Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 18

1.

A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.

Christensen OF, Nielsen B, Su G, Xiang T, Madsen P, Ostersen T, Velander I, Strathe AB.

Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Aug 19;51(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0486-2.

2.

Use of Repeated Group Measurements with Drop Out Animals for Variance Component Estimation and Genetic Evaluation: A Simulation Study.

Gao H, Nielsen B, Su G, Madsen P, Jensen J, Christensen OF, Ostersen T, Shirali M.

G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Sep 4;9(9):2935-2940. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400484.

3.

Estimation of variance components and prediction of breeding values based on group records from varying group sizes.

Su G, Madsen P, Nielsen B, Ostersen T, Shirali M, Jensen J, Christensen OF.

Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Aug 14;50(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0413-y.

4.

Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.

Guo X, Christensen OF, Ostersen T, Wang Y, Lund MS, Su G.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Sep 13;48(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0245-6.

5.

Sparse single-step method for genomic evaluation in pigs.

Ostersen T, Christensen OF, Madsen P, Henryon M.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Jun 29;48(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0227-8.

6.

Increased prediction accuracy using a genomic feature model including prior information on quantitative trait locus regions in purebred Danish Duroc pigs.

Sarup P, Jensen J, Ostersen T, Henryon M, Sørensen P.

BMC Genet. 2016 Jan 5;17:11. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0322-9.

7.

Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels.

Xiang T, Ma P, Ostersen T, Legarra A, Christensen OF.

Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Jun 30;47:54. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0134-4.

8.

Most of the long-term genetic gain from optimum-contribution selection can be realised with restrictions imposed during optimisation.

Henryon M, Ostersen T, Ask B, Sørensen AC, Berg P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Mar 28;47:21. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0107-7.

9.

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.

Guo X, Christensen OF, Ostersen T, Wang Y, Lund MS, Su G.

J Anim Sci. 2015 Feb;93(2):503-12.

PMID:
25549983
10.

Genome-wide association and pathway analysis of feed efficiency in pigs reveal candidate genes and pathways for residual feed intake.

Do DN, Strathe AB, Ostersen T, Pant SD, Kadarmideen HN.

Front Genet. 2014 Sep 9;5:307. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00307. eCollection 2014.

11.

Genome-wide association and systems genetic analyses of residual feed intake, daily feed consumption, backfat and weight gain in pigs.

Do DN, Ostersen T, Strathe AB, Mark T, Jensen J, Kadarmideen HN.

BMC Genet. 2014 Feb 17;15:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-27.

12.

Genome-wide and local pattern of linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase for 3 Danish pig breeds.

Wang L, Sørensen P, Janss L, Ostersen T, Edwards D.

BMC Genet. 2013 Dec 5;14:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-115.

13.

Genome-wide association study reveals genetic architecture of eating behavior in pigs and its implications for humans obesity by comparative mapping.

Do DN, Strathe AB, Ostersen T, Jensen J, Mark T, Kadarmideen HN.

PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071509. eCollection 2013.

14.

Genetic parameters for male fertility and its relationship to skatole and androstenone in Danish Landrace boars.

Strathe AB, Velander IH, Mark T, Ostersen T, Hansen C, Kadarmideen HN.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Oct;91(10):4659-68. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6454. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

PMID:
23942714
15.

Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates.

Henryon M, Berg P, Ostersen T, Nielsen B, Sørensen AC.

J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(13):4681-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5158. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

16.

Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Su G, Christensen OF, Ostersen T, Henryon M, Lund MS.

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045293. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

17.

Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.

Christensen OF, Madsen P, Nielsen B, Ostersen T, Su G.

Animal. 2012 Oct;6(10):1565-71. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000742. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

PMID:
22717310
18.

Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs.

Ostersen T, Christensen OF, Henryon M, Nielsen B, Su G, Madsen P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Nov 9;43:38. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-38.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center