Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 12;9(1):16585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52300-8.

Computational geometric tools for quantitative comparison of locomotory behavior.

Author information

1
Yale-NUS College, Singapore, Singapore.
2
Yale-NUS College, Singapore, Singapore. ajay.mathuru@yale-nus.edu.sg.
3
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Singapore, Singapore. ajay.mathuru@yale-nus.edu.sg.
4
Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (YLL), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. ajay.mathuru@yale-nus.edu.sg.

Abstract

A fundamental challenge for behavioral neuroscientists is to accurately quantify (dis)similarities in animal behavior without excluding inherent variability present between individuals. We explored two new applications of curve and shape alignment techniques to address this issue. As a proof-of-concept we applied these methods to compare normal or alarmed behavior in pairs of medaka (Oryzias latipes). The curve alignment method we call Behavioral Distortion Distance (BDD) revealed that alarmed fish display less predictable swimming over time, even if individuals incorporate the same action patterns like immobility, sudden changes in swimming trajectory, or changing their position in the water column. The Conformal Spatiotemporal Distance (CSD) technique on the other hand revealed that, in spite of the unpredictability, alarmed individuals exhibit lower variability in overall swim patterns, possibly accounting for the widely held notion of "stereotypy" in alarm responses. More generally, we propose that these new applications of established computational geometric techniques are useful in combination to represent, compare, and quantify complex behaviors consisting of common action patterns that differ in duration, sequence, or frequency.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center