Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 37

1.

Black-headed gulls synchronise their activity with their nearest neighbours.

Evans MHR, Lihou KL, Rands SA.

Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28378-x.

2.

Bumblebees distinguish floral scent patterns, and can transfer these to corresponding visual patterns.

Lawson DA, Chittka L, Whitney HM, Rands SA.

Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 13;285(1880). pii: 20180661. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0661.

3.

Colour as a backup for scent in the presence of olfactory noise: testing the efficacy backup hypothesis using bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Lawson DA, Whitney HM, Rands SA.

R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Nov 29;4(11):170996. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170996. eCollection 2017 Nov.

4.

The diversity of floral temperature patterns, and their use by pollinators.

Harrap MJ, Rands SA, Hempel de Ibarra N, Whitney HM.

Elife. 2017 Dec 19;6. pii: e31262. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31262.

5.

Leaving safety to visit a feeding site: is it optimal to hesitate while exposed?

Rands SA.

R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 11;4(1):160910. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160910. eCollection 2017 Jan.

6.

Bumblebees can discriminate between scent-marks deposited by conspecifics.

Pearce RF, Giuggioli L, Rands SA.

Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 7;7:43872. doi: 10.1038/srep43872.

7.

Consensus and experience trump leadership, suppressing individual personality during social foraging.

McDonald ND, Rands SA, Hill F, Elder C, Ioannou CC.

Sci Adv. 2016 Sep 14;2(9):e1600892. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600892. eCollection 2016 Sep.

8.

Flower Iridescence Increases Object Detection in the Insect Visual System without Compromising Object Identity.

Whitney HM, Reed A, Rands SA, Chittka L, Glover BJ.

Curr Biol. 2016 Mar 21;26(6):802-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.026. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

9.

Nearest-neighbour clusters as a novel technique for assessing group associations.

Rands SA.

R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Jan 21;2(1):140232. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140232. eCollection 2015 Jan.

10.

Dominance rank is associated with body condition in outdoor-living domestic horses (Equus caballus).

Giles SL, Nicol CJ, Harris PA, Rands SA.

Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015 May;166:71-79.

11.

Assessing the seasonal prevalence and risk factors for nuchal crest adiposity in domestic horses and ponies using the Cresty Neck Score.

Giles SL, Nicol CJ, Rands SA, Harris PA.

BMC Vet Res. 2015 Jan 31;11:13. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0327-7.

13.

Red deer synchronise their activity with close neighbours.

Rands SA, Muir H, Terry NL.

PeerJ. 2014 Apr 10;2:e344. doi: 10.7717/peerj.344. eCollection 2014.

14.

Obesity prevalence and associated risk factors in outdoor living domestic horses and ponies.

Giles SL, Rands SA, Nicol CJ, Harris PA.

PeerJ. 2014 Mar 20;2:e299. doi: 10.7717/peerj.299. eCollection 2014.

15.

Mobbing and sitting tight at the nest as methods of avoiding brood parasitism.

Rands SA.

Interface Focus. 2012 Apr 6;2(2):217-25. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0080. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

16.

The influence of pigmentation patterning on bumblebee foraging from flowers of Antirrhinum majus.

Whitney HM, Milne G, Rands SA, Vignolini S, Martin C, Glover BJ.

Naturwissenschaften. 2013 Mar;100(3):249-56. doi: 10.1007/s00114-013-1020-y. Epub 2013 Feb 19.

PMID:
23420080
17.
18.

A technique for measuring petal gloss, with examples from the Namaqualand flora.

Whitney HM, Rands SA, Elton NJ, Ellis AG.

PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029476. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

19.

The dynamics of honesty: modelling the growth of costly, sexually-selected ornaments.

Rands SA, Evans MR, Johnstone RA.

PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027174. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

20.

The effects of dominance on leadership and energetic gain: a dynamic game between pairs of social foragers.

Rands SA.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002252. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

21.

Field margins, foraging distances and their impacts on nesting pollinator success.

Rands SA, Whitney HM.

PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025971. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

22.

Approximating optimal behavioural strategies down to rules-of-thumb: energy reserve changes in pairs of social foragers.

Rands SA.

PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022104. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

23.

Self-improvement for team-players: the effects of individual effort on aggregated group information.

Rands SA.

PLoS One. 2010 Jul 21;5(7):e11705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011705.

24.

Group-movement 'initiation' and state-dependent decision-making.

Rands SA.

Behav Processes. 2010 Jul;84(3):668-70. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Mar 18. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
20303397
25.
26.

Sexual selection and condition-dependence.

Johnstone RA, Rands SA, Evans MR.

J Evol Biol. 2009 Dec;22(12):2387-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01822.x. Epub 2009 Oct 27.

27.

The interaction of temperature and sucrose concentration on foraging preferences in bumblebees.

Whitney HM, Dyer A, Chittka L, Rands SA, Glover BJ.

Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Sep;95(9):845-50. doi: 10.1007/s00114-008-0393-9. Epub 2008 Jun 4.

PMID:
18523748
28.

Floral temperature and optimal foraging: is heat a feasible floral reward for pollinators?

Rands SA, Whitney HM.

PLoS One. 2008 Apr 23;3(4):e2007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002007.

29.

The emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs when the qualities of individuals differ.

Rands SA, Cowlishaw G, Pettifor RA, Rowcliffe JM, Johnstone RA.

BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Feb 18;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-51.

30.
32.

Explaining individual variation in patterns of mass loss in breeding birds.

Rands SA, Cuthill IC, Houston AI.

Theor Biol Med Model. 2006 May 16;3:20.

33.

State-dependent foraging rules for social animals in selfish herds.

Rands SA, Pettifor RA, Rowcliffe JM, Cowlishaw G.

Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 22;271(1557):2613-20.

34.

Optimal parasite infection strategies: a state-dependent approach.

Fenton A, Rands SA.

Int J Parasitol. 2004 Jun;34(7):813-21.

PMID:
15157764
35.

Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs.

Rands SA, Cowlishaw G, Pettifor RA, Rowcliffe JM, Johnstone RA.

Nature. 2003 May 22;423(6938):432-4.

PMID:
12761547
36.
37.

Prey processing in central place foragers.

Rands SA, Houston AI, Gasson CE.

J Theor Biol. 2000 Jan 21;202(2):161-74.

PMID:
10640435

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center