen B, Vanpaemel W, Storms G.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Oct;170:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 3.

PMID:
27385470
9.

Assessing Temporal Emotion Dynamics Using Networks.

Bringmann LF, Pe ML, Vissers N, Ceulemans E, Borsboom D, Vanpaemel W, Tuerlinckx F, Kuppens P.

Assessment. 2016 Aug;23(4):425-435. doi: 10.1177/1073191116645909.

PMID:
27141038
10.

Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science".

Anderson CJ, Bahník Š, Barnett-Cowan M, Bosco FA, Chandler J, Chartier CR, Cheung F, Christopherson CD, Cordes A, Cremata EJ, Della Penna N, Estel V, Fedor A, Fitneva SA, Frank MC, Grange JA, Hartshorne JK, Hasselman F, Henninger F, van der Hulst M, Jonas KJ, Lai CK, Levitan CA, Miller JK, Moore KS, Meixner JM, Munafò MR, Neijenhuijs KI, Nilsonne G, Nosek BA, Plessow F, Prenoveau JM, Ricker AA, Schmidt K, Spies JR, Stieger S, Strohminger N, Sullivan GB, van Aert RC, van Assen MA, Vanpaemel W, Vianello M, Voracek M, Zuni K.

Science. 2016 Mar 4;351(6277):1037. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9163.

11.

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review.

Morey RD, Chambers CD, Etchells PJ, Harris CR, Hoekstra R, Lakens D, Lewandowsky S, Morey CC, Newman DP, Schönbrodt FD, Vanpaemel W, Wagenmakers EJ, Zwaan RA.

R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 13;3(1):150547. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150547. eCollection 2016 Jan. Review.

12.

Caveats for the spatial arrangement method: Comment on Hout, Goldinger, and Ferguson (2013).

Verheyen S, Voorspoels W, Vanpaemel W, Storms G.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Mar;145(3):376-82. doi: 10.1037/a0039758.

PMID:
26881991
13.

Corrigendum: Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study.

Steegen S, Dewitte L, Tuerlinckx F, Vanpaemel W.

Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 12;6:238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00238. eCollection 2015.

14.

Can race really be erased? A pre-registered replication study.

Voorspoels W, Bartlema A, Vanpaemel W.

Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 16;5:1035. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01035. eCollection 2014.

15.

Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study.

Steegen S, Dewitte L, Tuerlinckx F, Vanpaemel W.

Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 28;5:786. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00786. eCollection 2014. Erratum in: Front Psychol. 2015;6:238.

16.

Revealing human inductive biases for category learning by simulating cultural transmission.

Canini KR, Griffiths TL, Vanpaemel W, Kalish ML.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):785-93. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0556-3.

PMID:
24395094
17.

Quantum models of cognition as Orwellian newspeak.

Lee MD, Vanpaemel W.

Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):295-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12003020.

PMID:
23673041
18.

The Bayesian evaluation of categorization models: comment on Wills and Pothos (2012).

Vanpaemel W, Lee MD.

Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;138(6):1253-8; discussion 1259-61. doi: 10.1037/a0028551.

PMID:
23088573
19.

Idealness and similarity in goal-derived categories: a computational examination.

Voorspoels W, Storms G, Vanpaemel W.

Mem Cognit. 2013 Feb;41(2):312-27. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0252-y.

PMID:
22972665
20.

Using priors to formalize theory: optimal attention and the generalized context model.

Vanpaemel W, Lee MD.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1047-56. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0300-4. Review.

PMID:
22869335
21.

Contrast effects in typicality judgements: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.

Voorspoels W, Storms G, Vanpaemel W.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(9):1721-39. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.662237. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

PMID:
22537154
22.

A formal ideal-based account of typicality.

Voorspoels W, Vanpaemel W, Storms G.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):1006-14. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0122-9.

PMID:
21713370
23.

Representation at different levels in a conceptual hierarchy.

Voorspoels W, Storms G, Vanpaemel W.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 28.

PMID:
21621177
24.

Geometric and featural representations in semantic concepts.

Vanpaemel W, Verbeemen T, Dry M, Verguts T, Storms G.

Mem Cognit. 2010 Oct;38(7):962-8. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.7.962.

PMID:
20921108
25.

Abstraction and model evaluation in category learning.

Vanpaemel W, Storms G.

Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):421-37. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.421.

PMID:
20479173
26.

BayesGCM: software for Bayesian inference with the generalized context model.

Vanpaemel W.

Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1111-20. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1111.

PMID:
19897818
27.

Exemplars, prototypes, similarities, and rules in category representation: an example of hierarchical bayesian analysis.

Lee MD, Vanpaemel W.

Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;32(8):1403-24. doi: 10.1080/03640210802073697.

28.

Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts.

De Deyne S, Verheyen S, Ameel E, Vanpaemel W, Dry MJ, Voorspoels W, Storms G.

Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):1030-48. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1030.

PMID:
19001394
29.

In search of abstraction: the varying abstraction model of categorization.

Vanpaemel W, Storms G.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):732-49.

PMID:
18792499
30.

Exemplars and prototypes in natural language concepts: a typicality-based evaluation.

Voorspoels W, Vanpaemel W, Storms G.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):630-7.

PMID:
18567266
31.

Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars.

Ruts W, De Deyne S, Ameel E, Vanpaemel W, Verbeemen T, Storms G.

Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):506-15.

PMID:
15641439

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center