Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 77

1.

Deep Learning to Distinguish Recalled but Benign Mammography Images in Breast Cancer Screening.

Aboutalib SS, Mohamed AA, Berg WA, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Wu S.

Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 11. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1115. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30309858
2.

DCE-MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement Quantified from an Early versus Delayed Post-contrast Sequence: Association with Breast Cancer Presence.

Wu S, Zuley ML, Berg WA, Kurland BF, Jankowitz RC, Sumkin JH, Gur D.

Sci Rep. 2017 May 18;7(1):2115. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02341-8.

3.

Persistent Breast Pain Among Women With Histories of Breast-conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer Compared With Women Without Histories of Breast Surgery or Cancer.

Edmond SN, Shelby RA, Keefe FJ, Fisher HM, Schmidt JE, Soo MS, Skinner CS, Ahrendt GM, Manculich J, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Bovbjerg DH.

Clin J Pain. 2017 Jan;33(1):51-56.

4.

Core Breast Biopsies Showing Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Should Be Excised and Surveillance Is Reasonable for Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia.

Sen LQ, Berg WA, Hooley RJ, Carter GJ, Desouki MM, Sumkin JH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Nov;207(5):1132-1145. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

PMID:
27532153
5.

Breast MRI contrast enhancement kinetics of normal parenchyma correlate with presence of breast cancer.

Wu S, Berg WA, Zuley ML, Kurland BF, Jankowitz RC, Nishikawa R, Gur D, Sumkin JH.

Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Jul 22;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0734-0.

6.

Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.

Sumkin JH, Ganott MA, Chough DM, Catullo VJ, Zuley ML, Shinde DD, Hakim CM, Bandos AI, Gur D.

Acad Radiol. 2015 Dec;22(12):1477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

7.

Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses and Collections Using Transabdominal Ultrasound Guidance.

Ching KC, Sumkin JH.

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2015;2015:283576. doi: 10.1155/2015/283576. Epub 2015 May 31.

8.

Impact of the new density reporting laws: radiologist perceptions and actual behavior.

Gur D, Klym AH, King JL, Bandos AI, Sumkin JH.

Acad Radiol. 2015 Jun;22(6):679-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

PMID:
25837723
9.

New screening technologies and practices: a different approach to estimation of performance improvement by using data from the transition period.

Gur D, Nishikawa RM, Sumkin JH.

Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):9-12. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141843. No abstract available.

PMID:
25799332
10.

Effect of the Availability of Prior Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images on the Interpretation of Mammograms.

Hakim CM, Catullo VJ, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Kelly AE, Shinde DD, Sumkin JH, Wallace LP, Bandos AI, Gur D.

Radiology. 2015 Jul;276(1):65-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15142009. Epub 2015 Mar 13.

11.

Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy versus Fine Needle Aspiration for Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Ganott MA, Zuley ML, Abrams GS, Lu AH, Kelly AE, Sumkin JH, Chivukula M, Carter G, Austin RM, Bandos AI.

ISRN Oncol. 2014 Feb 4;2014:703160. doi: 10.1155/2014/703160. eCollection 2014.

12.

Response.

Gur D, Sumkin JH.

Radiology. 2014 Feb;270(2):628-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
24620375
13.

Response.

Gur D, Sumkin JH.

Radiology. 2014 Jan;270(1):311. No abstract available.

PMID:
24501754
14.

Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.

Zuley ML, Guo B, Catullo VJ, Chough DM, Kelly AE, Lu AH, Rathfon GY, Lee Spangler M, Sumkin JH, Wallace LP, Bandos AI.

Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):664-71. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131530. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

15.

Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study.

Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, Poplack SP, Sumkin JH, Halpern EF, Niklason LT.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Feb;202(2):273-81. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11240.

PMID:
24450665
16.

Screening for early detection of breast cancer: overdiagnosis versus suboptimal patient management.

Gur D, Sumkin JH.

Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):327-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122721. No abstract available.

PMID:
23882095
17.

Integrated 2D and 3D mammography.

Sumkin JH.

Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):e292-3. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70223-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
23816295
18.

Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.

Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, Poplack SP, Sumkin JH, Halpern EF, Niklason LT.

Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):104-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120674. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

19.

Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.

Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Kelly AE, Catullo VJ, Rathfon GY, Lu AH, Gur D.

Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):89-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120552. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

20.

Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment.

Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Wang X, Klym AH, Gur D.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 May 12.

21.

Risk of malignancy when microscopic radial scars and microscopic papillomas are found at percutaneous biopsy.

Lee KA, Zuley ML, Chivukula M, Choksi ND, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Feb;198(2):W141-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7712.

PMID:
22268203
22.

A GMM-based breast cancer risk stratification using a resonance-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy.

Lederman D, Zheng B, Wang X, Sumkin JH, Gur D.

Med Phys. 2011 Mar;38(3):1649-59.

23.

Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm.

Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Chough DM, Hakim CM.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar;196(3):737-41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4760.

PMID:
21343521
24.

Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment.

Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Lederman D, Wang X, Gur D.

Br J Radiol. 2012 Jun;85(1014):e153-61. doi: 10.1259/bjr/51461617. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

25.

Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.

Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Abrams G, Ganott MA, Hakim C, Perrin R, Chough DM, Shah R, Gur D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):320-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4656. Erratum in: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar;196(3):743.

PMID:
21257882
26.

A preliminary evaluation of multi-probe resonance-frequency electrical impedance based measurements of the breast.

Zheng B, Lederman D, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gruss MZ, Lovy LS, Gur D.

Acad Radiol. 2011 Feb;18(2):220-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.09.017. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

27.

Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review.

Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gur D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):W172-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3244. Review.

PMID:
20651178
28.

Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?

Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Zuley ML, Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH.

Acad Radiol. 2010 May;17(5):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.012. Epub 2010 Mar 16.

29.

Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations.

Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Abrams GS, Cohen C, Hakim CM, Sumkin JH, Drescher J, Rockette HE, Gur D.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Apr;17(4):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

PMID:
20036584
30.

Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.

Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Perrin RL, Rathfon GY, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Bandos AI.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):586-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2031.

PMID:
19620460
31.

Agreement of the order of overall performance levels under different reading paradigms.

Gur D, Bandos AI, Klym AH, Cohen CS, Hakim CM, Hardesty LA, Ganott MA, Perrin RL, Poller WR, Shah R, Sumkin JH, Wallace LP, Rockette HE.

Acad Radiol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1567-73. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.07.011.

32.

Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: a comparison.

Gur D, Bandos AI, King JL, Klym AH, Cohen CS, Hakim CM, Hardesty LA, Ganott MA, Perrin RL, Poller WR, Shah R, Sumkin JH, Wallace LP, Rockette HE.

Med Phys. 2008 Oct;35(10):4404-9.

33.

Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: a preliminary study.

Zheng B, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Catullo VJ, Abrams GS, Rathfon GY, Chough DM, Gruss MZ, Gur D.

Med Phys. 2008 Jul;35(7):3041-8.

34.

The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations.

Gur D, Bandos AI, Cohen CS, Hakim CM, Hardesty LA, Ganott MA, Perrin RL, Poller WR, Shah R, Sumkin JH, Wallace LP, Rockette HE.

Radiology. 2008 Oct;249(1):47-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2491072025. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

35.

Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference library.

Zheng B, Mello-Thoms C, Wang XH, Abrams GS, Sumkin JH, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Lu A, Gur D.

Acad Radiol. 2007 Aug;14(8):917-27.

36.

CAD in screening mammography.

Gur D, Sumkin JH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):1474.

PMID:
17114539
37.

Prospective screening study of 0.5 Tesla dedicated magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in young, high-risk women.

Rubinstein WS, Latimer JJ, Sumkin JH, Huerbin M, Grant SG, Vogel VG.

BMC Womens Health. 2006 Jun 26;6:10.

38.

Computer-aided detection with screening mammography: improving performance or simply shifting the operating point?

Sumkin JH, Gur D.

Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):916-7; author reply 917-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
16714469
39.

A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.

Leader JK, Hakim CM, Ganott MA, Chough DM, Wallace LP, Clearfield RJ, Perrin RL, Drescher JM, Maitz GS, Sumkin JH, Gur D.

J Digit Imaging. 2006 Sep;19(3):216-25.

40.

Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer?

Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, King JL, Klym AH, Catullo VJ, Cohen CS, Gur D.

Radiology. 2006 Mar;238(3):793-800.

PMID:
16505392
41.

A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment.

Zheng B, Lu A, Hardesty LA, Sumkin JH, Hakim CM, Ganott MA, Gur D.

Med Phys. 2006 Jan;33(1):111-7.

PMID:
16485416
42.

Stereo CT image compositing methods for lung nodule detection and characterization.

Wang XH, Good WF, Fuhrman CR, Sumkin JH, Britton CA, Golla SK.

Acad Radiol. 2005 Dec;12(12):1512-20.

PMID:
16321739
43.

Is maximum positive predictive value a good indicator of an optimal screening mammography practice?

Hardesty LA, Klym AH, Shindel BE, Chough DM, Sumkin JH, Gur D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 May;184(5):1505-7.

PMID:
15855105
44.

Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice.

Gur D, Wallace LP, Klym AH, Hardesty LA, Abrams GS, Shah R, Sumkin JH.

Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):396-401. Epub 2005 Mar 15.

PMID:
15770039
45.

Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment.

Gur D, Stalder JS, Hardesty LA, Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Chough DM, Shindel BE, Rockette HE.

Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):418-23. Epub 2004 Sep 9.

PMID:
15358846
46.

Re: Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: has promise outstripped performance?

Gur D, Sumkin JH, Hardesty LA, Rockette HE.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 May 5;96(9):717-8; author reply 718. No abstract available.

PMID:
15126614
47.

Recall and detection rates in screening mammography.

Gur D, Sumkin JH, Hardesty LA, Clearfield RJ, Cohen CS, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Harris KM, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace LP, Rockette HE.

Cancer. 2004 Apr 15;100(8):1590-4.

48.

Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.

Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace L.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 4;96(3):185-90.

PMID:
14759985
49.

Epidural labor analgesia for a patient with disseminated lymphangiomatosis.

Nishio I, Mandell GL, Ramanathan S, Sumkin JH.

Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1805-8, table of contents.

PMID:
12761016
50.

Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment initial experience.

Zheng B, Hardesty LA, Poller WR, Sumkin JH, Golla S.

Radiology. 2003 Jul;228(1):58-62. Epub 2003 May 20.

PMID:
12759470

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center