Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Plant Physiol. 2017 Apr;173(4):2253-2264. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01738. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

EARLY FLOWERING3 Redundancy Fine-Tunes Photoperiod Sensitivity.

Author information

1
School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (A.J.S.R., V.H., J.K.V., L.C.L., J.L.W.); and.
2
INRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie, F-21065, Dijon, France (G.A., J.B.).
3
School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (A.J.S.R., V.H., J.K.V., L.C.L., J.L.W.); and jim.weller@utas.edu.au.
4
INRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie, F-21065, Dijon, France (G.A., J.B.) jim.weller@utas.edu.au.

Abstract

Three pea (Pisum sativum) loci controlling photoperiod sensitivity, HIGH RESPONSE (HR), DIE NEUTRALIS (DNE), and STERILE NODES (SN), have recently been shown to correspond to orthologs of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) circadian clock genes EARLY FLOWERING3 (ELF3), ELF4, and LUX ARRHYTHMO, respectively. A fourth pea locus, PHOTOPERIOD (PPD), also contributes to the photoperiod response in a similar manner to SN and DNE, and recessive ppd mutants on a spring-flowering hr mutant background show early, photoperiod-insensitive flowering. However, the molecular identity of PPD has so far remained elusive. Here, we show that the PPD locus also has a role in maintenance of diurnal and circadian gene expression rhythms and identify PPD as an ELF3 co-ortholog, termed ELF3b Genetic interactions between pea ELF3 genes suggest that loss of PPD function does not affect flowering time in the presence of functional HR, whereas PPD can compensate only partially for the lack of HR These results provide an illustration of how gene duplication and divergence can generate potential for the emergence of more subtle variations in phenotype that may be adaptively significant.

PMID:
28202598
PMCID:
PMC5373058
DOI:
10.1104/pp.16.01738
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center