Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 4

1.

Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications.

Pier EL, Brauer M, Filut A, Kaatz A, Raclaw J, Nathan MJ, Ford CE, Carnes M.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 20;115(12):2952-2957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714379115. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

2.

Laughter and the Management of Divergent Positions in Peer Review Interactions.

Raclaw J, Ford CE.

J Pragmat. 2017 May;113:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

3.

'Your comments are meaner than your score': score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review.

Pier EL, Raclaw J, Kaatz A, Brauer M, Carnes M, Nathan MJ, Ford CE.

Res Eval. 2017 Jan;26(1):1-14. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvw025. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

4.

Providing Epistemic Support For Assessments Through Mobile-Supported Sharing Activities.

Raclaw J, Robles JS, DiDomenico SM.

Res Lang Soc Interact. 2016;49(4):362-379. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2016.1199089. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center