Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 100

1.

Benefits of Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: Data From the House Clinic-University of Southern California-University of California, Los Angeles Clinical Trial.

Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ, Wilkinson EP, Mills D, Hagan SC, Lupo JE, Padilla M, Shannon RV.

Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):766-781. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000671.

PMID:
30358655
2.

Initial Results of a Safety and Feasibility Study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Congenitally Deaf Children.

Wilkinson EP, Eisenberg LS, Krieger MD, Schwartz MS, Winter M, Glater JL, Martinez AS, Fisher LM, Shannon RV; Los Angeles Pediatric ABI Team.

Otol Neurotol. 2017 Feb;38(2):212-220. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001287.

3.

Consensus statement: Long-term results of ABI in children with complex inner ear malformations and decision making between CI and ABI.

Sennaroğlu L, Colletti V, Lenarz T, Manrique M, Laszig R, Rask-Andersen H, Göksu N, Offeciers E, Saeed S, Behr R, Bayazıt Y, Casselman J, Freeman S, Kileny P, Lee DJ, Shannon RV, Kameswaran M, Hagr A, Zarowski A, Schwartz MS, Bilginer B, Kishore A, Sennaroğlu G, Yücel E, Saraç S, Ataş A, Colletti L, O'Driscoll M, Moon IS, Gärtner L, Huarte A, Nyberg G, Mocan BÖ, Atay G, Bajin MD, Çınar BÇ, Batuk MÖ, Yaralı M, Aydınlı FE, Aslan F, Kirazlı MC, Özkan HB, Hans JM, Kosaner J, Polak M.

Cochlear Implants Int. 2016 Jul;17(4):163-171. Epub 2016 Jul 21. No abstract available.

PMID:
27442073
4.

Is Birdsong More Like Speech or Music?

Shannon RV.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):245-247. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

PMID:
26944220
5.

Regulatory and funding strategies to develop a safety study of an auditory brainstem implant in young children who are deaf.

Fisher LM, Eisenberg LS, Krieger M, Wilkinson EP, Shannon RV; Los Angeles Pediatric ABI Team.

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Sep;49(5):659-665. No abstract available.

6.

Two Laskers and Counting: Learning From the Past Enables Future Innovations With Central Neural Prostheses.

Lim HH, Shannon RV.

Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):439-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 29. No abstract available.

PMID:
25468073
7.

Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Shannon RV.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 17. Review.

8.

The development of auditory perception in children after auditory brainstem implantation.

Colletti L, Shannon RV, Colletti V.

Audiol Neurootol. 2014;19(6):386-94. doi: 10.1159/000363684. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

9.

Training improves cochlear implant rate discrimination on a psychophysical task.

Goldsworthy RL, Shannon RV.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jan;135(1):334-41. doi: 10.1121/1.4835735.

10.

Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Srinivasan AG, Padilla M, Shannon RV, Landsberger DM.

Hear Res. 2013 May;299:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

11.

Improving virtual channel discrimination in a multi-channel context.

Srinivasan AG, Shannon RV, Landsberger DM.

Hear Res. 2012 Apr;286(1-2):19-29.

12.

Histopathological analysis of a 15-year user of an auditory brainstem implant.

Otto SR, Moore J, Linthicum F, Hitselberger W, Brackmann D, Shannon RV.

Laryngoscope. 2012 Mar;122(3):645-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.22491. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

13.

Advances in auditory prostheses.

Shannon RV.

Curr Opin Neurol. 2012 Feb;25(1):61-6. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834ef878. Review.

14.

Estimated net saving to society from cochlear implantation in infants: a preliminary analysis.

Colletti L, Mandalà M, Shannon RV, Colletti V.

Laryngoscope. 2011 Nov;121(11):2455-60. doi: 10.1002/lary.22131.

PMID:
22020896
15.

Infants versus older children fitted with cochlear implants: performance over 10 years.

Colletti L, Mandalà M, Zoccante L, Shannon RV, Colletti V.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Apr;75(4):504-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

PMID:
21277638
16.

Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation.

Srinivasan AG, Landsberger DM, Shannon RV.

Hear Res. 2010 Dec 1;270(1-2):89-100. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

17.

Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.

Shannon RV, Cruz RJ, Galvin JJ 3rd.

Audiol Neurootol. 2011;16(2):113-23. doi: 10.1159/000315115. Epub 2010 Jul 17.

18.

Complications in auditory brainstem implant surgery in adults and children.

Colletti V, Shannon RV, Carner M, Veronese S, Colletti L.

Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jun;31(4):558-64. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181db7055.

PMID:
20393378
19.

Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users.

Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ, Shannon RV.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:518-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04551.x.

20.

Progress in restoration of hearing with the auditory brainstem implant.

Colletti V, Shannon RV, Carner M, Veronese S, Colletti L.

Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:333-45. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17523-4. Review.

PMID:
19660666
21.

Beyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain.

Moore DR, Shannon RV.

Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):686-91. doi: 10.1038/nn.2326. Epub 2009 May 26. Review.

PMID:
19471266
22.

Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels.

Friesen LM, Tremblay KL, Rohila N, Wright RA, Shannon RV, Başkent D, Rubinstein JT.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;120(4):776-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 27.

23.

Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant.

Otto SR, Shannon RV, Wilkinson EP, Hitselberger WE, McCreery DB, Moore JK, Brackmann DE.

Otol Neurotol. 2008 Dec;29(8):1147-54. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818becb4.

PMID:
18931643
24.

Auditory brainstem implants.

Schwartz MS, Otto SR, Shannon RV, Hitselberger WE, Brackmann DE.

Neurotherapeutics. 2008 Jan;5(1):128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.10.068. Review.

25.

Combined effects of frequency compression-expansion and shift on speech recognition.

Başkent D, Shannon RV.

Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):277-89.

PMID:
17485977
26.

Understanding hearing through deafness.

Shannon RV.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 24;104(17):6883-4. Epub 2007 Apr 17. No abstract available.

27.

Frequency transposition around dead regions simulated with a noiseband vocoder.

Başkent D, Shannon RV.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Feb;119(2):1156-63.

PMID:
16521776
28.

Speech and music have different requirements for spectral resolution.

Shannon RV.

Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;70:121-34. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
16472633
29.

Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions.

Stickney GS, Loizou PC, Mishra LN, Assmann PF, Shannon RV, Opie JM.

Hear Res. 2006 Jan;211(1-2):33-45. Epub 2005 Dec 9.

PMID:
16338109
30.

Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?

Colletti V, Shannon RV.

Laryngoscope. 2005 Nov;115(11):1974-8.

PMID:
16319608
31.

Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.

Chatterjee M, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ, Shannon RV.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Mar;7(1):15-25. Epub 2005 Nov 4.

32.

Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping.

Başkent D, Shannon RV.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Mar;117(3 Pt 1):1405-16.

PMID:
15807028
33.

Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Cruz RJ.

Audiol Neurootol. 2005 May-Jun;10(3):169-84. Epub 2005 Feb 17.

PMID:
15724088
34.

Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners.

Başkent D, Shannon RV.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Nov;116(5):3130-40.

PMID:
15603158
35.

The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation.

Shannon RV, Fu QJ, Galvin J 3rd.

Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2004 May;(552):50-4. Review.

PMID:
15219048
36.

The multichannel auditory brainstem implant: how many electrodes make sense?

Kuchta J, Otto SR, Shannon RV, Hitselberger WE, Brackmann DE.

J Neurosurg. 2004 Jan;100(1):16-23.

PMID:
14743907
37.

Use of a multichannel auditory brainstem implant for neurofibromatosis type 2.

Schwartz MS, Otto SR, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE, Shannon RV.

Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2003;81(1-4):110-4.

PMID:
14742973
38.

Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.

Baskent D, Shannon RV.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr;113(4 Pt 1):2064-76.

PMID:
12703717
39.
40.

Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Galvin JJ 3rd.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Oct;112(4):1664-74.

PMID:
12398471
41.

Frequency mapping in cochlear implants.

Fu QJ, Shannon RV.

Ear Hear. 2002 Aug;23(4):339-48.

PMID:
12195176
42.

Holes in hearing.

Shannon RV, Galvin JJ 3rd, Baskent D.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2002 Jun;3(2):185-99.

43.

Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patients.

Otto SR, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE, Shannon RV, Kuchta J.

J Neurosurg. 2002 Jun;96(6):1063-71.

PMID:
12066908
44.

Sending sound to the brain.

Rauschecker JP, Shannon RV.

Science. 2002 Feb 8;295(5557):1025-9. Review.

PMID:
11834822
45.

Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63.

PMID:
11519582
46.

Brainstem electronic implants for bilateral anacusis following surgical removal of cerebello pontine angle lesions.

Otto SR, Brackman DE, Hitselberger WE, Shannon RV.

Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001 Apr;34(2):485-99.

PMID:
11419419
47.

Effects of electrode location on speech recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Slattery WH 3rd.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 Sep;11(8):418-28.

PMID:
11012237
48.
49.

Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.

Eisenberg LS, Shannon RV, Martinez AS, Wygonski J, Boothroyd A.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 May;107(5 Pt 1):2704-10.

PMID:
10830392
50.

Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners.

Chatterjee M, Fu QJ, Shannon RV.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Mar;107(3):1637-44.

PMID:
10738817

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center