Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 30

1.

Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.

Pennycook G, Cannon TD, Rand DG.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1865-1880. doi: 10.1037/xge0000465. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

PMID:
30247057
2.

Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.

Pennycook G, Rand DG.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Jul 1:146167218783192. doi: 10.1177/0146167218783192. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
29985107
3.

Do smart people have better intuitions?

Thompson VA, Pennycook G, Trippas D, Evans JSBT.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jul;147(7):945-961. doi: 10.1037/xge0000457.

PMID:
29975089
4.

Characterizing belief bias in syllogistic reasoning: A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis of ROC data.

Trippas D, Kellen D, Singmann H, Pennycook G, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA, Dubé C.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2141-2174. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1460-7.

5.

The Mythical Dual-Process Typology.

Pennycook G, Neys W, Evans JSBT, Stanovich KE, Thompson VA.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Aug;22(8):667-668. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Jun 21. No abstract available.

PMID:
29937320
6.

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.

Pennycook G, Rand DG.

Cognition. 2018 Jun 20. pii: S0010-0277(18)30163-X. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
29935897
7.

An analysis of the Canadian cognitive psychology job market (2006-2016).

Pennycook G, Thompson VA.

Can J Exp Psychol. 2018 Jun;72(2):71-80. doi: 10.1037/cep0000149.

PMID:
29902028
8.

The science of fake news.

Lazer DMJ, Baum MA, Benkler Y, Berinsky AJ, Greenhill KM, Menczer F, Metzger MJ, Nyhan B, Pennycook G, Rothschild D, Schudson M, Sloman SA, Sunstein CR, Thorson EA, Watts DJ, Zittrain JL.

Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8. No abstract available.

PMID:
29590025
9.

The evolution of analytic thought?

Pennycook G, Rand DG.

Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e215. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16001746.

PMID:
29342671
10.

The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures.

Bialek M, Pennycook G.

Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1953-1959. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0963-x.

PMID:
28849403
11.

Correction: Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis.

Pennycook G, Ross RM, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA.

PLoS One. 2017 Apr 21;12(4):e0176586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176586. eCollection 2017.

12.

Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence.

Pennycook G, Ross RM, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1774-1784. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7.

PMID:
28224482
13.

Analytic cognitive style, not delusional ideation, predicts data gathering in a large beads task study.

Ross RM, Pennycook G, McKay R, Gervais WM, Langdon R, Coltheart M.

Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2016 Jul;21(4):300-314. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

PMID:
27341507
14.

Commentary: Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference.

Pennycook G, Fugelsang JA, Koehler DJ, Thompson VA.

Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 5;7:1174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01174. eCollection 2016. No abstract available.

15.

Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis.

Pennycook G, Ross RM, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA.

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):e0153039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153039. eCollection 2016. Review. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2017 Apr 21;12 (4):e0176586.

16.

Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making.

Pennycook G, Ross RM.

Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 22;7:9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009. eCollection 2016. No abstract available.

17.

Going against the Herd: Psychological and Cultural Factors Underlying the 'Vaccination Confidence Gap'.

Browne M, Thomson P, Rockloff MJ, Pennycook G.

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0132562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132562. eCollection 2015.

18.

What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.

Pennycook G, Fugelsang JA, Koehler DJ.

Cogn Psychol. 2015 Aug;80:34-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

PMID:
26091582
19.

Disfluent fonts don't help people solve math problems.

Meyer A, Frederick S, Burnham TC, Guevara Pinto JD, Boyer TW, Ball LJ, Pennycook G, Ackerman R, Thompson VA, Schuldt JP.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):e16-30. doi: 10.1037/xge0000049.

PMID:
25844628
20.

Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?

Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA.

Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):341-8. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1.

PMID:
25740762
21.

Base rates: both neglected and intuitive.

Pennycook G, Trippas D, Handley SJ, Thompson VA.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):544-54. doi: 10.1037/a0034887. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

PMID:
24219086
22.

Cognitive style and religiosity: the role of conflict detection.

Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Barr N, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA.

Mem Cognit. 2014 Jan;42(1):1-10. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7.

PMID:
23784742
23.

The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency in the monitoring and control of reasoning: reply to Oppenheimer, and Epley (2013).

Thompson VA, Ackerman R, Sidi Y, Ball LJ, Pennycook G, Prowse Turner JA.

Cognition. 2013 Aug;128(2):256-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

PMID:
23571071
24.

Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics.

Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):806-11. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0394-3.

PMID:
23397237
25.

The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking.

Thompson VA, Turner JA, Pennycook G, Ball LJ, Brack H, Ophir Y, Ackerman R.

Cognition. 2013 Aug;128(2):237-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Erratum in: Cognition. 2014 Jan;130(1):140.

PMID:
23158572
26.

Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?

Pennycook G, Fugelsang JA, Koehler DJ.

Cognition. 2012 Jul;124(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 8.

PMID:
22575046
27.

Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.

Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Seli P, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA.

Cognition. 2012 Jun;123(3):335-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

PMID:
22481051
28.

Reasoning with base rates is routine, relatively effortless, and context dependent.

Pennycook G, Thompson VA.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Jun;19(3):528-34. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0249-3.

PMID:
22427266
29.

Intuition, reason, and metacognition.

Thompson VA, Prowse Turner JA, Pennycook G.

Cogn Psychol. 2011 Nov;63(3):107-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

PMID:
21798215
30.

Helicopter in transit care of the critically ill--the Whangarei experience.

Nagappan R, Barker J, Riddell T, Maiden NJ, Lindsay S, Pennycook GA, Ellwood R.

N Z Med J. 2000 Jul 28;113(1114):303-5.

PMID:
10972308

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center