Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 13;115(46):11706-11711. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809962115. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

Shear heating reconciles thermal models with the metamorphic rock record of subduction.

Author information

1
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725; mattkohn@boisestate.edu.
2
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180.
3
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725.
4
Instituto de Ciencias del Mar, Spanish National Research Council, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
5
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, 08010 Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

Some commonly referenced thermal-mechanical models of current subduction zones imply temperatures that are 100-500 °C colder at 30-80-km depth than pressure-temperature conditions determined thermobarometrically from exhumed metamorphic rocks. Accurately inferring subduction zone thermal structure, whether from models or rocks, is crucial for predicting metamorphic reactions and associated fluid release, subarc melting conditions, rheologies, and fault-slip phenomena. Here, we compile surface heat flow data from subduction zones worldwide and show that values are higher than can be explained for a frictionless subduction interface often assumed for modeling. An additional heat source--likely shear heating--is required to explain these forearc heat flow values. A friction coefficient of at least 0.03 and possibly as high as 0.1 in some cases explains these data, and we recommend a provisional average value of 0.05 ± 0.015 for modeling. Even small coefficients of friction can contribute several hundred degrees of heating at depths of 30-80 km. Adding such shear stresses to thermal models quantitatively reproduces the pressure-temperature conditions recorded by exhumed metamorphic rocks. Comparatively higher temperatures generally drive rock dehydration and densification, so, at a given depth, hotter rocks are denser than colder rocks, and harder to exhume through buoyancy mechanisms. Consequently--conversely to previous proposals--exhumed metamorphic rocks might overrepresent old-cold subduction where rocks at the slab interface are wetter and more buoyant than in young-hot subduction zones.

KEYWORDS:

P–T paths; heat flow; metamorphism; subduction; thermal modeling

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center