Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 10;28(50):13703-11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4270-08.2008.

The sensory insular cortex mediates the stress-buffering effects of safety signals but not behavioral control.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA. john.christianson@colorado.edu

Abstract

Safety signals are learned cues that predict stress-free periods whereas behavioral control is the ability to modify a stressor by behavioral actions. Both serve to attenuate the effects of stressors such as uncontrollable shocks. Internal and external cues produced by a controlling behavior are followed by a stressor-free interval, and so it is possible that safety learning is fundamental to the effect of control. If this is the case then behavioral control and safety should recruit the same neural machinery. Interestingly, safety signals that prevented a behavioral outcome of stressor exposure that is also blocked by control (reduced social exploration) failed to inhibit activity in the dorsal raphé nucleus or use the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, the mechanisms by which behavioral control operates. However, bilateral lesions to a region of posterior insular cortex, termed the "sensory insula," prevented the effect of safety but not of behavioral control, providing a double-dissociation. These results indicate that stressor-modulators can recruit distinct neural circuitry and imply a critical role of the sensory insula in safety learning.

PMID:
19074043
PMCID:
PMC2667691
DOI:
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4270-08.2008
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center