Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 9


The more you get, the more you give: Positive cascading effects shape the evolutionary potential of prenatal maternal investment.

Pick JL, Postma E, Tschirren B.

Evol Lett. 2019 Jul 2;3(4):412-423. doi: 10.1002/evl3.125. eCollection 2019 Aug.


Divide and conquer? Size adjustment with allometry and intermediate outcomes.

Nakagawa S, Kar F, O'Dea RE, Pick JL, Lagisz M.

BMC Biol. 2017 Nov 9;15(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0448-5.


Divergent artificial selection for female reproductive investment has a sexually concordant effect on male reproductive success.

Pick JL, Hutter P, Tschirren B.

Evol Lett. 2017 Aug 23;1(4):222-228. doi: 10.1002/evl3.21. eCollection 2017 Sep.


A trade-off between reproductive investment and maternal cerebellum size in a precocial bird.

Ebneter C, Pick JL, Tschirren B.

Biol Lett. 2016 Dec;12(12). pii: 20160659. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0659.


House sparrows.

Nakagawa S, Pick JL.

Curr Biol. 2016 Nov 21;26(22):R1171-R1173. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.047.


Disentangling Genetic and Prenatal Maternal Effects on Offspring Size and Survival.

Pick JL, Ebneter C, Hutter P, Tschirren B.

Am Nat. 2016 Dec;188(6):628-639. Epub 2016 Oct 24.


Matrilineal inheritance of a key mediator of prenatal maternal effects.

Tschirren B, Ziegler AK, Pick JL, Okuliarov√° M, Zeman M, Giraudeau M.

Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Sep 14;283(1838). pii: 20161676. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1676.


Artificial selection reveals the energetic expense of producing larger eggs.

Pick JL, Hutter P, Ebneter C, Ziegler AK, Giordano M, Tschirren B.

Front Zool. 2016 Aug 23;13(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12983-016-0172-y. eCollection 2016.


In search of genetic constraints limiting the evolution of egg size: direct and correlated responses to artificial selection on a prenatal maternal effector.

Pick JL, Hutter P, Tschirren B.

Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Jun;116(6):542-9. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.16. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

Supplemental Content

Support Center