Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 110

1.

The relative contributions of visual and semantic information in the neural representation of object categories.

Victoria LW, Pyles JA, Tarr MJ.

Brain Behav. 2019 Oct;9(10):e01373. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1373. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

2.

Exploring spatiotemporal neural dynamics of the human visual cortex.

Yang Y, Tarr MJ, Kass RE, Aminoff EM.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Oct 1;40(14):4213-4238. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24697. Epub 2019 Jun 23.

PMID:
31231899
3.

BOLD5000, a public fMRI dataset while viewing 5000 visual images.

Chang N, Pyles JA, Marcus A, Gupta A, Tarr MJ, Aminoff EM.

Sci Data. 2019 May 6;6(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0052-3.

4.

Very high density EEG elucidates spatiotemporal aspects of early visual processing.

Robinson AK, Venkatesh P, Boring MJ, Tarr MJ, Grover P, Behrmann M.

Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 24;7(1):16248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16377-3.

5.

Exploring the spatio-temporal neural basis of face learning.

Yang Y, Xu Y, Jew CA, Pyles JA, Kass RE, Tarr MJ.

J Vis. 2017 Jun 1;17(6):1. doi: 10.1167/17.6.1.

6.

Visual Object Recognition: Do We (Finally) Know More Now Than We Did?

Gauthier I, Tarr MJ.

Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 14;2:377-396. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114621. Epub 2016 Aug 3. Review.

PMID:
28532357
7.

Awake, Offline Processing during Associative Learning.

Bursley JK, Nestor A, Tarr MJ, Creswell JD.

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 27;11(4):e0127522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127522. eCollection 2016.

8.

A method for real-time visual stimulus selection in the study of cortical object perception.

Leeds DD, Tarr MJ.

Neuroimage. 2016 Jun;133:529-548. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.071. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

9.

Estimating Learning Effects: A Short-Time Fourier Transform Regression Model for MEG Source Localization.

Yang Y, Tarr MJ, Kass RE.

Mach Learn Interpret Neuroimaging (2014). 2016;9444:69-82. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45174-9_8. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

10.

Associative Processing Is Inherent in Scene Perception.

Aminoff EM, Tarr MJ.

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0128840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128840. eCollection 2015.

11.

Applying artificial vision models to human scene understanding.

Aminoff EM, Toneva M, Shrivastava A, Chen X, Misra I, Gupta A, Tarr MJ.

Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Feb 4;9:8. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00008. eCollection 2015.

12.

Exploration of complex visual feature spaces for object perception.

Leeds DD, Pyles JA, Tarr MJ.

Front Comput Neurosci. 2014 Sep 12;8:106. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2014.00106. eCollection 2014.

13.

Size precedes view: developmental emergence of invariant object representations in lateral occipital complex.

Nishimura M, Scherf KS, Zachariou V, Tarr MJ, Behrmann M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Mar;27(3):474-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00720. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

PMID:
25244115
14.

Comparing visual representations across human fMRI and computational vision.

Leeds DD, Seibert DA, Pyles JA, Tarr MJ.

J Vis. 2013 Nov 22;13(13):25. doi: 10.1167/13.13.25.

15.

Fine-grained temporal coding of visually-similar categories in the ventral visual pathway and prefrontal cortex.

Xu Y, D'Lauro C, Pyles JA, Kass RE, Tarr MJ.

Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 17;4:684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00684. eCollection 2013.

16.

Can singular examples change implicit attitudes in the real-world?

Roos LE, Lebrecht S, Tanaka JW, Tarr MJ.

Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 5;4:594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00594. eCollection 2013.

17.

Explicating the face perception network with white matter connectivity.

Pyles JA, Verstynen TD, Schneider W, Tarr MJ.

PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061611. Print 2013.

18.

Perception isn't so simple: commentary on Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, and Klein (2012).

Tarr MJ.

Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):1069-70. doi: 10.1177/0956797612474669. Epub 2013 Apr 18. No abstract available.

19.

Co-analysis of brain structure and function using fMRI and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Phillips JS, Greenberg AS, Pyles JA, Pathak SK, Behrmann M, Schneider W, Tarr MJ.

J Vis Exp. 2012 Nov 8;(69). pii: 4125. doi: 10.3791/4125.

20.

Internal representations for face detection: an application of noise-based image classification to BOLD responses.

Nestor A, Vettel JM, Tarr MJ.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Nov;34(11):3101-15. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22128. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

21.

Micro-valences: perceiving affective valence in everyday objects.

Lebrecht S, Bar M, Barrett LF, Tarr MJ.

Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 17;3:107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00107. eCollection 2012.

22.

Does acquisition of Greeble expertise in prosopagnosia rule out a domain-general deficit?

Bukach CM, Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Kadlec H, Barth S, Ryan E, Turpin J, Bub DN.

Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jan;50(2):289-304. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.023. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

PMID:
22172545
23.

Face categorization in visual scenes may start in a higher order area of the right fusiform gyrus: evidence from dynamic visual stimulation in neuroimaging.

Jiang F, Dricot L, Weber J, Righi G, Tarr MJ, Goebel R, Rossion B.

J Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;106(5):2720-36. doi: 10.1152/jn.00672.2010. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

24.
25.

Race-specific perceptual discrimination improvement following short individuation training with faces.

McGugin RW, Tanaka JW, Lebrecht S, Tarr MJ, Gauthier I.

Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;35(2):330-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01148.x. Epub 2010 Nov 8.

26.

Figure-ground assignment to a translating contour: a preference for advancing vs. receding motion.

Barenholtz E, Tarr MJ.

J Vis. 2009 May 28;9(5):27.1-9. doi: 10.1167/9.5.27.

27.

Perceptual other-race training reduces implicit racial bias.

Lebrecht S, Pierce LJ, Tarr MJ, Tanaka JW.

PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004215. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

28.

The segmental structure of faces and its use in gender recognition.

Nestor A, Tarr MJ.

J Vis. 2008 May 23;8(7):7.1-12. doi: 10.1167/8.7.7.

29.

Gender recognition of human faces using color.

Nestor A, Tarr MJ.

Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1242-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02232.x.

PMID:
19121131
30.

Task-specific codes for face recognition: how they shape the neural representation of features for detection and individuation.

Nestor A, Vettel JM, Tarr MJ.

PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003978. Epub 2008 Dec 29.

31.

Visual judgment of similarity across shape transformations: evidence for a compositional model of articulated objects.

Barenholtz E, Tarr MJ.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jun;128(2):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 May 7.

PMID:
18466857
32.

Is region-of-interest overlap comparison a reliable measure of category specificity?

Kung CC, Peissig JJ, Tarr MJ.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):2019-34.

PMID:
17892386
33.

Humans do not switch between path knowledge and landmarks when learning a new environment.

Foo P, Duchon A, Warren WH Jr, Tarr MJ.

Psychol Res. 2007 May;71(3):240-51. Epub 2006 Sep 7.

PMID:
16957956
34.

Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago?

Peissig JJ, Tarr MJ.

Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:75-96.

PMID:
16903801
35.
36.

Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework.

Bukach CM, Gauthier I, Tarr MJ.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Apr;10(4):159-66. Epub 2006 Mar 3. Review. Erratum in: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun;10(6):243.

PMID:
16516534
37.
38.

Generating complex three-dimensional stimuli (Greebles) for haptic expertise training.

James TW, Shima DW, Tarr MJ, Gauthier I.

Behav Res Methods. 2005 May;37(2):353-8.

PMID:
16171207
39.

Behavioral change and its neural correlates in visual agnosia after expertise training.

Behrmann M, Marotta J, Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, McKeeff TJ.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Apr;17(4):554-68.

PMID:
15829077
40.

Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts.

Foo P, Warren WH, Duchon A, Tarr MJ.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Mar;31(2):195-215.

PMID:
15755239
41.

The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and Greebles.

Vuong QC, Peissig JJ, Harrison MC, Tarr MJ.

Vision Res. 2005 May;45(10):1213-23. Epub 2004 Dec 19.

42.

Comparing 2D vector field visualization methods: a user study.

Laidlaw DH, Kirby RM, Jackson CD, Davidson JS, Miller TS, da Silva M, Warren WH, Tarr MJ.

IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):59-70.

PMID:
15631129
43.
44.

Are Greebles like faces? Using the neuropsychological exception to test the rule.

Gauthier I, Behrmann M, Tarr MJ.

Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(14):1961-70.

PMID:
15381026
45.

Rotation direction affects object recognition.

Vuong QC, Tarr MJ.

Vision Res. 2004;44(14):1717-30.

46.

Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex.

Rossion B, Joyce CA, Cottrell GW, Tarr MJ.

Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20(3):1609-24.

PMID:
14642472
47.

Is color an intrinsic property of object representation?

Naor-Raz G, Tarr MJ, Kersten D.

Perception. 2003;32(6):667-80.

PMID:
12892428
48.

The influence of conceptual knowledge on visual discrimination.

Gauthier I, James TW, Curby KM, Tarr MJ.

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):507-23. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000275.

PMID:
20957582
49.

Learning to see faces and objects.

Tarr MJ, Cheng YD.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jan;7(1):23-30.

PMID:
12517355
50.

Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond.

Tarr MJ, Warren WH.

Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5 Suppl:1089-92. Review.

PMID:
12403993

Supplemental Content

Support Center