Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 51

1.

Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.

Jones CW, Adams A, Weaver MA, Schroter S, Misemer BS, Schriger D, Platts-Mills TF.

BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e028694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028694.

2.

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: a randomised controlled trial.

Schroter S, Pakpoor J, Morris J, Chew M, Godlee F.

BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025029. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025029.

3.

Biomedical authors' awareness of publication ethics: an international survey.

Schroter S, Roberts J, Loder E, Penzien DB, Mahadeo S, Houle TT.

BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e021282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021282.

4.

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers.

Price A, Schroter S, Clarke M, McAneney H.

BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 24;8(9):e021753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021753.

5.

Better together: patient partnership in medical journals.

Richards T, Schroter S, Price A, Godlee F.

BMJ. 2018 Sep 10;362:k3798. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3798. No abstract available.

PMID:
30201610
6.

Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals.

Schroter S, Price A, Flemyng E, Demaine A, Elliot J, Harmston RR, Richards T, Staniszewska S, Stephens R.

BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 5;8(9):e023357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023357.

7.

Early Experiences With Journal Data Sharing Policies: A Survey of Published Clinical Trial Investigators.

Tannenbaum S, Ross JS, Krumholz HM, Desai NR, Ritchie JD, Lehman R, Gamble GM, Bachand J, Schroter S, Groves T, Gross CP.

Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 16;169(8):586-588. doi: 10.7326/M18-0723. Epub 2018 Jul 17. No abstract available.

PMID:
30014127
8.

Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study.

Price A, Schroter S, Snow R, Hicks M, Harmston R, Staniszewska S, Parker S, Richards T.

BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 23;8(3):e020452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020452.

9.

Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire.

Lillevik SA, Schroter S, Hanssen TA.

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jan;17(1):36-44. doi: 10.1177/1474515117715841. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

PMID:
28617044
10.

Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses.

Toews I, Booth A, Berg RC, Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas HM, Noyes J, Schroter S, Meerpohl JJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

11.

Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot.

Schroter S, Miles R, Green S, Jackson M.

BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 28;7(2):e015915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915.

12.

Co-creating health: more than a dream.

Richards T, Snow R, Schroter S.

BMJ. 2016 Sep 15;354:i4550. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4550. No abstract available.

PMID:
27633967
13.

Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project.

Dixon-Woods M, Foy C, Hayden C, Al-Shahi Salman R, Tebbutt S, Schroter S.

BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 31;6(8):e011973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011973.

14.

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Schroter S, Pakpoor J, Morris J, Chew M, Godlee F.

BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 10;6(6):e012677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012677.

15.

Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ.

Weston J, Dwan K, Altman D, Clarke M, Gamble C, Schroter S, Williamson P, Kirkham J.

BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 22;6(4):e010075. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010075.

16.

The BMJ editors respond.

Loder E, Groves T, Schroter S, Merino JG, Weber W, Godlee F.

BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1492. No abstract available.

PMID:
26979466
17.

Qualitative research and The BMJ.

Loder E, Groves T, Schroter S, Merino JG, Weber W.

BMJ. 2016 Feb 10;352:i641. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i641. No abstract available.

PMID:
26865061
18.

Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive study.

Barbour V, Burch D, Godlee F, Heneghan C, Lehman R, Perera R, Ross JS, Schroter S.

Trials. 2016 Jan 21;17:31. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1107-1.

19.

Logging The BMJ's "patient journey".

Richards T, Snow R, Schroter S.

BMJ. 2015 Aug 17;351:h4396. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4396. No abstract available.

PMID:
26283221
20.

Improving the transparency of prognosis research: the role of reporting, data sharing, registration, and protocols.

Peat G, Riley RD, Croft P, Morley KI, Kyzas PA, Moons KG, Perel P, Steyerberg EW, Schroter S, Altman DG, Hemingway H; PROGRESS Group.

PLoS Med. 2014 Jul 8;11(7):e1001671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001671. eCollection 2014 Jul. No abstract available.

21.

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.

Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, van der Windt DA, Hayden JA, Perel P, Schroter S, Riley RD, Hemingway H, Altman DG; PROGRESS Group.

PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Review.

22.

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research.

Riley RD, Hayden JA, Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, Abrams K, Kyzas PA, Malats N, Briggs A, Schroter S, Altman DG, Hemingway H; PROGRESS Group.

PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001380. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Review.

23.

Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: stratified medicine research.

Hingorani AD, Windt DA, Riley RD, Abrams K, Moons KG, Steyerberg EW, Schroter S, Sauerbrei W, Altman DG, Hemingway H; PROGRESS Group.

BMJ. 2013 Feb 5;346:e5793. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5793. No abstract available.

24.

Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: a framework for researching clinical outcomes.

Hemingway H, Croft P, Perel P, Hayden JA, Abrams K, Timmis A, Briggs A, Udumyan R, Moons KG, Steyerberg EW, Roberts I, Schroter S, Altman DG, Riley RD; PROGRESS Group.

BMJ. 2013 Feb 5;346:e5595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5595. No abstract available.

25.

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials.

Schroter S, Glasziou P, Heneghan C.

BMJ Open. 2012 Nov 22;2(6). pii: e001978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001978. Print 2012.

26.

Evaluation of an online interactive Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) versus online self-directed learning: a randomised controlled trial.

Schroter S, Jenkins RD, Playle RA, Walsh KM, Probert C, Kellner T, Arnhofer G, Owens DR.

BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jun 16;11:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-35.

27.

International challenges without borders: a descriptive study of family physicians' educational needs in the field of diabetes.

Murray S, Lazure P, Schroter S, Leuschner PJ, Posel P, Kellner T, Jenkins RD.

BMC Fam Pract. 2011 May 11;12:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-27.

28.

Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives.

Schroter S, Groves T, Højgaard L.

BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:62. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-62.

29.

Evaluation of an online Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) for health professionals: a randomised controlled trial.

Schroter S, Jenkins D, Playle R, Walsh K, Probert C, Kellner T, Arnhofer G, Owens D.

Trials. 2009 Jul 30;10:63. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-63.

30.

What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Godlee F, Osorio L, Smith R.

J R Soc Med. 2008 Oct;101(10):507-14. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080062.

31.

What happens to papers rejected by the BMJ on ethical grounds.

Pace NA, Owen M, Schroter S.

BMJ. 2008 Oct 1;337:a1880. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1880. No abstract available.

PMID:
18829662
32.

Eliciting and using expert opinions about dropout bias in randomized controlled trials.

White IR, Carpenter J, Evans S, Schroter S.

Clin Trials. 2007;4(2):125-39.

PMID:
17456512
33.

Response to Scientific journals are 'faith based': is there a science behind peer review?

Schroter S.

J R Soc Med. 2007 Mar;100(3):117-8. No abstract available.

34.

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey.

Tite L, Schroter S.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Jan;61(1):9-12.

35.

From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal.

Schriger DL, Sinha R, Schroter S, Liu PY, Altman DG.

Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):750-6, 756.e1-21. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

PMID:
16978740
36.

Evidence based publishing.

Tite L, Schroter S.

BMJ. 2006 Aug 19;333(7564):366. No abstract available.

37.
38.
39.
40.
41.

Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors.

Schroter S, Tite L, Smith R.

BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):756. Epub 2005 Jan 26.

42.

How should abridged scientific articles be presented in journals? A survey of readers and authors.

Müllner M, Waechter F, Schroter S, Squire B.

CMAJ. 2005 Jan 18;172(2):203-5.

43.

Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest.

Haivas I, Schroter S, Waechter F, Smith R.

CMAJ. 2004 Aug 31;171(5):475-6. No abstract available.

44.

Authors' perceptions of electronic publishing: two cross sectional surveys.

Schroter S, Barratt H, Smith J.

BMJ. 2004 Jun 5;328(7452):1350-3. Epub 2004 May 19.

45.

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.

Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Carpenter J, Godlee F, Smith R.

BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):673. Epub 2004 Mar 2.

46.

Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers' perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trial.

Schroter S, Morris J, Chaudhry S, Smith R, Barratt H.

BMJ. 2004 Mar 27;328(7442):742-3. Epub 2004 Feb 23. No abstract available.

47.
49.

Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial.

Chaudhry S, Schroter S, Smith R, Morris J.

BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1391-2. No abstract available.

50.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center